Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Article
Published: 2019-12-10
Page range: 401–407
Abstract views: 492
PDF downloaded: 135

The disconnect between DNA and species names: lessons from reptile species in the NCBI taxonomy database

Center for the Study of Biological Complexity, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23284, USA.
National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20894, USA
Center for the Study of Biological Complexity, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23284, USA.
Genbank Reptile Database DNA sequence nomenclature type specimens synonymy

Abstract

We compared the species names in the Reptile Database, a dedicated taxonomy database, with those in the NCBI taxonomy database, which provides the taxonomic backbone for the GenBank sequence database. About 67% of the known ~11,000 reptile species are represented with at least one DNA sequence and a binary species name in GenBank. However, a common problem arises through the submission of preliminary species names (such as “Pelomedusa sp. A CK-2014”) to GenBank and thus the NCBI taxonomy. These names cannot be assigned to any accepted species names and thus create a disconnect between DNA sequences and species. While these names of unknown taxonomic meaning sometimes get updated, often they remain in GenBank which now contains sequences from ~1,300 such “putative” reptile species tagged by informal names (~15% of its reptile names). We estimate that NCBI/GenBank probably contain tens of thousands of such “disconnected” entries. We encourage sequence submitters to update informal species names after they have been published, otherwise the disconnect will cause increasing confusion and possibly misleading taxonomic conclusions.

References

  1. Adamowicz, S.J. (2015) International Barcode of Life: evolution of a global research community. Genome, 58, 151–162.

    https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2015-0094

    Benson, D.A., Cavanaugh, M., Clark, K., Karsch-Mizrachi, I., Lipman, D.J., Ostell, J. & Sayers, E.W. (2017) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Research, 45, D37–D42.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1070

    Benson, D.A., Karsch-Mizrachi, I., Clark, K., Lipman, D.J., Ostell, J. & Sayers, E.W. (2012) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Research, 40, D48–D53. [database issue]

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1178

    Chambers, E.A. & Hebert, P.D. (2016) Assessing DNA barcodes for species identification in North American reptiles and amphibians in natural history collections. PLoS One, 11, e0154363.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154363

    Ciufo, S., Kannan, S., Sharma, S., Badretdin, A., Clark, K., Turner, S., Brover, S., Schoch, C.L., Kimchi, A. & DiCuccio, M. (2018) Using average nucleotide identity to improve taxonomic assignments in prokaryotic genomes at the NCBI. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 68, 2386–2392.

    https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.002809

    Federhen, S. (2012) The NCBI Taxonomy database. Nucleic Acids Research, 40, D136–143.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1178

    Federhen, S. (2015) Type material in the NCBI taxonomy database. Nucleic Acids Research, 43, D1086–98.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1127

    Heinicke, M.P., Turk, D. & Bauer, A.M. (2017) Molecular phylogeny reveals strong biogeographic signal and two new species in a Cape Biodiversity Hotspot endemic mini-radiation, the pygmy geckos (Gekkonidae: Goggia). Zootaxa, 4312 (3), 449–470.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4312.3.3

    Karsch-Mizrachi, I., Takagi, T. & Cochrane, G. (2017) The international nucleotide sequence database collaboration. Nucleic Acids Research, 46 (D1), D48–D51.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1097

    Sayers, E.W., Cavanaugh, M., Clark, K., Ostell, J., Pruitt, K.D. & Karsch-Mizrachi, I. (2019) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Research, 47 (D1), D94–D99.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky989

    Schoch, C.L., Aime, M.C., de Beer, W., Crous, P.W., Hyde, K.D., Penev, L., Seifert, K.A., Stadler, M., Zhang, N. & Miller, A.N. (2017) Using standard keywords in publications to facilitate updates of new fungal taxonomic names. IMA Fungus, 8 (2), 70–73.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03449466

    Sharma, S., Ciufo, S., Starchenko, E., Darji, D., Chlumsky, L., Karsch-Mizrachi, I. & Schoch, C.L. (2018) The NCBI BioCollections Database. Database, Oxford, 2018, bay006.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bay006

    Tillack, F., Ziegler, T. & Le Khac Quyet (2004) Eine neue Art der Gattung Boiga Fitzinger 1826 (Serpentes: Colubridae: Colubrinae) aus dem zentralen Vietnam. Sauria, 26 (4), 3–13.

    Uetz, P. & Garg, A. (2017) Molecular taxonomy: Species disconnected from DNA sequences. Nature, 545 (7655), 412.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/545412c

    Uetz, P., Freed, P. & Hošek, J. (2019) The Reptile Database. Available from: http://www.reptile-database.org (accessed 10 July 2019)

    Uetz, P. & Stylianou, A. (2018) The original descriptions of reptiles and their subspecies. Zootaxa, 4375 (2), 257–264.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4375.2.5