Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 5244 No. 2: 17 Feb. 2023
Type: Article
Published: 2023-02-17
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5244.2.2
Page range: 123-144
Abstract views: 540
PDF downloaded: 43

Taxonomic status of the enigmatic Natrix sexcarinata Wagler, 1824 (Serpentes: Colubridae: Colubrinae)

Departamento de Vertebrados, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, Rio de Janeiro, 20940-040, Brasil.
Departamento de Vertebrados, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, Rio de Janeiro, 20940-040, Brasil.
Amazon geographic variation hemipenial morphology linear morphometry nomenclature polychromatism Phrynonax Pseustes Spilotes

Abstract

Wagler described Natrix sexcarinata through a specimen collected on the banks of the Amazon River in Brazil, without citing a specific location. The species was later transferred to different Neotropical genera (Chironius, Herpetodryas, Phrynonax, and Pseustes) currently allocated in the Family Colubridae. The taxonomic instability of Natrix sexcarinata is probably due to its brief original description in combination with its supposedly inaccurate illustration. Despite the holotype being lost during World War II, some authors have pointed out that its description is somewhat similar to the widespread concept of Pseustes poecilonotus. More recently, a molecular study proposed the synonymy of the genera Pseustes with Spilotes, resurrecting the Phrynonax genus to allocate Ph. poecilonotus and Ph. polylepis. However, the taxonomic positioning of Natrix sexcarinata remains unsatisfactory with respect to the cis-Andean taxa placed in Phrynonax or even Spilotes throughout the Amazon. Considering the taxonomic and nomenclatural problems mentioned above, we investigated how many Phrynonax species occur along the Amazon Basin and what would be their applicable name. We examined the external morphology (meristic, morphometric, and color pattern data) of 118 Phrynonax specimens and prepared the hemipenes of seven specimens to understand geographic, sexual, and ontogenetic variability parameters. Our result suggests the synonymy of Ph. polylepis and N. sexcarinata under the combination Phrynonax sexcarinatus. Based on available evidence, we reinforce that Phrynonax sexcarinatus is the only congener that occurs along the Amazon Basin. We have also designated a Natrix sexcarinata neotype to stabilize its complex nomenclature.

References

  1. Albuquerque, N.R. & Fernandes, D.S. (2022) Taxonomic revision of the parrot snake Leptophis ahaetulla (Serpentes, Colubridae). Zootaxa, 5153 (1), 1–69. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5153.1.1

  2. Albuquerque, N.R., Santos, F.M., Borges-Nojosa, D.M. & Ávila, R.W. (2022) A new species of parrot-snake of the genus Lpetophis Bell, 1825 (Serpentes, Colubridae) from the semi-arid region of Brazil. South American Journal of Herpetology, 23, 7–24. http://doi.org/10.2994/SAJH-D-19-00113.1

  3. Amaral, A. (1929) Estudo sobre ophidios neotropicos XX - Revisão do gênero Phrynonax Cope, 1862. Memórias do Instituto Butantan, 4, 301–320.

  4. Bailey, J.R. (1955) The snakes of the genus Chironius in southeastern South America. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology of the University of Michigan, 571, 1–21.

  5. Barbour, T. & Amaral, A. (1924) Notes on some Central American snakes. Occasional Papers of the Boston Society of Natural History, 1924 (5), 129–132.

  6. Bocourt, M.F. (1888) Mission scientifique au Mexique et dans l’Amérique Central. In: Duméril, A.H.A., Bocourt, M.F. & Mocquard, E., Études sur les reptiles. Troisième Partie. Première section de Recherches Zoologiques. Livraison 11. Imprimerie impeìriale, Paris, pp. 1–696. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.119116

  7. Boie, F. (1827) Bemerkungen über Merrem’s Versuch eines Systems der Amphibien. Marburg, 1820. 1te Lieferung, Ophidier. Isis von Oken, Jena, 20 (6), 508–566.

