Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Article
Published: 2021-03-19
Page range: 151–183
Abstract views: 218
PDF downloaded: 22

Four new species of Phrynus, Lamarck (Arachnida: Amblypygi) from Mexico

Unidad de Ecología y Sistemática (UNESIS), Laboratorio de Entomología, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Bogotá, Colombia. Carrera 7 N°. 40–62, Bogotá.
Arachnida America Biodiversity Endemism Phrynidae Whip-spiders

Abstract

Mexico is the country with the largest diversity of the genus Phrynus (Amblypygi: Phrynidae); however, many species could remain hidden due to the conservative morphology of the group. Two of the Mexican species, P. operculatus, and P. jalisco show enough variation, between populations from different localities, to be considered as possible species complexes. The scarce taxonomic information of these species and the few analyses of their variation could cause misidentifications and sub estimation of the diversity. Specimens morphologically similar to P. operculatus from different Mexican localities were analyzed, using characters from the male and female genitals. Four new species are described, presenting illustrations of SEM for the male genitals. Details of the morphologic variation in this group of species are discussed, as well as the usefulness of sexual characters like the size proportions, and sclerotization in the female gonopods, and ornaments in males, to improve the diagnoses of the Mexican Phrynus. The known distribution of P. operculatus is large in comparison with those of the other species, after the result of this research, the possibility that it is a larger species complex is evident, thus, it is necessary to increase the morphologic and genetic population studies in this group.

 

References

  1. Armas, L.F. (1999) Ampliación del área de distribución de algunos Phrynus (Amblypygi: Phrynidae) y Centruroides (Scorpiones: Buthidae) de América Central y las Antillas. Cocuyo, 3, 29–30.

    Armas, L.F. (2006a) Sinopsis de los Amblipígidos Antillanos (Arachnida: Amblypygi). Boletín Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, 38, 223–245.

    Armas, L.F. (2006b) Los Amblypygidos Tendarapodos de México (Arachnida: Amblypygi). Boletín Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, 39, 345–359.

    Armas, L.F. (2014) Los Amblypygios de Cuba (Arachnida: Amblypygi). Revista Ibérica de Aracnología, 24, 29–51.

    Armas, L.F. & Angarita, A. (2008) Nueva espécie de Phrynus Lamark, 1801 (Amblypygi: Phrynidae) de Colombia. Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, 43, 25–28.

    Armas, L.F. & Gadar, Y. (2004) Nueva especie de Phrynus Lamarck, 1801 (Amblypygi: Phrynidae) de Chiapas, México. Revista Ibérica de Aracnología, 10, 133−136.

    Armas, L.F., Guzmán, A. & Francke, O. (2014) Una especie nueva de Phrynus (Amblypygi: Phrynidae) de México. Revista Ibérica de Aracnología, 25, 3–7.

    Armas, L.F. & Pérez, A. (2001) Los Amblipígidos de República Dominicana (Arachnida: Amblypygi). Revista Ibérica de Aracnología, 3, 47–66.

    Armas, L.F. & Víquez, C. (2001) Nueva especie de Phrynus (Amblypygi: Phrynidae) de Costa Rica. Revista Ibérica de Aracnología, 4, 11–15.

    Armas, L.F., Víquez, C. & Trujillo, R. (2013) Nueva especie de Phrynus Lamarck, 1801 (Amblypygi: Phrynidae) de Guatemala y Honduras. Revista Ibérica de Aracnología, 23, 25–31.

    Ávila-Calvo, A.F. & Armas, L.F. de (1997) Lista de los Amblipígidos (Arachnida: Amblypygi) de México, Centroamérica y las Antillas. Cocuyo, 6, 31–32.

    Börner, C. (1902a) Arachnologische Studien. (II und III). Zoologischer Anzeiger, 25, 433–466.

    Börner, C. (1902b) Koenenia mirabilis und andere Pedipalpen. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft, 12, 214–215.

