Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Article
Published: 2026-01-28
Page range: 399-416
Abstract views: 46
PDF downloaded: 2

Morphological assessment of the Common Barn Owl Tyto alba (Strigiformes: Tytonidae) supports three species

55732 Ninepipe Rd; Charlo; MT 59824; USA
Global Owl Project; Buckeystown; MD; USA
Centro de Investigaciones en Ecología y Zonas Áridas Sabana Larga; Santa Ana de Coro; Estado Falcón; Venezuela
Centro de Investigaciones en Ecología y Zonas Áridas Sabana Larga; Santa Ana de Coro; Estado Falcón; Venezuela
Instituto de Salud Agricola Integral; Calabozo estado Guárico; Venezuela
Universidade Estadual de Maringá; Maringá; Paraná; Brazil
Department of Biology; Walla Walla University; Walla Walla; WA; USA
Global Owl Project; Alexandria; VA; USA
Aves Taxonomy Conservation Morphometrics

Abstract

Barn owls (Tytonidae: Tyto) have long been considered a single species, despite their worldwide distribution and despite being highly geographically variable in morphology. Multiple genomic studies have now demonstrated that the Common Barn Owl Tyto alba sensu lato complex has at least three deeply genetically diverged evolutionary units: Tyto alba sensu stricto, occurring from southern Scandinavia to South Africa; Tyto furcata, of southern Canada to Patagonia; and Tyto javanica, of the Himalayan plateau to Tasmania and the tropical Pacific. Their extensive geographic variation, however, greatly complicates delineation of their taxonomy. With the aim of shedding further light on barn owl taxonomy, we conducted a comprehensive morphological analysis of the three major Tyto alba s.l. clades, measuring up to 21 different morphometrics on 192 live and 1271 museum barn owl specimens. Our results clearly demonstrated mensural differences between the three evolutionary species units of barn owls, primarily in that the several subspecies of Tyto furcata as a clade are, sex-for-sex, considerably larger than the other two clades, especially in wing length. Despite Tyto javanica being sister to the other two clades and being somewhat intermediate in size, its several subspecies are more similar in overall size to subspecies of Tyto alba s.s. (the smallest-bodied clade) than either is to Tyto furcata. Our research supports and supplements the genetic and vocal evidence that recently led to the now widely adopted subdivision of the Barn Owl Tyto alba s.l. into three separate species.

 