  8. Boubli, J.P., Ribas, C., Alfaro, J.W.L., Alfaro, M.E., da Silva, M.N.F., Pinho, G.M. & Farias, I.P. (2015) Spatial and temporal patterns of diversification on the Amazon: A test of the riverine hypothesis for all diurnal primates of Rio Negro and Rio Branco in Brazil. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 82, 400–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.09.005

  9. Boulenger, G.A. (1891) On reptiles, batrachians, and fishes from the Lesser West Indies. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1891, 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1891.tb01759.x

  10. Boulenger, G.A. (1894) Catalogue of the snakes in the British Museum (Natural History). Vol. II. Trustees of the Natural History Museum, London, 382 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.8316

  11. Boulenger, G.A. (1896) Catalogue of the snakes in the British Museum (Natural History). Vol. III. Trustees of the Natural History Museum, London, 727 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.8316

  12. Brongersma, L.D. (1937) Herpetological notes XIV-XVI. XV. The type of Dipsas dieperinkii Schlegel, 1837, and the genus Pseustes Fitzinger, 1843. Zoologische Mededelingen, 20, 5–6.

  13. Burbrink, F.T., Gehara, M., McKelvy, A.D. & Myers, E.A. (2020) Resolving spatial complexities of hybridization in the context of the gray zone of speciation in North American ratsnakes (Pantherophis obsoletus complex). Evolution, 75 (2), 260–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14141

  14. Cope, E.D. (1860) Descriptions of new species of the reptilian genera Hyperolius, Liuperus and Tropidodipsas. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 12, 517–518.

  15. Cope, E.D. (1862) Catalogue of the reptiles obtained during the explorations of the Parana, Paraguay, Bermejo and Uruguay Rivers by Capt. Thos. J. Page, U.S.N., and of those procured by Lieut. N. Michler, U.S. Top. Eng., commander of the expedition conducting the survey of the Atrato River. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 14, 346–359.

  16. Cope, E.D. (1875) On the Batrachia and Reptilia of Costa Rica, with notes on the herpetology and ichthyology of Nicaragua and Peru. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 2 (8), 93–154. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.47043

  17. Cope, E.D. (1893) Second addition to the knowledge of the Batrachia and Reptilia of Costa Rica. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 31, 333–347.

  18. Costa, H.C., Moura, M.R. & Feio, R.N. (2013) Taxonomic revision of Drymoluber Amaral, 1930 (Serpentes: Colubridae). Zootaxa, 3716 (3), 349–394. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3716.3.3

  19. Dal Vechio, F., Prates, I., Grazziotin, F.G., Graboski, R. & Rodrigues, M.T. (2021) Molecular and phenotypic data reveal a new Amazonian species of pit vipers (Serpentes: Viperidae: Bothrops). Journal of Natural History, 54 (37–38), 2415–2437. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2020.1845835

  20. Dixon, J.R., Wiest Jr., J.A. & Cei, J.M. (1993) Revision of the Neotropical snake genus Chironius (Serpentes: Colubridae). Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali, Torino, Monografie 13, 1–279.

  21. Dowling, H.G. & Savage, J.M. (1960) A guide to the snake hemipenis: a survey of basic structure and systematic characteristics. Zoologica, 45, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.203350

  22. Duméril, A.M.C., Bibron, G. & Duméril, A. (1854) Erpétologie Genérale ou Histoire naturelle Complete des Reptiles. Vol. 7. Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret, Paris, 780 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.45973

  23. Fernandes, D.S. & Hamdan, B. (2014) A new species of Chironius Fitzinger, 1826 from the state of Bahia, northeastern Brazil (Serpentes: Colubridae). Zootaxa, 3881 (6), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3881.6.5

  24. Fitzinger, L. (1843) Systema Reptilium. Braumüller et Seidel Bibliopolas, Wien, 106 pp.

  25. Franzen, M. & Glaw, F. (2007) Type catalogue of reptiles in the Zoologische Staatssammlung Munchen. Spixiana, 30 (2), 201–274.

  26. Giraudo, A.R. & Scrocchi, G.J. (2002) Argentinian snakes: an annoted checklist. Smithsonian Herpetological Information Service, 132, 1–53. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.23317515.132.1

  27. Godinho, M.B.D.C. & Silva, F.R. (2018) The influence of riverine barriers, climate, and topography on the biogeographic regionalization of Amazonian anurans. Scientific Reports, 8 (1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21879-9

  28. Günther, A.C.L.G. (1858) Catalogue of Colubrine Snakes in the British Museum. Taylor and Francis, London, 281 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.13272

  29. Günther, A.C.L.G. (1872) Seventh account of new species of snakes in the collection of the British Museum. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 4, 9 (49), 13–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/002229372011951771

