Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 5374 No. 4: 20 Nov. 2023
Type: Article
Published: 2023-11-20
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5374.4.7
Page range: 563-574
Abstract views: 284
PDF downloaded: 17

Is Eriocnemis luciani meridae (Aves: Trochilidae) a diagnosable taxon and does it come from Venezuela, with remarks on the collectors Salomón Briceño and Walther Frederick Henninger

Bird Group; Natural History Museum; Akeman Street; Tring; Herts. HP23 6AP; UK
Setor de Ornitologia; Dpto. de Vertebrados; Museu Nacional da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; Quinta da Boa Vista S/N; São Cristóvão; Rio de Janeiro; RJ 20940-040; Brazil
Field Museum of Natural History; 1400 South Lakeshore Drive; Chicago; IL 60605; USA
Aves andes holotype hummingbirds subspecies taxonomy

Abstract

Eriocnemis luciani meridae was originally described from a single specimen collected in the late 19th century in western Venezuela. Subsequently a second specimen of E. luciani, also labelled “Venezuela”, has been taken as additional proof for a highly disjunct population of this hummingbird, which otherwise ranges from southwest Colombia to southern Peru (taxonomy-dependent). Eriocnemis l. meridae has been accepted by all of the global checklists of birds, but has been routinely ignored by Venezuelan sources. In an effort to resolve this dichotomy of treatment, we re-examined the specimens’ plumage in comparison with relevant material in two major European bird collections. We found that the characters used to erect E. l. meridae are only doubtfully or weakly expressed in the holotype and appear invisible in the Ohio specimen, but both are clearly referrable to the species E. luciani. Evidence that the second specimen was definitely collected in Venezuela is weak and its overall provenance is unclear. In contrast, an extensive historical investigation of the relevant collectors indicates that the holotype does appear to have been taken in Venezuela, although perhaps not in the precise locality indicated for it. This leaves an unusual situation whereby we consider the case for a separate Venezuelan endemic taxon to be unproven, but there is no incontrovertible reason to exclude the species from the country’s avifauna; according to recent niche modelling data it is best searched for in the Sierra Nevada of Mérida state. In contrast, a second subspecies of E. luciani, E. l. baptistae, described by the same authors as endemic to part of western Ecuador is, according to our reappraisal, clearly diagnosable and is upheld.

 