    Börner, C. (1904) Beitrage zur Morphologie der Arthropoden. I. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Pedipalpen. Zoologica, Stuttgart, 42, 1–174.

    https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.59544

    Brown, J.K., Frohlich, D.R. & Rosell, R.C. (1995) The sweetpotato or silverleaf whiteflies: biotypes of Bemisia tabaci or a species complex?. Annual Review of Entomology, 40(1), 511–534.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.40.010195.002455

    Butler, A.G. (1873) List of the species of Galeodides, with description of a new species in the collec- tion of the British Museum. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1873, 415–425

    Butler, A.G. (1879) Respecting a new distinction between the species of the genus Phrynus of authors. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 5, 4, 313–316.

    https://doi.org/10.1080/00222937908679834

    Caporiacco, L. di (1951) Studi sugli Aracnidi del Venezuela raccolti dalla Sezione di Biologia (Universitá Centrale del Venezuela). 1 Parte: Scorpiones, Opiliones, Solifuga y Chernetes. Acta Biologica Venezuelica, 1, 1–46.

    Chirivi, D. (2017) A new species of Phrynus Lamarck, 1801 (Arachnida: Amblypygi), from Trinidad and Tobago, and Venezuela, with a redescription of Phrynus pulchripes (Pocock, 1894). Zootaxa, 4254 (3), 357–374.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4254.3.4

    Chirivi, D. & Armas, L.F. (2012) La subfamília Phryninae (Amblypygi: Phrynidae) en Colombia. Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, 50, 395–402.

    Chirivi, D., Moreno, J. & Fagua, G. (2020) Two new species of the whip-spider genus Heterophrynus (Arachnida: Amblypygi) with complementary information of four species. Zootaxa, 4803 (1), 1–41.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4803.1.1

    Coddington, J.A., Larcher, S.F. & Cokendolpher, J.C. (1990) The systematic status of Arachnida, exclusive of Acari, in North America north of Mexico. In: Kosztarab, M. & Schaefer, C.W. (Eds.), Systematics of the North American insects and arachnids: status and needs. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, pp. 5–20.

    Colmenares, P. & Villarreal, O. (2008) Una nueva especie de Phrynus Lamarck, 1801 (Amblypygi: Phrynidae), de La Sierra de Perijá, Venezuela. Boletín Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, 43, 89–93.

    Comstock, J.H. (1913) The spider book. Doubleday, Page and Co., New York, 746 pp.

    De Queiroz, K. (2007) Species Concepts and Species Delimitation. Systematic Biology, 56 (6), 879–886.

    https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150701701083

    Duminil, J., D., Kenfack, D., Viscosi, V., Grumiau, G. & Hardy, O. (2012) Testing species delimitation in sympatric species complexes: The caseof an African tropical tree, Carapa spp. (Meliaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 62, 275–285.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2011.09.020

    Esposito, L.A., Bloom, T., Caicedo-Quiroga, L., Alicea-Serrano, A.M., Sánchez-Ruíz, J.A., May-Collado, L.J., Binford, G.J. & Agnarsson, I. (2015) Islands within islands: Diversification of tailless whip spiders (Amblypygi, Phrynus) in Caribbean caves. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 93, 107–117.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2015.07.005

    Franganillo, P. (1926) Arácnidos nuevos o poco conocidos de la Isla de Cuba. Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica de España, 9, 42–68.

    Franganillo, P. (1931) Excursiones aracnológicas durante el mes de Agosto de 1930. Revista Belén, La Habana, 24, 44–49 + 116–120 + 168–171 + 219–224 + 285–288.

    Franganillo, P. (1936) Los Arácnidos de Cuba hasta 1936. Cultural S.A., La Habana, 178 pp.

    Gervais, P. (1844) Histoire Naturelle des Insectes. Aptères. Vol. 3. Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret, Paris, 494 pp.

    Giupponi, A. & Kury, A. (2013) Two new species of Heterophrynus Pocock, 1894 from Colombia with distribution notes and a new synonymy (Arachnida: Amblypygi: Phrynidae). Zootaxa, 3647 (2), 329–342.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3647.2.5

    Guzmán, A., Chirivi, D. & Francke, O. (2015) The first troglomorphic species of the genus Phrynus Lamarck, 1801 (Amblypygi: Phrynidae) from Mexico. Zootaxa, 3920 (3), 474–482.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3920.3.6

    Hansen, H.J. (1893) Organs and characters in different orders of arachnids. Entomologiske Meddelelser, 4, 135–251.