  30. Günther, A.C.L.G. (1894) Biologia Centrali-Americana, Reptilia and Batrachia. R. H. Porter, London, 326 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.730

  31. Hallermann, J. (1998) Annotated catalogue of the type specimens of the herpetological collection in the Zoological Museum of the University of Hamburg. Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut, Hamburg, 95, 197–223. https://doi.org/10.1655/07-023.1

  32. Hamdan, B. & Fernandes, B. (2015) Taxonomic revision of Chironius flavolineatus (Jan, 1863) with description of a new species (Serpentes: Colubridae). Zootaxa, 4012 (1), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4012.1.5

  33. Harvey, M.B. & Embert, D. (2008) Review of Bolivian Dipsas (Serpentes: Colubridae), with comments on other South American species. Herpetological Monographs, 22 (1), 54–105. https://doi.org/10.1655/07-023.1

  34. Henderson, R.W., Passos, P. & Feitosa, D. (2009) Geographic variation in the emerald treeboa, Corallus caninus (Squamata: Boidae). Copeia, 2009 (3), 572–582. https://doi.org/10.1643/CH-08-190

  35. Hoge, A.R. [“1960” (1962)] Posição sistematica de Natrix sexcarinatus Wagler 1824. Memórias do Instituto Butantan, 30, 27–30.

  36. Hoogmoed, M.S. & Gruber, U. (1983) Spix and Wagler type specimens of reptiles and amphibians in the Natural History Museum in Munich (Germany) and Leiden (The Netherlands). Spixiana, 9, 319–415.

  37. ICZN (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 4th Edition. Published by The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, 306 pp.

  38. Jadin, R.C., Burbrink, F.T., Rivas, G.A., Vitt, L.J., Barrio-Amorós, C.L. & Guralnick, R.P. (2013) Finding arboreal snakes in an evolutionary tree: phylogenetic placement and systematic revision of the neotropical birdsnakes. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 52 (3), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12055

  39. Kok, P.J.R. (2010) A new species of Chironius Fitzinger, 1826 (Squamata: Colubridae) from the Pantepui region, northeastern South America. Zootaxa, 2611, 31–44.

  40. Lei, J., Sun, X., Jiang, K., Vogel, G., Booth, D.T. & Ding, L. (2014) Multilocus phylogeny of Lycodon and the taxonomic revision of Oligodon multizonatum. Asian Herpetological Journal, 5 (1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1245.2014.00026

  41. Linnaeus, C. (1758) Systema Naturae per Regna tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis. Editio Decima. Tomus I. Laurentii Salvii, Holmiae, Uppsala, 828 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542

  42. Myers, C.W., Rodrigues, M.T. & Vanzolini, P.E. (2011) Status of early 19th-century names authored in parallel by Wied and Schinz for South American reptiles and amphibians, with designations of three nomina protecta. American Museum Novitates, 3714, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1206/3714.2

  43. Natera-Mumaw, M., González, L.F.E. & Fernández, M.C. (2015) Atlas Serpientes de Venezuela. Una Visión Actual de Su Diversidad. Dimacofi Negocios Avanzados S.A., Santiago, 441 pp.

  44. Montingelli, G.G. & Zaher, H. (2011) New species of Mastigodryas Amaral, 1934 from Brazilian Amazonia and Guyana. Journal of Herpetology, 45 (1), 111–119.

  45. Montingelli, G.G., Grazziotin, F.G., Battilana, J., Murphy, R.W., Zhang, Y.-P. & Zaher, H. (2019) Higher-level phylogenetic affinities of the Neotropical genus Mastigodryas Amaral, 1934 (Serpentes: Colubridae), species-group definition and description of a new genus for Mastigodryas bifossatus. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 57 (2), 205–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12262

  46. Nagy, Z.T., Lawson, R., Joger, U. & wink, M. (2004) Molecular systematic of racers, whipsnakes and relatives (Reptilia: Colubridae) using mitochondrial and nuclear markers. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 42, 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0469.2004.00249.x