References

  1. Ascanio, D. (2023) Species lists of birds for South American countries and territories: Venezuela. Version 30 January 2023. Available from: http://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCCountryLists.htm (accessed 23 June 2022)
  2. Ascanio, D., Rodríguez, G. & Restall, R. (2017) Birds of Venezuela. Christopher Helm, London, 592 pp.
  3. Belton, W.H. (1984) Birds of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Part l. Rheidae through Furnariidae. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 178, 369‒636.
  4. Bourcier, J. (1847) [Trochilus luciani]. Annales des sciences physiques et naturelles, d’agriculture et d’industrie, 10, 624.
  5. Chubb, C. (1919) Notes on collections of birds in the British Museum, from Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, and Argentina. Ibis, (11)1, 1‒55, 256‒290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1919.tb02871.x
  6. Clements, J.F., Schulenberg, T.S., Iliff, M.J., Billerman, S.M., Fredericks, T.A., Gerbracht, J.A., Lepage, D., Sullivan, B.L. & Wood, C.L. (2022) The eBird/Clements checklist of birds of the world: v2022. Available from: https://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/download/ (accessed 23 June 2022)
  7. Condit, R., Engelbrecht, B.M.J., Pino, D., Pérez, R. & Turner, B.L. (2013) Species distributions in response to individual soil nutrients and seasonal drought across a community of tropical trees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 110, 5064–5068. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218042110
  8. Dickinson, E.C. (Ed.), (2003) The Howard and Moore complete checklist of the birds of the world. 3rd Edition. Christopher Helm, London, 1039 pp.
  9. Dickinson, E.C. & Remsen, J.V. (Eds.), (2013) The Howard and Moore complete checklist of the birds of the world. Vol. 1. 4th Edition. Aves Press, Eastbourne, 461 pp.
  10. eBird (2023) eBird: an online database of bird distribution and abundance. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY. Available from: https://ebird.org/home (accessed 1 July 2023)
  11. Eifrig, C.W.G. (1929a) Walther Frederick Henninger. Journal of Mammalogy, 10, 260‒261. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/10.3.260
  12. Eifrig, C.W.G. (1929b) In Memoriam: Walther Frederick Henninger 1873-1929. Wilson Bulletin, 41, 258‒259.
  13. van den Elzen, R. (2010) Type specimens in the bird collections of the Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Bonn. Bonn Zoological Bulletin, 59, 29–77.
  14. Fjeldså, J. & Krabbe, N. (1990) Birds of the high Andes. Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen and Apollo Books, Svendborg, 876 pp.
  15. Freile, J. & Restall, R. (2018) Birds of Ecuador. Christopher Helm, London, 656 pp.
  16. GBIF Secretariat (2022) GBIF occurrence download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.yw2qd4
  17. Gill, F., Donsker, D. & Rasmussen, P. (2022) IOC World Bird List (v12.1). Available from: http://www.worldbirdnames.org/ (accessed 14 October 2022) https://doi.org/10.14344/IOC.ML.12.1
  18. Graham, C.H., Parra, J.L., Tinoco, B.A., Stiles, F.G. & McGuire, J.A. (2012) Untangling the influence of ecological and evolutionary factors on trait variation across hummingbird assemblages. Ecology, 93, S99–S111. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3304926.v1
  19. Gregory-Wodzicki, K.M. (2000) Uplift history of the central and northern Andes: A review. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 112, 1091–1105. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(2000)112<1091:UHOTCA>2.0.CO;2
  20. Hazzi, N.A., Moreno, J.S., Ortiz-Movliav, C. & Palacio, R.D. (2018) Biogeographic regions and events of isolation and diversification of the endemic biota of the tropical Andes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 115, 7985‒7990. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803908115
  21. Henninger, W.F. (1907) The Paridae of Germany. Wilson Bulletin, 19, 3‒13.
  22. Henninger, W.F. (1923) Natal plumage of Belonopterus cayannensis. Auk, 40, 122.
  23. Herzog, S.K., Terrill, R.S., Jahn, A.E., Remsen, J.V., Maillard Z., O., García-Solíz, V.H., MacLeod, R., Maccormick, A. & Vidoz, J.Q. (2016) Birds of Bolivia. Field Guide. Asociación Armonía, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, 491 pp.
  24. Heynen, I. (1999a) Sapphire-vented Puffleg Eriocnemis luciani. In: del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. & Sargatal, J. (Eds.), Handbook of the birds of the world. Vol. 5. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, p. 640.
  25. Heynen, I. (1999b) Coppery-naped Puffleg Eriocnemis sapphiropygia. In: del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. & Sargatal, J. (Eds.), Handbook of the birds of the world. Vol. 5. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, p. 640.
  26. Hilty, S.L. (2003) Birds of Venezuela. Christopher Helm, London, 878 pp.
  27. Horváth, J. (1970) The destroyed bird types of the Hungarian Natural History Museum. Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici, 62, 363‒372.
  28. del Hoyo J. & Collar, N.J. (2014) HBW and BirdLife International illustrated checklist of the birds of the world. Vol. 1. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, 903 pp.
  29. Meyer de Schauensee, R. & Phelps, W.H. (1978) A Guide to the Birds of Venezuela. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 424 pp.
  30. Miranda, J., León, J.G. & Angelozzi, G. (2021) Lista oficial de las aves de Venezuela. Versión Agosto 2021. Available from: http://uvo.ciens.ucv.ve/?page_id=2134 (accessed 23 June 2022)
  31. Olson, D.M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E.D., Burgess, N.D., Powell, G.V.N., Underwood, E.C., D’amico, J.A., Itoua, I., Strand, H.E., Morrison, J.C., Loucks, C.J., Allnutt, T.F., Ricketts, T.H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux, J.F., Wettengel, W.W., Hedao, P. & Kassem, K.R. (2001) Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: A new map of life on Earth. BioScience, 51, 933–938. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2