    Harvey, M.S. & West, P. (1998) New species of Charon (Amblypygi, Charontidae) from Northern Australia and Christmas Island. The Journal of Arachnology, 26, 273–284.

    Harvey, M.S. (2003) Catalogue of the smaller arachnid orders of the world: Amblypygi, Uropygi, Schizomida, Palpigradi, Ricinulei and Solifugae. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, 385 pp.

    https://doi.org/10.1071/9780643090071

    International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. (2017) Opinion 2396 (Case 2169)—Phrynus Lamarck, 1801 (Arachnida, Amblypygi): conserved. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 74, 108–110. [SSN 2057-0570, online]

    https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v74.a026

    Jiménez, M.L. & Llinas-Gutierrez, J. (2004) Description of male Phrynus asperatipes (Wood) (Phrynidae: Amblypygi) from Baja California Sur, Mexico. Journal of Arachnology, 32, 862–865.

    https://doi.org/10.1636/H03-42.1

    Kästner, A. (1932) Pedipalpi Latreille = Geissel Scorpione. In: Kükenthal, W. (Ed.), Handbuch der Zoologie. Vol. 3 (2)(2). Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin und Leipzig. pp. 1–76.

    Koch, C.L. (1840) Die Arachniden. Getreu nach der Natur Abgebildet und Beschrieben. Vol. 8. C.H. Zeh’schen, Nürnberg, 220 pp.

    Koch, C.L. (1850) Übersicht des Arachnidensystems. Vol. 5. J.L. Lotzbeck, Nürnberg, 552 pp.

    Kraepelin, K. (1895) Revision der Tarantuliden Fabr. Verhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg, 13 (3), 3–53.

    Kraepelin, K. (1901) Catalogue des Pédipalpes des collections du Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle de Paris. Bulletin du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, 7, 263–264.

    Lamarck, J.B. (1801) Systême des animaux sans vertèbres, ou Tableau général des classes, des ordres et des genres de ces animaux; Présentant leurs caractères essentiels et leur distribution, d’après la considération de leurs rapports naturels et leur organisation, et suivant l’arrangement établis dans les galeries du Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle, parmi leur dépouilles conservées; Précédé du discours d’ouverture du cours de zoologie, donné dans le Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle l’an 8 de la République. Déterville, Paris, viii + 432 pp.

    https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.116650

    Latreille, P.A. (1804) Histoire naturelle, generale et particulière, des Crustacés et des Insectes. Vol. 7. F. Dufart, Paris, 866 pp.

    Lichtenstein, A.A.H. & Herbst, J.F.W. (1797) Naturgeschichte der Insekten-Gattungen Solpuga und Phalangium. In: Herbst, J.F.W. (Ed.), Natursystem der Ungeflügelten Insekten. Vol. 1. G.A. Lange, Berlin, pp. 1–88.

    Mello-Leitão, C. (1931) Pedipalpos do Brasil e algumas notas sobre a ordem. Archivos do Museu Nacional, 33, 7–72.

    Millot, J. (1949a) Classe de Arachnides (Arachnida). I. Morphologie générale et anatomie interne. In: Grassé, P.P. (Ed.), Traité de zoologie. Vol. 6. Masson, Paris, pp. 263–319.

    Millot, J. (1949b) Ordre des Amblypyges. In: Grassé, P.P. (Ed.), Traité de zoologie. Vol. 6. Masson, Paris, pp. 563–588.

    Pereyaslawzewa, S. (1897a) Les premiers stades du développement de Pédipalpes. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris, 125, 319–321.

    Pereyaslawzewa, S. (1897b) Les derniers stades du développement de Pédipalpes. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris, 125, 377–380.

    Petrunkevitch, A. (1925) Arachnida from Panama. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 27, 51–248.

    Petrunkevitch, A. (1949) A study of Palaeozoic Arachnida. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 37, 69–315.

    Pinto-da-Rocha, R. (1997) Systematic review of the Neotropical family Stygnidae (Opiliones, Laniatores, Gonyleptoidea). Arquivos de Zoologia, Museu da Universidade de São Paulo, 33 (4), 163–342.

    https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-7793.v33i4p163-342

    Pocock, R.I. (1894a) Contributions to our knowledge of the arthropod fauna of the West Indies. III. Supplement on the Pedipalpi of the West Indies. Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology, 2, 527–542.

