Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 5646 No. 4: 11 Jun. 2025
Type: Article
Published: 2025-06-11
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5646.4.3
Page range: 527-544
Abstract views: 96
PDF downloaded: 1

Description of a new species, Xiphodolamia maliki sp. nov. and the shark teeth of Middle Eocene (Lutetian) aged Soğucak Formation in Küçükçekmece, Istanbul, Turkey

Sevinç-Erdal İnönü Foundation; MAREM (Marmara Environmental Monitoring) Project; Department of Marine Sciences; Anadoluhisarı Toplarönü No: 8; 34810; Istanbul; Turkey.
Istanbul Technical University; Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences; Ayazağa 34469; Istanbul; Turkey.
Pisces küçükçekmece Shark teeth Middle Eocene Lutetian tethys morphology

Abstract

In 1954–1955, the prominent geologist, Ord. Prof. Malik Sayar (1862–1965) from the Geological Sciences Institute at Istanbul Technical University (ITU), collected fossil shark teeth from the Eocene deposits of Küçükçekmece, Turkey, specifically the Soğucak Formation. The İhsan Ketin Museum at ITU preserved these teeth for decades. Among the collection, 31 teeth belong to Macrorhizodus cf. praecursor, 2 to Otodus sokolovi, 44 to the genus Xiphodolamia, and 43 remain unidentified, for a total of 120 teeth. Xiphodolamia spp. are rare in the fossil record and are represented solely by isolated teeth. This study aims to reclassify the museum specimens that were previously identified at the genus level as Lamna sp. to compare the teeth of the Xiphodolamia genus with other classified members of this genus and to highlight the differences that warrant renaming these specimens as Xiphodolamia maliki sp. nov. For this purpose, the morphology and internal tooth structure of these teeth, collected by Malik Sayar from the Küçükçekmece Eocene deposits, were compared with those of teeth sourced from different origins.

In addition, this paper documents other teeth collected by Malik Sayar from the Lutetian-aged Soğucak Formation of the Eocene Epoch and provides information on the geological context, the palaeoecology of the formation, and the autecology of the species.

 