  47. Nogueira, C.C., Argôlo, A.J.S., Arzaendia, V., Azevedo, J.A., Barbo, F.E., Bérnils, Bolochio, B.E., Borges-Martins, M., Brasil-Godinho, M., Braz, H., Buononato, M.A., Cisneros-Heredia, D.F., Colli, G.R., Costa, H.C., Franco, F.L., Giraudo, A., Gonzalez, R.C., Guedes, T., Hoogmoed, M.S., Marques, O.A.V., Montingelli, G.G., Passos, P., Prudente, A.L.C., Rivas, G.A., Sanchez, P.M., Serrano, F.C., Silva Jr., N.J., Strüsssmann, C., Vieira-Alencar, J.P., Zaher, H., Sawaya, R.J. & Martins, M. (2019) Atlas of Brazilian snakes: verified point-locality maps to mitigate the Wallacean shortfall in a megadiverse snake fauna. South American Journal of Herpetology, 14 (Special Issue 1), 1–274. https:// doi.org/10.2994/SAJH-D-19-00120.1

  48. Oliveira, U., Vasconcelos, M.F., Santos, A.J. (2017) Biogeography of Amazon birds: rivers limit species composition, but not areas of endemism. Scientific Reports, 7 (1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03098-w

  49. Olson, D.M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E.D., Burgess, N.D., Powell, G.V.N., Underwood, E.C., D’Amico, J.A., Itoua, I., Strand, H.E., Morrison, J.C., Loucks, C.J., Allnutt, T.F., Ricketts, T.H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux, J.F., Wettengel, W.W., Hedao, P. & Kassem, K.R. (2001) Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth. BioScience, 51 (11), 933–938. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2

  50. Passos, P., Martins, A. & Pinto-Coelho, D. (2016) Population morphological variation and natural history of Atractus potschi (Serpentes: Dipsadidae) in Northeastern Brazil. South American Journal of Herpetology, 11 (3), 188–211. https://doi.org/10.2994/SAJH-D-16-00034.1

  51. Peracca, M.G. (1896) Rettili ed anfibii raccolti nel Darien ed a Panama dal dottor E. Festa. Bollettino dei Musei di Zoologia ed Anatomia comparata, 11 (253), 1–12.

  52. Pesantes, O.S. (1994) A method for preparing the hemipenis of preserved snakes. Journal of Herpetology, 28 (1), 93–95. https://doi.org/10.2307/1564686

  53. Peters, J.R. & Orejas-Miranda, B. (1970) Catalogue of the Neotropical Squamata: Part I. Snakes. Bulletin of the United Sates National Museum, 297, 1–347.

  54. Peters, W.C.H. (1867) Über Flederthiere (Pteropus gouldii, Rhinolophus deckenii, Vespertilio lobipes, Vesperugo temminckii) und Amphibien (Hypsilurus godeffroyi, Lygosoma scutatum, Stenostoma narisostre, Onychocephalus unguirostris, Ahaetulla polylepis, Pseudechis scutellatus, Hoplobatrachus reinhardtii, Hyla coriacea). Monatsberichte der königlich Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1867, 703–712.

  55. Peters, W. (1869) Üeber neue Gattungen und neue oder weniger bekannte Arten von Amphibien (Eremias, Dicrodon, Euprepes, Lygosoma, Typhlops, Eryx, Rhynchonyx, Elapomorphus, Achalinus, Coronella, Dromicus, Xenopholis, Anoplodipsas, Spilotes, Tropidonotus). Monatsbericht der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1869, 432–447.

  56. QGIS (2022) QGIS Geographic Information System. QGIS. Association. Available in: https://qgis.org/pt_BR/site/ (accessed 1 March 2022)

  57. R Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed 1 March 2022)

  58. Ribas, C., Aleixo, A., Nogueira, A.C.R., Miyaki, C.Y. & Cracraf, J.A (2011) Palaeobiogeographic model for biotic diversification within Amazonia over the past three million years. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 279 (1729), 681–689. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1120

  59. Sabaj, M.H. (2020) Codes for natural collections in ichthyology and herpetology. Copeia, 108 (3), 593–669. https://doi.org/10.1643/ASIHCODONS2020

  60. Schlegel, H. (1837) Essai sur la Physionomie des Serpens. Partie descriptive. Vol. 1. Kips & Van Stockum, La Haye, 606 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.4693

  61. Schoenherr, C.J. (1836) Genera et Species Curculionidum, cum Synonymia Hujus Familiæ. Tomus III. Librairie Encyclopedique de Roret, Paris, 858 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.8952