References

  1. Alaie-Kakhki, N. & Aliabadian, M. (2012) Mitochondrial DNA (CYTB) divergences in two distinct, Old World and New World barn owls. Iranian Journal of Animal Biosystematics, 8, 47–55.
  2. Aliabadian, M., Alaie-Kakhki, N., Mirshamsi, O., Nijman, V. & Roulin, A. (2016) Phylogeny, biogeography, and diversification of barn owls (Aves: Strigiformes). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 119, 904–918. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12824
  3. AviList Core Team (2025) AviList: The Global Avian Checklist. Version 2025. Available from: https://www.avilist.org/checklist/v2025/ (accessed 22 December 2025) https://doi.org/10.2173/avilist.v2025
  4. Bevier, L., Cicero, C., Dunn, J.L., Jiménez, R.A. & Johnson, O. (2024) Treat Tyto furcata as a separate species from Barn Owl T. alba. North & Middle American Classification Committee. Available from: https://americanornithology.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/2024-C-1-26-final.pdf (accessed 22 February 2024)
  5. BirdLife International (2025) Species factsheet: Common Barn-owl Tyto alba. Available from: https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/common-barn-owl-tyto-alba (accessed 12 October 2025)
  6. Borda-de-Água, L., Grilo, C. & Pereira, H. (2014) Modeling the impact of road mortality on Barn Owl (Tyto alba) populations using age-structured models. Ecological Modelling, 276, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.12.022
  7. Boves, T. & Belthoff, J. (2012) Roadway mortality of Barn Owls in Idaho, USA. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 76, 1381–1392. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.378
  8. Canadian Raptor Conservancy (2025) Barn Owls. Canadian Raptor Conservancy. Available from: https://canadianraptorconservancy.com/barn-owls/ (accessed 28 September 2025)
  9. Colihueque, N., Gantz, A., Ricardo, R.J. & Parraguez, M. (2015) Genetic divergence analysis on the Common Barn Owl Tyto alba (Scopoli, 1769) and the Short-eared Owl Asio flammeus (Pontoppidan, 1763) from southern Chile using COI sequence. Zookeys, 534, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.534.5953
  10. Debus, S., Kirwan, G., Bruce, M., Christie, D. & Marks, J. (2024) Eastern Barn Owl (Tyto javanica). In: Billerman, S., Keeney, B. & Smith, M. (Eds.), Birds of the World. Version 1.0. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. Available from: https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/eabowl1/1.0/introduction (accessed 28 September 2025) https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.eabowl1.01
  11. del Hoyo, J. & Collar, N.J. (2014) HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Vol. 1. Non-passerines. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, 904 pp.
  12. Gill, F., Donsker, D. & Rasmussen, P. (Eds.) (2021) IOC World Bird List. Version 11.1. Available from: https://doi.org/10.14344/IOC.ML.11.1 (accessed 28 September 2025)
  13. Hindmarch, S., Elliott, J., Mccann, S. & Levesque, P. (2017) Habitat use by Barn Owls across a rural to urban gradient and an assessment of stressors including, habitat loss, rodenticide exposure and road mortality. Landscape and Urban Planning, 164, 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.04.003
  14. Huang, A., Elliott, J., Cheng, K., Ritland, K., Ritland, C., Thomsen, S., Hindmarch, S. & Martin, K. (2016) Barn Owls (Tyto alba) in western North America: phylogeographic structure, connectivity, and genetic diversity. Conservation Genetics, 17, 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-015-0787-0
  15. Indiana Department of Natural Resources (2025) Barn Owl, Indiana State Government. Available from: https://www.in.gov/dnr/fish-and-wildlife/wildlife-resources/animals/barn-owl/ (accessed 28 September 2025)
  16. Iowa Department of Natural Resources (2025) Iowa’s threatened and endangered species, 571 IAC chapter 77.2: List of Animals, Department of Natural Resources. Available from: https://www.iowadnr.gov/Conservation/Iowas-Wildlife/Threatened-and-Endangered (accessed 28 September 2025)
  17. IUCN (2025) Common Barn Owl. In: The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version February 2025. IUCN Red List. IUCN, Gland. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T22688504A155542941.en (accessed 8 October 2025)
  18. Jiménez, R. & Cicero, C. (2018) Split Barn Owl (Tyto alba) into three species. North & Middle America Classification Committee. Available from: https://americanornithology.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/2018-C-amended.pdf (accessed 9 September 2021)
  19. Jiménez, R. & Cicero, C. (2021) Split Barn Owl (Tyto alba) into three species. South American Classification Committee. Available from: https://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCprop908.htm (accessed 9 September 2021)
  20. Johnson, M. & St. George, D. (2020) Estimating the number of rodents removed by Barn Owls nesting in boxes on winegrape vineyards. Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference, 29, 1–8.
  21. Kelso, L. & Kelso, E. (1936) The relation of feathering of feet of American owls to humidity of environment and to life zones. The Auk, 53, 51–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/4077355
  22. Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources (2025) Barn Owls in Kentucky, Commonwealth of Kentucky. Available from: https://fw.ky.gov/Wildlife/Pages/Barn-Owls-in-Kentucky.aspx (accessed 28 September 2025)
  23. König, C. & Weick, F. (2008) Owls of the World. 2nd Edition. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, 528 pp.
  24. Kruger, A. & Badenhorst, S. (2018) Remains of a Barn Owl (Tyto alba) from the Dinaledi Chamber, Rising Star Cave, South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 114, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2018/5152
  25. Kuczyński, L., Tryjanowski, P., Antczak, M., Skoracki, M. & Hromada, M. (2003) Repeatability of measurements and shrinkage after skinning: the case of the Great Grey Shrike Lanius excubitor. Bonn Zoological Bulletin, 51, 127–130.
  26. Madan, M., Prothero, D. & Syverson, V. (2016) Stasis in Barn Owls from the La Brea tar pits during the last glacial-interglacial cycle. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, 74, 153–157.
  27. Marti, C., Poole, A., Bevier, L., Bruce, M., Christie, D., Kirwan, G., Marks, J. & Pyle, P. (2024) American Barn Owl (Tyto furcata). In: Billerman, S., Keeney, B. & Smith, M. (Eds.), Birds of the World. Version 1.1. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. Available from: https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/brnowl/1.1/introduction (accessed 28 September 2025) https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.brnowl.01.1
