Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 5802 No. 1: 1 May 2026
Type: Article
Published: 2026-05-01
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5802.1.10
Page range: 174-186
Abstract views: 105
PDF downloaded: 7

Identity and redescription of Congromuraena musteliceps Alcock, 1894 (Anguilliformes: Congridae)

ICAR-National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources; Lucknow; Uttar Pradesh – 226 002; India
Institute of Marine Biology; National Taiwan Ocean University; Keelung 202; Taiwan; R.O.C.
ICAR-National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources; Lucknow; Uttar Pradesh – 226 002; India
Pisces Taxonomy molecular analyses Gnathophis Bathycongrus Congermuraena

Abstract

The taxonomic identity of Congromuraena musteliceps Alcock, 1894 has remained unresolved for more than a century, with the species having been placed in four different genera. For much of this time it was accommodated under Gnathophis Kaup, 1859, although Smith et al. (2017) noted similarities with Japonoconger Asano, 1958 and suggested that its generic placement required further study. During recent deep-sea trawl surveys along the west coast of India, a large number of specimens referable to G. musteliceps were collected. Detailed morphological examination, combined with molecular analyses of mitochondrial CO1 sequences, demonstrated that G. musteliceps is more closely related to Japonoconger than to Gnathophis or other genera of Congridae. Herein, we redescribe the species based on type material and newly collected specimens and comparisons are made with the closest genera of the subfamily Congrinae and confirming its generic affinity with Japonoconger.

 