  32. Oniki, Y. & Willis, E.O. (2002) Bibliography of Brazilian birds 1500 – 2002. Instituto de Estudos da Natureza, Rio Claro, 531 pp.
  33. Paynter, R.A. (1982) Ornithological gazetteer of Venezuela. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, MA, 244 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.14633
  34. Paynter, R.A. (1993) Ornithological gazetteer of Ecuador. 2nd edition. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, MA, 247 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.14626
  35. Paynter, R.A. & Traylor, M.A. (1991) Ornithological gazetteer of Brazil. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, MA, 352 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.14635
  36. Peters, J.L. (1945) Check-list of birds of the world. Vol. 5. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, MA, 306 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.14581
  37. Phelps, W.H. (1944) Resumen de las colecciones ornitológicas hechas en Venezuela. Boletín de la Sociedad Venezolana de Ciencias Naturales, 9(61), 325–444.
  38. Phelps, W.H. & Phelps Jr., W.H. (1958) Lista de las aves de Venezuela con su distribución, Tomo 2, Parte 1, No-Passeriformes. Boletín de la Sociedad Venezolana de Ciencias Naturales, 19, 1‒317.
  39. Ramoni-Perazzi, P., Bianchi Pérez, G., Araujo Quintero, R.A., Barrera Avellaneda, M. & Molina, M. (2001) Las aves del enclave semiárido de Lagunillas, Cordillera de Mérida, Venezuela. Acta Biologica Venezuelica, 21, 1–10.
  40. Ramoni-Perazzi, P., Schuchmann, K.-L., Ablan Bortone, M. & Soto-Werschitz, A. (2017) On the absence of the Green-tailed Trainbearer Lesbia nuna (Trochilidae) from Venezuela: An analysis based on environmental niche modelling. Biodiversity Data Journal, 5, e22092. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e22092
  41. Ramoni-Perazzi, P., Schuchmann, K.-L., Weller, A., Soto-Werschitz, I.A. & Passamani, M. (2020) Niches and radiations: a case study on the Andean sapphire-vented puffleg Eriocnemis luciani and coppery-naped puffleg E. sapphiropygia (Aves, Trochilidae). Journal of Avian Biology, 51 (1), e02242. https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.02242
  42. Restall, R., Rodner, C. & Lentino, M. (2006) Birds of northern South America: an identification guide. Species accounts. Christopher Helm, London, 880 pp.
  43. Rheinwald, G. & van den Elzen, R. (1984) Die Wirbeltiersammlungen des Museums Alexander Koenig und ihre Typusexemplare. II. Vögel. Bonner Zoologische Monographien, 19, 49–150.
  44. Ridgely, R.S. & Greenfield, P. J. (2001) The birds of Ecuador. Vol. 1. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York. 848 pp.
  45. Röhl, E. (1932) Apuntes para la historia y la bibliografía de la ornitología venezolana. Boletín de la Sociedad Venezolana de Ciencias Naturales, 1(6), 201–248.
  46. Salvin, O. (1897) [On new humming-birds from Peru]. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club, 6, 30‒31.
  47. Sancho, G. (2004) Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Onoseris (Asteraceae, Mutisieae) inferred from morphology. Systematic Botany, 29, 432‒447. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25063974
  48. Schuchmann, K.L. (1999) Family Trochilidae (hummingbirds). In: del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. & Sargatal, J. (Eds.), Handbook of the birds of the world. Vol. 5. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, pp. 468–680.
  49. Schuchmann, K.L. & Kirwan, G.M. (2020). Ruby-topaz Hummingbird (Chrysolampis mosquitus), version 1.0. In del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., Sargatal, J., Christie, D.A. & de Juana, E. (Eds.), Birds of the World. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.ruthum1.01
  50. Schuchmann, K.‐L., Weller, A.A. & Heynen, I. (2001) Systematics and biogeography of the Andean genus Eriocnemis (Aves: Trochilidae). Journal für Ornithologie, 142, 433–482. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0361.2001.01025.x
  51. Schulenberg, T.S. & Sedgwick, C.W. (2020) Sapphire-vented Puffleg (Eriocnemis luciani), version 1.0. In: Schulenberg, T.S. (Ed.), Birds of the World. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.savpuf1.01
  52. Sibley, C.G. & Monroe, B.L. (1990) Distribution and taxonomy of birds of the world. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1111 pp.
  53. Simpson, B.B. & Todzia, C.A. 1990. Patterns and processes in the development of the high Andean flora. American Journal of Botany, 77, 1419–1432. https://doi.org/10.2307/2444752
  54. Stiles, F.G. (1984) Inventario preliminar de las aves de las selvas nubladas de Monte Zerpa y la Mucuy, Mérida, Venezuela. Boletín de la Sociedad Venezolana de Ciencias Naturales, 39 (142), 11–23.
  55. Taczanowski, L. (1874) Description des oiseaux nouveaux du Pérou central. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1874, 129‒140.
  56. Viloria, Á.L. & Pyrcz, T.W. (2001) Revalidación y revisión de Steromapedaliodes Forster, con descripción de dos especies nuevas (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae, Satyrinae). Anartia, 15, 1–22.
  57. Viloria, Á.L., Ferrer-Paris, J.S., Camacho, J. & Costa, M. (2015) New satyrine butterflies from the Venezuelan Andes (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Anartia, 25, 95–160. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18332
  58. Vuilleumier, F. & Ewert, D.N. (1978) The distribution of birds in Venezuelan páramos. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 162 (2), 47–90.
  59. Weigend, M. (2002) Observations on the biogeography of the Amotape-Huancabamba Zone in northern Peru. Botanical Review, 68, 38–54. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/4354410]
  60. Zimmer, J.T. (1951) Studies of Peruvian birds. No. 61, The genera Aglaeactis, Lafresnaya, Pterophanes, Boissonneaua, Heliangelus, Eriocnemis, Haplophaedia, Ocreatus, and Lesbia. American Museum Novitates, 1540.