Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Correspondence
Published: 2023-05-01
Page range: 193-194
Abstract views: 364
PDF downloaded: 37

A call for the review of public biodiversity databases

Arthur Temple College of Forestry and Agriculture; Stephen F. Austin State University; Nacogdoches; Texas; USA
Department of Biology; Texas A&M University- Kingsville; Kingsville; Texas; USA
General Zoological Nomenclature public biodiversity databases

References

  1. Araújo, M.B., Anderson, R.P., Barbosa, A.M., Beale, C.M., Dormann, C.F., Early, R., Garcia, R.A., Guisan, A., Maiorano, L., Naimi, B., O’Hara, R.B., Zimmermann, N.E. & Rahbek, C. (2019) Standards for distribution models in biodiversity assessments. Science Advances, 5, eaat4858. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat4858 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat4858
  2. Durso, A.M., Bolon, I., Kleinhesselink, A.R., Mondardini, M.R., Fernandez-Marquez, J.L., Gutsche-Jones, F., Gwilliams, C., Tanner, M., Smith, C.E., Wüster, W., Grey, F. & Ruiz de Castañeda, R. (2021) Crowdsourcing snake identification with online communities of professional herpetologists and avocational snake enthusiasts. Royal Society Open Science, 8, 201273. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201273
  3. Eversole, C.B, Powell, R.L., Lizarro, D.E., Moreno, F., Vaca, G.C., Aparicio, J. & Crocker, A.V. (2019) Introduction of a novel natural history collection: a model for global scientific collaboration and enhancement of biodiversity infrastructure with a focus on developing countries. Biodiversity and Conservation, 28, 1921–1931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01765-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01765-0
  4. Hedrick, B.P., Heberling, J.M., Meineke, E.K., Turner, K.G., Grassa, C.J., Park, D.S., Kennedy, J., Clarke, J.A., Cook, J.A., Blackburn, D.C., Edwards, S.V. & Davis, C.C. (2020) Digitization and the future of natural history collections. BioScience, 70, 243–251. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz163
  5. Marshall, C.R., Finnegan, S., Clites, E.C., Holroyd, P.A., Bonuso, N., Cortez, C., Davis, E., Dietl, G.P., Druckenmiller, P.S., Eng, R.C., Garcia, C., Estes-Smargiassi, K., Hendy, A., Hollis, K.A., Little, H., Nesbitt, E.A., Roopnarine, P., Skibinski, L., Vendetti, J. & White, L.D. (2018) Quantifying the dark data in museum fossil collections as palaeontology undergoes a second digital revolution. Biology Letters, 14, 20180431. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0431 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0431
  6. Minelli, A. (2017) Grey nomenclature needs rules. Ecologia Montenegrina, 7, 654–656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37828/em.2016.7.31
  7. Minelli, A. (2019) The galaxy of non-Linnean nomenclature. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 41, 31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-019-0271-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-019-0271-0
  8. Moudrý, V. & Devillers, R. (2020) Quality and usability challenges of global marine biodiversity databases: An example for marine mammal data. Ecological Informatics, 56, 101051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2020.101051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2020.101051
  9. Zizka, A.​, Carvalho, F.A., Calvente, A., Baez-Lizarazo, M.R., Cabral, A., Coelho, J.F.R., Colli-Silva, M., Fantinati, M.R., Fernandes, M.F., Ferreira-Araújo, T., Moreira, F.G.L., Santos, N.M.T., Santos, T.A.B., Clicia dos Santos-Costa, R., Serrano, F.C., Alves da Silva, A.P., de Souza Soares, A., Cavalcante de Souza, P.G., Tomaz, E.C., Vale, V.F., Luiz Vieira, T. & Antonelli, A. (2020) No one-size-fits-all solution to clean GBIF. PeerJ, 8, e9916. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9916 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9916