References

  1. Alcock, A.W. (1889) Natural history notes from H.M. Indian marine survey steamer `Investigator,’ Commander Alfred Carpenter, R.N., D.SO, commanding.—No. 13. On the bathybial fishes of the Bay of Bengal and neighbouring waters, obtained during the seasons 1885–1889. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 6, 4, 450–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222938909460563
  2. Alcock, A.W. (1894) Natural history notes from H.M. Indian Marine Survey Steamer `Investigator,’ Commander C.F. Oldham, R.N., commanding. Series II, No. 11. An account of a recent collection of bathybial fishes from the Bay of Bengal and from the Laccadive Sea. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 63 (Pt. 2), 115–137, pls. 6–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222939308677478
  3. Asano, H. (1958) Studies on the congrid eels of Japan. III. Description of a new genus Japonoconger typed by Ariosoma sivicola Matsubara and Ochiai, with consideration to the related genera. Dobutsugaku Zasshi [Zoological Magazine Tokyo], 67, 316–321.
  4. Böhlke, J. (1949) The systematic position of the apodal fish genus Bathymyrus. Copeia, 3, 218. https://doi.org/10.2307/1438989
  5. Böhlke, E.B. (1982) Vertebral formulae for type specimens of eels (Pisces: Anguilliformes). Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 134, 31–49.
  6. Castle, P.H.J. (1995) Alcock’s congrid eels from the “Investigator” collections in Indian seas 1888–1894. Copeia, 3, 706–718. https://doi.org/10.2307/1446768
  7. Fricke, R., Eschmeyer, W.N. & Fong, J.D. (2025) Eschmeyer’s Catalog of Fishes: Genera/Species by Family/Subfamily. Electronic version. Available from: http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/SpeciesByFamily.asp (accessed 10 January 2025)
  8. Gilbert, C.H. (1891) Descriptions of apodal fishes from the tropical Pacific. In: Scientific results of explorations by the U.S. Fish Commission steamer Albatross. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 14 (856), pp. 347–352. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.14-856.347
  9. Günther, A. (1870) Catalogue of the fishes in the British Museum. Catalogue of the Physostomi, containing the families Gymnotidae, Synbranchidae, Muraenidae, Pegasidae, and of the Lophobranchii, Plectognathi, Dipnoi, Ganoidei, Chondropterygii, Cyclostomata, Leptocardii, in the British Museum. Catalogue of Fishes, 8, 1–549.
  10. Günther, A. (1877) Preliminary notes on new fishes collected in Japan during the expedition of H.M.S. Challenger. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 4, 20 (119), Art. 56, 433–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222937708682260
  11. Günther, A. (1887) Report on the deep-sea fishes collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger, 22 (Pt. 57), 1–268 pp., 66 pls. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.15693
  12. Hoang, D.T., Chernomor, O., Von Haeseler, A., Minh, B.Q. & Vinh, L.S. (2018) UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Molecular biology and evolution, 35 (2), 518–522. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx281
  13. Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B.Q., Wong, T.K., Von Haeseler, A. & Jermiin, L.S. (2017) ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature methods, 14 (6), 587–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4285
  14. Karmovskaya, E.S. (2006) Promyllantor atlanticus (Anguilliformes, Congridae), a new species from the continental slope of southwestern Africa. Journal of Ichthyology, 46 (8), 566–569. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032945206080030
  15. Kaup, J.J. (1856) Uebersicht der Aale. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, 22 (1), 41–77. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.11240
  16. Kaup, J.J. (1859) Neue aalaehnliche Fische des Hamburger Museums, beschrieben und abgebildet. Abhandlungen aus dem Gebiete der Naturwissenschaften herausgegeben von dem Naturwissenschaftlichen Verein in Hamburg, 4 (2), 1–29 + 1–4 (Supplement), pls. 1–5.
  17. Letunic, I. & Bork, P. (2021) Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic acids research, 49 (W1), W293–W296. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab301
  18. Matsubara, K. & Ochiai, A. (1951) On the conger eels related to Arisoma nystromi (Jordan et Snyder) found in the waters of Japan and China. Memoirs of the College of Agriculture Kyoto University, 59, 1–18.
  19. Minh, B.Q., Schmidt, H.A., Chernomor, O., Schrempf, D., Woodhams, M.D., Von Haeseler, A. & Lanfear, R. (2020) IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Molecular biology and evolution, 37 (5), 1530–1534. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa015
  20. Norman, J.R. (1925) A new eel of the genus Congromuraena from Tobago, with notes on C. balearica and C. opisthophthalmus. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 9, 15 (86), 313–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222932508633210
  21. Ogilby, J.D. (1898) New genera and species of fishes. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 23 (Part 3), 280–299.
  22. Poll, M. (1953) Poissons III. Téléostéens Malacoptérygiens. Résultats Scientifiques. Expédition Océanographique Belge dans les Eaux Côtières Africaines de l’Atlantique Sud (1948–1949). 4 (2). Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Bruxelles, 258 pp., 8 pls.
  23. Ramsay, E.P. & Ogilby, J.D. (1888) Descriptions of two new fishes from Port Jackson. Proceedings of the Linnaean Society of New South Wales, Series 2, 2, 1021–1023. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.29227
  24. Smith, D.G. (1989) Family Congridae. In: Böhlke, E.B. (Ed.), Fishes of the Western North Atlantic. Memoirs of the Sears Foundation for Marine Research, 1 (9), pp. 460–567. https://doi.org/10.12987/9781933789323-017
  25. Smith, D.G., Jawad, L. & Al-Kharusi, L.H. (2017) New records and new information on four eel species from Oman. Journal of Ocean Science Foundation, 28, 34–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.996846
  26. Sumod, K.S. (2018) Deep-sea eels (Teleostei: Anguilliformes) of the Indian EEZ: Systematics, distribution and biology. PhD Thesis, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kerala, 477 pp.
  27. Swainson, W. (1838) On the natural history and classification of fishes, amphibians, & reptiles, or monocardian animals. Vol. 1. A. Spottiswoode, London, 368 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.62140

How to Cite

Kodeeswaran, P., Huang, J.-F. & Kumar, T.T.A. (2026) Identity and redescription of Congromuraena musteliceps Alcock, 1894 (Anguilliformes: Congridae). Zootaxa, 5802 (1), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5802.1.10