Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 5737 No. 4: 29 Dec. 2025
Type: Article
Published: 2025-12-29
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5737.4.2
Page range: 494-508
Abstract views: 66
PDF downloaded: 6

Description of two new species of Cenophengus (Coleoptera: Phengodidae: Cenophenginae), with an assessment of their phylogenetic position in the genus

Colección Entomológica IEXA "Dr. Miguel Ángel Morón Ríos"; Instituto de Ecología A.C. (INECOL); Carretera Antigua a Coatepec 351; El Haya; 91073 Xalapa; Veracruz; México
Laboratório de Entomologia; Departamento de Zoologia; Instituto de Biologia; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; A1–107; Bloco A; Av. Carlos Chagas Filho; 373; Cidade Universitária; Ilha do Fundão; Rio de Janeiro; Brasil
Coleoptera Railroad-worm beetles morphology taxonomy Central America

Abstract

Cenophengus is one of the most species-rich genera within the family Phengodidae, with 30 species distributed from south USA to Costa Rica. This study describes two new species of Cenophengus, C. fagerstromi sp. nov. from Honduras and C. zaragozai sp. nov. from Mexico. Detailed morphological descriptions, including diagnostic characters, are provided for each of the new species, in addition to an updated key for species of the genus. In addition, the phylogeny of Cenophengus is reanalyzed by incorporating the newly described species into the existing data set. This updated phylogenetic analysis offers a more complete understanding of the evolutionary relationships within the genus.

 