  28. McClure, C., Lepage, D., Dunn, L., Anderson, D., Schulwitz, S., Camacho, L., Robinson, B., Christidis, L., Schulenberg, T., Iliff, M., Rasmussen, P. & Johnson, J. (2020) Towards reconciliation of the four world bird lists: hotspots of disagreement in taxonomy of raptors. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 287, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.0683
  29. Michigan Department of Natural Resources (2025) Threatened and endangered species list, State of Michigan. Available from: https://www.michigan.gov/dnr/managing-resources/wildlife/wildlife-permits/threatened-endangered-species/threatened-and-endangered-species-list (accessed 28 September 2025)
  30. Mlíkovský, J. (1998) A new Barn Owl (Aves: Strigidae) from the early Miocene of Germany, with comments on the fossil history of the Tytoninae. Journal of Ornithology, 139, 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01653335
  31. Mooi, E., Sarstedt, M. & Mooi-Reci, I. (2018) Principal component and factor analysis. In: Market Research. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Singapore, pp. 265–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5218-7_8
  32. Morrison III, W., Lohr, J., Duchen, P., Wilches, R., Trujillo, D., Mair, M. & Renner, S. (2009) The impact of taxonomic change on conservation: does it kill, can it save, or is it just irrelevant? Biological Conservation, 142, 3201–3206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.07.019
  33. Nature Serve (2025) Tyto alba, Barn Owl. Nature Serve Explorer. Available from: https://explorer.natureserve.org/Taxon/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.1341768/Tyto_furcata (accessed 28 September 2025)
  34. New York Department of Environmental Conservation (2025) List of endangered, threatened and special concern fish & wildlife species of New York State. Available from: https://www.dec.ny.gov/animals/7494.html (accessed 28 September 2025)
  35. Nijman, V. & Aliabadian, M. (2013) DNA barcoding as a tool for elucidating species delineation in wide-ranging species as illustrated by owls (Tytonidae and Strigidae). Zoological Science, 30, 1005–1009. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.30.1005
  36. Ohio Department of Natural Resources (2025) Barn Owl, State of Ohio. Available from: https://ohiodnr.gov/discover-and-learn/animals/birds/barn-owl (accessed 28 September 2025)
  37. R Core Team (2023) R Statistical Software. Version 4.3.0. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/ (accessed 28 June 2023)
  38. Ramsden, D. (2003) Barn Owls and major roads: results and recommendations from a 15-year research project, The Barn Owl Trust. Available from: https://www.barnowltrust.org.uk/product/barn-owls-and-major-roads-results-and-recommendations-from-a-15-year-research-project/ (accessed 29 June 2023)
  39. Romano, A., Séchaud, R., Hirzel, A. & Roulin, A. (2019) Climate-driven convergent evolution of plumage colour in a cosmopolitan bird. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 28, 496–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12870
  40. Romano, A., Séchaud, R. & Roulin, A. (2020) Geographical variation in bill size provides evidence for Allen’s rule in a cosmopolitan raptor. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 29, 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13007
  41. Romano, A., Séchaud, R. & Roulin, A. (2021) Evolution of wing length and melanin-based coloration in insular populations of a cosmopolitan raptor. Journal of Biogeography, 48, 961–973. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.14053
  42. Roulin, A. (2020) Barn Owls: Evolution and Ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, 297 pp. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316694114
  43. Ruane, S. (2015) Using geometric morphometrics for integrative taxonomy: an examination of head shapes of milksnakes (genus Lampropeltis). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 174, 394–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12245
  44. Salim, H., Noor, H., Hamid, N., Omar, D., Kasim, A. & Abidin, C. (2014) Secondary poisoning of captive Barn Owls, Tyto alba javanica through feeding with rats poisoned with chlorophacinone and bromadiolone. Journal of Oil Palm Research, 26, 62–72.
  45. Schwentner, M., Timms, B. & Richter, S. (2011) An integrative approach to species delineation incorporating different species concepts: a case study of Limnadopsis (Branchiopoda: Spinicaudata). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 104, 575–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01746.x
  46. Suárez, W. & Olson, S. (2015) Systematics and distribution of the giant fossil barn owls of the West Indies (Aves: Strigiformes: Tytonidae). Zootaxa, 4020 (3), 533–553. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4020.3.7
  47. Suárez, W. & Olson, S. (2020) Systematics and distribution of the living and fossil small barn owls of the West Indies (Aves: Strigiformes: Tytonidae). Zootaxa, 4830 (3), 544–564. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4830.3.4
  48. Töpfer, T. (2018) Morphological variation in birds: plasticity, adaptation, and speciation. In: Tietze, D. (Ed.), Bird Species: How they Arise, Modify, and Vanish. Springer, Cham, pp. 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91689-7_4
  49. Uva, V., Päckert, M., Cibois, A., Fumagalli, L. & Roulin, A. (2018) Comprehensive molecular phylogeny of barn owls and relatives (Family: Tytonidae), and their six major Pleistocene radiations. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 125, 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2018.03.013
  50. Wagner, H., Weger, M., Klaas, M. & Schröder, W. (2017) Features of owl wings that promote silent flight. The Royal Society: Interface Focus, 7, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2016.0078
  51. Wiens, J. (2004) The role of morphological data in phylogeny reconstruction. Systematic Biology, 53, 653–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150490472959
  52. Williams, M. (2017) From field to museum tray: shrinking of the Mallard Anas platyrhynchos. Wildfowl, 67, 123–129.
  53. Wilson, R. & McCracken, K. (2008) Specimen shrinkage in Cinnamon Teal. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 120, 390–392. https://doi.org/10.1676/07-040.1

How to Cite

Daugherty, R.L., Iii, A.J.B., Salas, V.G., Contreras, F.J., Chávez, R., Mendes, G.C., Nestler, J.R. & Johnson, D.H. (2026) Morphological assessment of the Common Barn Owl Tyto alba (Strigiformes: Tytonidae) supports three species. Zootaxa, 5752 (3), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5752.3.5