References

  1. Adnet, S., Hosseinzadeh, R., Antunes, M.T., Balbino, A.C., Kozlov, V.A. & Cappetta, H. (2009) Review of the enigmatic Eocene shark genus Xiphodolamia (Chondrichthyes, Lamniformes) and description of a new species recovered from Angola, Iran and Jordan. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 55 (3–4), 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2009.04.005
  2. Adnet, S., Cappetta, H. & Tabuce, R. (2010) A Middle-Late Eocene vertebrate fauna (marine fish and mammals) from southwestern Morocco; preliminary report: age and palaeobiogeographical implications. Geological Magazine, 147 (6), 860–870. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756810000348
  3. Arıç (Sayar), C. (1955) Haliç-Küçükçekmece Gölü Bölgesinin Jeolojisi. İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Maden Fakültesi, İstanbul, 48 pp. [in Turkish]
  4. Asan, A., Salame, I. & Strougo, A. (2022) Sharks and rays from the Mokattamian Stage (middle and late Eocene) of Egypt, including some species from the middle Eocene Midra Shale of Qatar. Egyptian Journal of Geology, 66 (1), 105–153. https://doi.org/10.21608/egjg.2022.173845.1028
  5. Averianov, A.O. (2005) A new sea turtle (Testudines, Cheloniidae) from the Middle Eocene of Uzbekistan. Paleontological Journal, 39 (6), 646–651.
  6. Bor, T. (1985) Elasmobranch teeth (Vertebrata, Pisces) from the Dongen Formation (Eocene). The Netherlands. Meded. Werkgr. Tert. Kwart. Geol., 22 (2), 73–122.
  7. Cappetta, H. (1987) Handbook of Paleoichthyology. Volume 3b: Chondrichthyes II. Mesozoic and Cenozoic Elasmobranchii. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 193 pp.
  8. Casier, E. (1958) Contribution a 1'etude des Poissons fossiles des Antilles. Schweizerische Paläontologische Abhandlungen, 74, 1–95. [in French]
  9. Cicimurri, D.J. & Ebersole, J.A. (2021) New Paleogene elasmobranch (Chondrichthyes) records from the Gulf Coastal Plain of the United States, including a new species of Carcharhinus de Blainville, 1816. Cainozoic Research, 21 (2), 147–164.
  10. Dacı (Dizer), A. (1951) Küçükçekemece ile Çatalca arasındaki Nummulitiğin Paleontolojik etüdü I, II. (Etude Paleontologique du Nummulitique entre Küçükçekmece et Çatalca I, II). İÜFF Mecmua, İstanbul, S: B.C: XVI, 2–3. [in Turkish]
  11. Diedrich, C.G. (2013) Evolution of white and megatooth sharks, and evidence for early predation on seals, sirenians, and whales. Natural Science, 5 (11), 1203. https://doi.org/10.4236/ns.2013.511148
  12. Ebersole, J.A., Cicimurri, D.J. & Stringer, G.L. (2019) Taxonomy and biostratigraphy of the elasmobranchs and bony fishes (Chondrichthyes and Osteichthyes) of the lower-to-middle Eocene (Ypresian to Bartonian) Claiborne Group in Alabama, USA, including an analysis of otoliths. European Journal of Taxonomy, 585. [published online] https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2019.585
  13. Erentöz, C. (1953) Etudes Géologiques dans la Region de Çatalca (İstanbul). Publications de l’Insttitut d’Etudes et de Recherches Miniéres en Turque, Ankara, 94 pp, pls. 6, 7 maps. [PhD thesis]
  14. Gingerich, P.D. (2006) Environment and evolution through the Paleocene–Eocene thermal maximum. Trends in ecology & evolution, 21(5), 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.03.006
  15. González-Barba, G. (2003) Descripción de asociaciones faunísticas de elasmobranquios fósiles del eoceno superior (Priaboniano) de las formaciones Tepetate y Bateque de Baja California Sur, México. La Paz, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, XIII + 226 pp. [in Spanish]
  16. Gorur, N., Akkök, R., Seymen, İ., Alkaya, F. & Oktay, F.Y. (1981) Trakya Doğusunda Eosen Resifleri. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi, 3–4 (2), 303–306. [in Turkish]
  17. Holec, P., Hornacek, M. & Sykora, M. (2005) Shark tooth species Xiphodolamia eocaena (Woodward, 1889) from Durkovec stonequarry near Spišské Tomášovce (Slovakia). Mineralia Slovaca, 37 (1), 83–86.
  18. Holmes, A.W. (1961) A Stratigarphic review of Thrace. TPAO Arama Grubu Arşivi Rapor No. 368. 56 pp. Ankara. [unpublished]
  19. Kasar, S. (1987) Edirne-Kırklareli-Saray (Kuzey Trakya) Bölgesinin Jeolojisi. Türkiye 7. Petrol Kongresi Tebliğler Kitabı, 1987, 281–291. [in Turkish]
  20. Kasar, S., Bürkan, K., Siyako, M. & Demir, O. (1983) Tekirdağ-Şarköy-Keşan-Enez Bölgesinin Jeolojisi ve Hidrokarbon Olanakları. TPAO Arama Grubu Arşivi Rapor No. 1771. s.n., Ankara, 71 pp. [unpublished, in Turkish]
  21. Kovalchuk, O., Kriwet, J., Shimada, K., Ryabokon, T., Barkaszi, Z., Dubikovska, A., Anfimova, G. & Davydenko, S. (2023) Middle Eocene cartilaginous fishes (Vertebrata: Chondrichthyes) of the Dnieper-Donets Basin, northern Ukraine. Palaeontologia electronica, 26 (2), a32. [online] https://doi.org/10.26879/1283
  22. Leidy, J. (1877) Description of Vertebrate Remains Chiefly from the Phosphate Beds of South Carolina. Journal Academia Natural Sciences Philadelphia, 8, pl. XXXIV, figs. 25–30.
