Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Correspondence
Published: 2019-06-27
Page range: 147–150
Abstract views: 89
PDF downloaded: 5

Spreadsheets to expedite taxonomic publications by automatic generation of morphological descriptions and specimen lists

División Aracnología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”—CONICET. Av. Ángel Gallardo 470, C1405DJR, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
General

Abstract

It is now generally accepted that we are going through a major mass extinction event that is causing biodiversity loss at alarming rates (Barnosky et al. 2011). We also know that many species remain to be formally described (e.g. Huber 2014), and concerns have been raised as to whether we will be able to document these before they go extinct (Costello et al. 2013). On one hand, the number of recognized species increases exponentially (e.g. Agnarsson et al. 2013; Sangster & Luksenburg 2015). On the other, taxonomic descriptions are becoming more complete and detailed, which is necessarily more time-consuming, leading to an overall decline in the number of species described per taxonomist (Sangster & Luksenburg 2015). In this scenario, any method or protocol that increases efficiency in taxonomic descriptions is welcome.

 

References

  1. Agnarsson, I., Coddington, J.A. & Kuntner, M. (2013) Systematics: progress in the study of spider diversity and evolution. In: Penney, D. (Ed.), Spider sesearch in the 21st century: trends & perspectives. Siri Scientific Press, Manchester, pp. 58–111.

    Barnosky, A.D., Matzke, N., Tomiya, S., Wogan, G.O.U., Swartz, B., Quental, T.B., Marshall, C., McGuire, J.L., Lindsey, E.L., Maguire, K.C., Mersey, B. & Ferrer, E.A. (2011) Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature, 471, 51–57.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09678

    Brown, B.V. (2013) Automating the “Material examined” section of taxonomic papers to speed up species descriptions.
    Zootaxa, 3683 (3), 297–299.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3683.3.8

    Costello, M.J., May, R.M. & Stork, N.E. (2013) Can we name Earth’s species before they go extinct? Science, 339, 413–416.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230318

    Huber, B.A. (2014) Progress and prospects in taxonomy: what is our goal and are we ever going to reach it? Journal of Arachnology, 42, 142–147.

    https://doi.org/10.1636/CK13-69.1

    Izquierdo, M.A. & Ramírez, M.J. (2017) Taxonomic revision of the jumping goblin spiders of the genus Orchestina Simon, 1882, in the Americas (Araneae, Oonopidae). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 410, 1–362.

    https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0090-410.1.1

    Magalhaes, I.L.F. & Ramírez, M.J. (2019) The crevice weaver spider genus Kukulcania (Araneae: Filistatidae). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 426, 1–151.

    https://doi.org/10.1206/00030090-426.1.1

    Sangster, G. & Luksenburg, J.A. (2015) Declining rates of species described per taxonomist: slowdown of progress or a side-effect of improved quality in taxonomy? Systematic Biology, 64, 144–151.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syu069

    WSC (2019) World Spider Catalog. Version 20.0. Natural History Museum of Bern, Bern.

    https://doi.org/10.24436/2