References

  1. Alfaro, M.E., Zoller, S. & Lutzoni, F. (2003) Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 20 (2), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msg028
  2. Barbosa, F.F., Roza, A.S., Mermudes, J.R.M., Geiser, M.F., Hodecek, J., Dey, L.S., Ivie, M.A., Vega-Badillo, V., Ferreira, V.S. & Kundrata, R. (2025) Phylogenomic analyses of rare Neotropical lineages reveal the independent loss of antennal rami in railroad-worm beetles (Coleoptera: Phengodidae). Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny, 83, 531 –542. https://doi.org/10.3897/asp.83.e164315
  3. Bremer, B., Jansen, R.K., Oxelman, B., Backlund, M., Lantz, H. & Kim, K.J. (1999) More characters or more taxa for a robust phylogeny—case study from the coffee family (Rubiaceae). Systematic Biology, 48 (3), 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/106351599260085
  4. Brown, J.W., Parins-Fukuchi, C., Stull, G.W., Vargas, O.M. & Smith, S.A. (2017) Bayesian and likelihood phylogenetic reconstructions of morphological traits are not discordant when taking uncertainty into consideration: a comment on Puttick et al. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284, 20170986. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0986
  5. Costa, C. & Zaragoza-Caballero, S. (2010) Phengodidae Le Conte. In: Leschen, R.A.B., Beutel, R.G., Lawrence, J.F. (Eds.), Handbook of Zoology, Coleoptera, beetles morphology and systematics (Elateroidea, Bostrichiformia, Cucujiformia partim). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & KG, Berlín and Nueva York, pp. 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110911213.126
  6. Erixon, P., Svennblad, B., Britton, T. & Oxelman, B. (2003) Reliability of Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap frequencies in phylogenetics. Systematic Biology, 52 (5), 665–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150390235485
  7. Evenhuis, N.L. (2024) The insect and spider collections of the World website. WWW document. Available from: http://hbs.bishopmuseum.org/codens/codens-inst.html (accessed 30 November 2024)
  8. Ferreira, V.S., Roza, A.S., Barbosa, F.F., Vega-Badillo, V., Zaragoza-Caballero, S., Mermudes, J.R.M., Ivie, M.A., Hansen, A.K., Brunke, A.J., Douglas, H.B., Solodovnikov, A. & Kundrata, R. (2024) Phylogenomics of Phengodidae (Coleoptera: Elateroidea): towards a natural classification of a bioluminescent and paedomorphic beetle lineage, with recognition of a new subfamily. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 201, zlae093. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlae093
  9. Goloboff, P.A. (1993) Estimating character weights during tree search. Cladistics, 9, 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1993.tb00209.x
  10. Goloboff, P.A., Farris, J.S., Källersjö, M., Oxelman, B., Ramírez, M.J. & Szumik, C.A. (2003) Improvements to resampling measures of group support. Cladistics, 19 (4), 324–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2003.tb00376.x
  11. Goloboff, P.A., Carpenter, J.M., Arias, J.S. & Esquivel, D.R.M. (2008b) Weighting against homoplasy improves phylogenetic analysis of morphological data sets. Cladistics, 24, 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00209.x
  12. Goloboff, P.A., Farris, J.S. & Nixon, K.C. (2008a) TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics, 24, 774–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00217.x
  13. Hillis, D.M. & Bull, J.J. (1993) An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology, 42 (2), 182–192.
  14. Hoang, D.T., Chernomor, O., von Haeseler, A., Minh, B.Q. & Vinh, L.S. (2018) UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35, 518–522. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx281
  15. Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Ronquist, F. (2001) MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics, 17, 754–755. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754
  16. Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B.Q., Wong, T.K., von Haeseler, A. & Jermiin, L.S. (2017) ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods, 14, 587–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4285
  17. Lawrence, J.F., Zhou, Y.L., Lemann, C., Sinclair, B.J. & Ślipiński, A. (2021) The hind wing of Coleoptera (Insecta): Morphology, nomenclature and phylogenetic significance. Part 1. General discussion and Archostemata–Elateroidea. Annales Zoologici, 71, 421–606. https://doi.org/10.3161/00034541ANZ2021.71.3.001
  18. Lewis, P.O. (2001) A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Systematic Biology, 50 (6), 913–925. https://doi.org/10.1080/106351501753462876
  19. Minh, B.Q., Schmidt, H.A., Chernomor, O., Schrempf, D., Woodhams, M.D., von Haeseler, A. & Lanfear, R. (2020) IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 37 (5), 1530–1534. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa015
  20. Nixon, K.C. (2002) Winclada ver. 1.00.08. Published by the author, Ithaca, New York.
  21. Nixon, K.C. & Carpenter, J.M. (1993) On outgroups. Cladistics, 9, 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1006/clad.1993.1028
  22. Rambaut, A., Suchard, M.A., Xie, D. & Drummond, A.J. (2014) Tracer version 1.6. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh. Available from: http://beast.community/tracer (accessed 30 June 2016)
  23. Roza, A.S. & Mermudes, J.R.M. (2019) New Genus and Two New Species of Railroad-Worm Beetles from Brazil, with a Discussion on Asymmetry of Aedeagus in the Family (Coleoptera: Phengodidae). Annales Zoologici, 69 (4), 805–816. https://doi.org/10.3161/00034541ANZ2019.69.4.012
  24. Roza, A.S. & Mermudes, J.R.M. (2020) A new genus of railroad-worm beetles from the Atlantic Rainforest from Brazil (Coleoptera: Phengodidae, Mastinocerinae). Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, 60, e202060. https://doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2020.60.special-issue.10
  25. Roza, A.S., Mermudes, J.R.M. & Silveira, L.F.L.D. (2018) New species and rediagnosis of Akamboja, and a new record for A. minimum (Coleoptera: Phengodidae, Mastinocerinae). Journal of Natural History, 52 (45–46), 2935–2947. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2018.1559958
  26. Roza, A.S., Quintino, H.Y.S., Mermudes, J.R.M. & Silveira, L.F.L. (2017) Akamboja gen. nov., a new genus of railroad-worm beetle endemic to the Atlantic Rainforest, with five new species (Coleoptera: Phengodidae, Mastinocerinae). Zootaxa, 4306 (4), 501–523. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4306.4.3
  27. Roza, A.S. (2023) A new genus and a new species of railroad-worm beetle from Peru (Coleoptera, Phengodidae, Mastinocerinae). European Journal of Taxonomy, 864, 64–76. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2023.864.2087
  28. Schwarz, G. (1978) Estimating the Dimension of a Model. The Annals of Statistics, 6 (2), 461–464. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2958889] https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136
  29. Soltis, P.S. & Soltis, D.E. (2003) Applying the bootstrap in phylogeny reconstruction. Statistical Science, 18 (2), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1063994980
  30. Vega-Badillo, V., Morrone, J.J. & Zaragoza-Caballero, S. (2021a) Revision of the genus Cenophengus LeConte, 1881 (Coleoptera, Phengodidae), with the description of four new species, new geographic records and a new synonymy. ZooKeys, 1068, 73–118. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1068.70295
  31. Vega-Badillo, V., Ramírez-Ponce, A. & Zaragoza-Caballero, S. (2023) Halffterus, a new genus (Coleoptera: Phengodidae, Mastinocerinae) from Peru. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 58 (2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650521.2023.2240443
  32. Vega-Badillo, V. & Zaragoza-Caballero, S. (2019) Especie nueva del género Phengodes (Phengodella) (Coleoptera: Phengodidae) y una clave para los fengódidos de Belice. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 90 (2019), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2019.90.2863
  33. Vega-Badillo, V., Zaragoza-Caballero, S. & Ivie, M.A. (2020) A new genus of Phengodidae (Coleoptera) from the neotropical region. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, 60 (Special), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2020.60.special-issue.06
  34. Vega-Badillo, V., Zaragoza-Caballero, S. & Rios-Ibarra, J.J. (2021b) New species of the genus Cenophengus LeConte 1881 (Coleoptera: Phengodidae) from Mexico and Guatemala. Zootaxa, 5023 (2), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5023.2.3
  35. Vega-Badillo, V., Zaragoza-Caballero, S., Ochoterena-Booth, H. & Morrone, J.J. (2021c) Phylogenetic analysis and evolutionary morphology of wings in the genus Cenophengus LeConte, 1881 (Coleoptera: Phengodidae: Mastinocerinae) based on morphological characters. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 293, 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2021.06.007
  36. Wiesemüller, B. & Rothe, H. (2006) Interpretation of bootstrap values in phylogenetic analysis. Anthropologischer Anzeiger, 64 (2), 161–165. https://doi.org/10.1127/anthranz/64/2006/161
  37. Yang, Z. & Rannala, B. (1997) Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: a Markov Chain Monte Carlo method. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 14, 717–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025811
  38. Zander, R.H. (2004) Minimal values for reliability of bootstrap and jackknife proportions, decay index, and Bayesian posterior probability. Phyloinformatics, 2, 1–13.
  39. Zaragoza-Caballero, S. & Pérez-Hernández, C.X. (2014) Sinopsis de la familia Phengodidae (Coleoptera): Trenecitos, bigotudos, glow-worms, railroad-worms o besouros trem de ferro. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Distrito federal-Mexico, 128 pp. [http://www.ibiologia.unam.mx/barra/publicaciones/Phengodidae_web_final.pdf] https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.9786070251832e.2014

How to Cite

Vega-Badillo, V. & Roza, A.S. (2025) Description of two new species of Cenophengus (Coleoptera: Phengodidae: Cenophenginae), with an assessment of their phylogenetic position in the genus. Zootaxa, 5737 (4), 494–508. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5737.4.2