  23. Maisch IV, H., Becker, M. & Chamberlain Jr, J. (2015) Chondrichthyans from a lag deposit between the Shark River Formation (Middle Eocene) and Kirkwood Formation (Early Miocene), Monmouth County, New Jersey. Paludicola, 10, 149–183.
  24. Mollen, F.H. (2008) A new Middle Eocene species of Premontreia (Elasmobranchii, Scyliorhinidae) from Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium. Geologica Belgica, 11, 123–131.
  25. Moreau, F., Dion, M. & Mathis, S. (2013) Présence des genres Xiphodolomia et Isistus (Chondrichthyes, Elasmobranchii) à L' Éocène du Bassin de Paris. Cossmanniana, 15, 85–98. [Antwerpen, ISSN 1157-4402, in French]
  26. Otero, R., Bostelmann, E., Ugalde, R. & Oyarzún, L.J. (2015) First record of cartilaginous fishes (Chondrichthyes) from the early Miocene of Chilean Patagonia. AT 5 Bioestratigrafía y Paleontología Andina, XIV Congresso Geológico Chileno, Volumen III, 712–715.
  27. Perez, V., Leder, R. & Badaut, T. (2021) Body length estimation of Neogene macrophagous lamniform sharks (Carcharodon and Otodus) derived from associated fossil dentitions. Palaeontol Electron, 24 (1), a09. https://doi.org/10.26879/1140
  28. Popov, E.V., Lopyrev, V.A., Panteleev, A.V., Biriukov, A.V. & Timirchev, F.K. (2024) Chondrichthyan fishes from the Middle Eocene Osinovaya Formation of Rostov Region, Russia. Historical Biology, 37 (1), 126–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2023.2291774
  29. R Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed 5 May 2025)
  30. Rayner, D., Mitchell, T. & Rayner, M. (2009) London Clay Fossils of Kent and Essex. Medway Fossil and Mineral Society, Rochester, Kent, 228 pp. [ISBN: 978-0-9538243-1-1]
  31. Rückert-Ülkümen, N., Özkar-Öngen, İ. & Çevik-Üner, B. (2009) Doğu Paratetis’in Ergene Havzası’ndaki (KB Türkiye) Paleobiyocoğrafik Özellikleri. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi, 22 (2), 119–140.
  32. Spamer, E.E. & Daeschler, E. (1995) Previously unfigured type specimens of fossil fish, reptiles, and mammals in the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 429–458.
  33. Thomas, H., Roger, J., Halawani, M., Memesh, A., Lebret, P., Bourdillon, C., Buffetaut, E., Cappetta, H., Cavelier, C., Dutheil, D., Tonge, H. & Vaslet, D. (1999) Late Paleocene to Early Eocene marine vertebrates from the uppermost Aruma Formation (northern Saudi Arabia): implications for the K-Transition. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences-Series IIA-Earth and Planetary Science, 329 (12), 905–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1251-8050(00)88504-3
  34. Trechmann, C.T. (1925) The Scotland Beds of Barbados. Geological Magazine, 62 (11), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001675680010617X
  35. Trif, N., Ciobanu, R. & Codrea, V. (2016) The first record of the giant shark Otodus megalodon (Agassiz, 1835) from Romania. Brukenthal Acta Musei, 11 (3), 507–526.
  36. Trif, N., Codrea, V. & Arghiuș, V. (2019) A fish fauna from the lowermost Bartonian of the Transylvanian Basin, Romania. Palaeontologia Electronica, 22.3.56, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.26879/909
  37. Uhen, M.D. (2007) Evolution of marine mammals: Back to the sea after 300 million years. The Anatomical Record, Hoboken, 290, 514–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.20545
  38. Ünal, O.T. (1967) Trakya Jeolojisi ve Petrol İmkânları. TPAOArama Grubu Arşivi Rapor No. 391, Ankara, 80 pp. [unpublished, in Turkish]
  39. Ward, D.J. & Wiest, R.L. (1990) A checklist of Palaeocene and Eocene sharks and rays (Chondrichthyes) from the Pamunkey Group, Maryland and Virginia, USA. Tertiary Research, 12 (2), 81–88.
  40. Woodward, A.S. (1899) Notes on the teeth of sharks and skates from English Eocene formations. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 16 (1), pl. 1, fig. 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7878(99)80036-4
  41. Woodward, A.S. (1900) On some fish-remains from the Parana Formation, Argentine Republic. Annals & Magazine of Natural History London, 6, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930008678334
  42. Zalmout, I.S., Antar, M.S., Shafy, E.A.E., Metwally, M.H. & Hatab, E.B.E. & Gingerich, P.D. (2012) Priabonian sharks and rays (late Eocene: Neoselachii) from Minqar Tabaghbagh in the western Qattara Depression, Egypt. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 32 (6), 71–90.
  43. Zvonok, E.A. & Danilov, I.G. (2017) A revision of fossil turtles from the Kiev clays (Ukraine, middle Eocene) with comments on the history of the collection of fossil vertebrates of AS Rogovich. Proceedings of the Zoological Institute RAS, 321 (4), 485–516. https://doi.org/10.31610/trudyzin/2017.321.4.485

How to Cite

Artüz, M.L. & Sakinç, M. (2025) Description of a new species, Xiphodolamia maliki sp. nov. and the shark teeth of Middle Eocene (Lutetian) aged Soğucak Formation in Küçükçekmece, Istanbul, Turkey. Zootaxa, 5646 (4), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5646.4.3