  62. Siler, C.D., Oliveros, C.H., Santanen, A. & Brown, R.M. (2013) Multilocus phylogeny reveals unexpected diversification patterns in Asian Wolf snakes (genus Lycodon). Zoologica Scripta, 42 (3), 262–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12007

  63. Stejneger, L. (1901) An annotated list of batrachians and reptiles collected in the vicinity of La Guaira, Venezuela, with descriptions of two new species of snakes. Proceedings United States National Museum, 24, 179–192. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.24-1248.179

  64. Torres-Carvajal, O. & Terán, C. (2021) Molecular phylogeny of parrot snakes (Serpentes: Colubrinae: Leptophis) supports underestimated species richness. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 164 (2021), 107267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2021.107267

  65. Torres-Carvajal, O., Echevarría, L.Y., Lobos, S.E., Venegas, P.J. & Kok, P.J.R. (2019) Phylogeny, diversity and biogeography of Neotropical sipo snakes (Serpentes: Colubrinae: Chironius). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 130, 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2018.10.022

  66. Uetz, P., Freed, P, Aguilar, R. & Hošek, J. (Eds.) (2022) The Reptile Database. Available in: http://www.reptile-database.org (accessed 1 November 2022)

  67. Uzzell, T. (1973) A revision of lizards of the genus Prionodactylus, with a new genus for P. leucostictus and notes on the genus Euspondylus (Sauria, Teiidae). Postilla, 159, 1–67. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.11535

  68. Vanzolini, P.E. (1981) The scientific and political contexts of the Bavarian Expedition to Brasil. In: Adler, K. (Ed.), Herpetology of Brazil, Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Lawrence, pp. 9–29.

  69. Wagler, J. (1824) Serpentum Brasiliensium Species Novae, ou Histoire naturelle des Espèces Nouvelles de Serpens. Munich France Seraph. Hiibschmann, Monaco, 75 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.4269

  70. Wagler, J.G. (1830) Natürliches system der Amphibien: mit vorangehender Classification der Säugethiere und Vögel: ein Beitrag zur vergleichenden Zoologie. J.G. Cotta, Munich, 354 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.58730

  71. Wallace, A.R. (1852) On the monkeys of the Amazon. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 20, 107–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/037454809494374

  72. Wallach, V., Williams, K.L. & Boundy, J. (2014) Snakes of the World. A Catalogue of Living and Extinct Species. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1209 pp.

  73. Werner, F. (1897) Ueber einige neue oder seltene Reptilien und Frösche der zoologischen Sammlung des Staates München. Sitzungsberichte der mathematisch-physikalischen Classe der königlich bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu München, 27, 203–220.

  74. Werner, F. (1913) Neue oder seltene Reptilien und Frösche des Naturhistorischen Museums in Hamburg. Jahrbuch der Hamburgischen Wissenschaftlichen Anstalten, 30, 1–51. [1912]

  75. Wied, M.A.P. (1824) Verzeichniss der Amphibien, welche im zweiten Bande der Naturgeschichte Brasiliens vom Prinz Maximillian von Neuwied beschrieben werden. Isis von Oken, 14, 661–673.

  76. Zaher, H., Grazziotin, F.G., Cadle, J.E., Murphy, R.W., Moura-Leite, J.C. & Bonatto, S.L. (2009) Molecular phylogeny of advanced snakes (Serpentes, Caenophidia) with an emphasis on South American Xenodontines: a revised classification and descriptions of new taxa. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, 49 (11), 115–153. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0031-10492009001100001

  77. Zaher, H., Murphy, R.W., Arredondo, J.C., Graboski, R., Machado-Filho, P.R., Mahlow, K.K., Montingelli, G.G., Quadros, A.B., Orlov, N.L., Wilkinson, M., Zhang, Y.P. & Grazziotin, F.G. (2019) Large-scale molecular phylogeny, morphology, divergence-time estimation, and the fossil record of advanced caenophidian snakes (Squamata: Serpentes). PloS ONE, 14 (5), e0216148. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216148

  78. Zaher, H. (1999) Hemipenial morphology of the South American xenodontine snakes, with a proposal for a monophyletic Xenodontinae and a reappraisal of colubroid hemipenes. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 240, 1–168.