    Pocock, R.I. (1894b) Notes on the Pedipalpi of the family Tarantulidae contained in the collection of the British Museum. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 6, 14 (82), 273–298.

    https://doi.org/10.1080/00222939408677804

    Pocock, R.I. (1902) Arachnida: Scorpiones, Pedipalpi & Solifugae. In: Godman, F.D. & Salvin, O. (Eds.), Biologia Centrali Americana. Vol. 3. Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 1–71.

    Quintero, D. (1981) The Amblypygid genus Phrynus in the Americas (Amblypygi, Phrynidae). Journal of Arachnology, 9, 117–166.

    Reveillion, F., Wattier, R., Montuire, S., Souça-Carvalho, L. & Bollache, L. (2020) Cryptic diversity within three South American whip spider species (Arachnida, Amblypygi). Zoological Research, 41 (5), 595–598.

    https://doi.org/10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2020.068

    Seiter, M., Reyes Lerma, A.C., Král, J., Sember, K., Divisová, K., Palacios-Vargas, J.G., Colmenares, P.A., Loria, S.F. & Prendini, L. (2020) Cryptic diversity in the whip spider genus Paraphrynus (Amblypygi: Phrynidae): integrating morphology, karyotype, and DNA. Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny, 78 (2), 265–285.

    https://doi.org/10.26049/ASP78-2-2020-04

    Shultz, J.W. (1999) Muscular anatomy of a whipspider, Phrynus longipes (Pocock) (Arachnida: Amblypygi), and its evolutionary significance. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 126, 81–116.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1999.tb00608.x

    Speijer, E.A.M. (1936) Die orientalischen Pedipalpi des Zoologischen Museums der Universität Berlin. Mitteilung aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin, 21, 249–263.

    Teruel, R., Armas, L.F. & Rodríguez, T. (2009) Nuevos datos sobre la distribucioìn geograìfica y ecologiìa de los amblipiìgidos de cuba (Arachnida: Amblypygi). Boletín Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, 44, 201–211.

    Vázquez-Rojas, I. (1995) Los aracnidos de Mexico parte 1: Ricinulei, Amblypygi, Solifugae, Palpigradi, Schizomida, Uropygi. Dugesiana, 2, 15–37.

    Vázquez-Rojas, I. (1996) Amblypygi. In: Llorente Bousquets, J.E., García Aldrete, A.N. & González Soriano, E. (Eds.), Biodiversidad, taxonomía y biogeografía de artrópodos de México: hacia una síntesis de su conocimiento. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F, pp. 71–73.

    Vásquez, S., Chirivi, D., Garcia, A., Matilla-Meluk, H. & Torres, J. (2019) Variación morfológica en Heterophrynus boterorum (Arachnida: Amblypygi: Phrynidae). Biota Colombiana, 20 (2), 32–45.

    https://doi.org/10.21068/c2019.v20n02a03

    Villaseñor, J. (2016) Checklist of the native vascular plants of Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 87, 559–902.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmb.2016.06.017

    Víquez, C. & Armas, L.F. (2006) Los Amblipígidos (Arachnida: Amblypygi) de Guatemala. In: Cano, E. (Ed.), Biodiversidad de Guatemala. Vol 1. Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala, pp. 307–318.

    Werner, F. (1935) Klasse: Arachnoidea, Spinnentiere. Pedipalpen. In: Bronn, H.G. (Ed.), Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs. Vol. 5(IV)(8)(3). Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig, pp. 317–490.

    Weygoldt, P. (1977) Kampf, Paarungsverhalten, Spermatophorenmorphologie und weibliche Genitalien bei neotropischen Geisselspinnen (Amblypygi, Arachnida). Zoomorphologie, 86, 271–286.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993669

    Weygoldt, P. (2000) Whip Spiders (Chelicerata: Amblypygi): their biology, morphology and systematics. Apollo Books, Stenstrup, 163 pp.

    Wood, H.C. (1863) Description of new species of North American Pedipalpi. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 15, 107–112.

    Zakhvatkin, A.A. (1952) Subdivision of the mites (Acarina) into orders and the position of these in the system of the Chelicerata. Parazitologicheskii Sbornik Zoologicheskii Institut Akademii Nauk SSSR, 12, 5–46.