Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Article
Published: 2019-02-12
Page range: 101–112
Abstract views: 66
PDF downloaded: 2

Cranial morphology and osteology of the sexually dimorphic electric fish, Compsaraia samueli Albert & Crampton (Apteronotidae, Gymnotiformes), with comparisons to C. compsa (Mago-Leccia)

University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.
2Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary, Gloucester Point, VA, 23062, USA.
Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, SE 49100-000, Brazil.
University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, AM 69067-375, Brazil.
Reptilia Rio Negro suspensorium biodiversity morphometrics Apteronotidae Gymnotiformes osteology dimorphism

Abstract

Sexual dimorphism of the snout has evolved independently in at least four separate clades of the gymnotiform family Apteronotidae. This phenomenon may help identify sex, except in the absence of mature individuals, and has led to confused taxonomy for several species. We examined a large collection of Compsaraia samueli collected during the breeding season from a remote stream in the Rio Negro drainage. This collection contains a wide range of sizes of both sexes, but most individuals were easily identified as mature. To quantify the sexual dimorphism of these specimens, 15 measurements were taken from the head and the body. In addition, some specimens were cleared-and-stained to study cranial osteology. We found that long-snouted males of C. samueli span a wide range of body sizes. As the snout length increases the distance between the eye and the occiput does not increase at the same rate, suggesting that it is only the anterior portion of the head that has an increased allometry. Skeletal anatomy differs between the sexes in that the lower jaw is more triangular in females and more linear in males. The coronomeckelian is small and round in females in contrast to being longer and pointed in males. There is strong interlacing of the dentary and anguloarticular bones in males, whereas this contact is not as extensive in females. We also discuss the implications of sexual dimorphism for identification of this species relative to its congener (C. compsa), and for the evolution of sexual dimorphism in the family.

 

References

  1. Albert, J.S. (2001) Species diversity and phylogenetic systematics of American knifefishes (Gymnotiformes, Teleostei). Miscellaneous Publications Museum Zoology, University of Michigan, 190, 1–127.

    Albert, J.S. & Crampton, W.G.R. (2005) Diversity and phylogeny of Neotropical electric fishes (Gymnotiformes). In: Bullock, T.H., Hopkins, C.D., Popper, A.N. & Fay, R.R. (Eds.), Electroreception. Springer, New York, pp. 360–409.

    Albert, J.S. & Crampton, W.G.R. (2009) A new species of electric knifefish, genus Compsaraia (Gymnotiformes: Apteronotidae) from the Amazon River, with extreme sexual dimorphism in snout and jaw length. Systematics and Biodiversity, 7 (1), 81–92.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1477200008002934

    Basolo, A.L. (1990) Female preference for male sword length in the green swordtail, Xiphophorus helleri (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Animal Behavior, 40 (2), 332–338.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80928-5

    Bernt, M.J., Crampton, W.G., Orfinger, A.B. & Albert, J.S. (2018) Melanosternarchus amaru, a new genus and species of electric ghost knifefish (Gymnotiformes: Apteronotidae) from the Amazon Basin. Zootaxa, 4378 (4), 451–479.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4378.4.1

    Chao, N.L. (2001) The fishery, diversity, and conservation of ornamental fishes in the Rio Negro Basin, Brazil–a review of Project Piaba (1989–1999). In: Chao, N.L., Petry, P., Prang, G., Sonneschien, L. & Tlusty, M. (Eds.), Conservation and Management of Ornamental Fish Resources of the Rio Negro Basin, Amazonia, Brazil-Projeto Piaba. Editora da Universidade do Amazonas, Manaus, pp. 161–204.

    Cox Fernandes, C. (1998) Sex-related morphological variation in two species of apteronotid fishes (Gymnotiformes) from the Amazon River Basin. Copeia, 1998 (3), 730–735.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/1447805

    Cox Fernandes, C., Lundberg, J.G. & Riginos, C. (2002) Largest of all electric-fish snouts: hypermorphic facial growth in male Apteronotus hasemani and the identity of Apteronotus anas (Gymnotiformes: Apteronotidae). Copeia, 2002 (1), 52–61.

    https://doi.org/10.1643/0045-8511(2002)002[0052:LOAEFS]2.0.CO;2

    Cox Fernandes, C., Lundberg, J.G. & Sullivan, J.P. (2009) Oedemognathus exodon and Sternarchogiton nattereri (Apteronotidae, Gymnotiformes): the case for sexual dimorphism and conspecificity. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 158 (1), 193–207.

    https://doi.org/10.1635/053.158.0110

    Cox Fernandes, C., Smith, G.T., Podos, J., Nogueira, A., Inoue, L., Akama, A., Ho, W.W. & Alves-Gomes, J. (2010) Hormonal and behavioral correlates of morphological variation in an Amazonian electric fish (Sternarchogiton nattereri: Apteronotidae). Hormones and Behavior, 58 (4), 660–668.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.06.006

    Darwin, C. (1859) On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. Edition 1. John Murray, London, 502 pp.

    Darwin, C. (1871) The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. Edition 1. John Murray, London, 423 pp.

    de Santana, C.D. & Crampton, W.G. (2007) Revision of the deep-channel electric fish genus Sternarchogiton (Gymnotiformes: Apteronotidae). Copeia, 2007 (2), 387–402.

    https://doi.org/10.1643/0045-8511(2007)7[387:ROTDEF]2.0.CO;2

    de Santana, C.D. & Vari, R.P. (2010) Electric fishes of the genus Sternarchorhynchus (Teleostei, Ostariophysi, Gymnotiformes); phylogenetic and revisionary studies. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 159 (1), 223–371.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2009.00588.x

    Dingerkus, G. & Uhler, L.D. (1977) Enzyme clearing of alcian blue stained whole small vertebrates for demonstration of cartilage. Stain Technology, 52 (4), 229–232.

    https://doi.org/10.3109/10520297709116780

    Evans, K.M., Bernt, M.J., Kolmann, M.A., Ford, K.L. & Albert, J.S. (2018) Why the long face? Static allometry in the sexually dimorphic phenotypes of Neotropical electric fishes. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1–17.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zly076

    Grande, L. (2004) Categorizing various classes of morphological variation, and the importance of this to vertebrate paleontology. In: Arratia, G. & Tintori, A. (Eds.), Mesozoic Fishes 3 – Systematics, Paleoenvironments and Biodiversity. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, Munich, pp. 123–136.

    Hagedorn, M. & Heiligenberg, W. (1985) Court and spark: electric signals in the courtship and mating of gymnotoid fish. Animal Behavior, 33 (1), 254–265.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(85)80139-1

    Hilton, E.J. & Bemis, W.E. (2012) External morphology of shortnose sturgeon, Acipenser brevirostrum (Acipenseriformes: Acipenseridae), from the Connecticut River, with notes on variation as a natural phenomenon. In: Kynard, B., Bronzi, P. & Rosenthal, H. (Eds.), Life History and Behaviour of Connecticut River Shortnose and Other Sturgeons. World Society of Sturgeon Conservation, Norderstedt, pp. 243–265.

    Hilton, E.J. & Cox Fernandes, C. (2006) Sexual dimorphism in Apteronotus bonapartii (Gymnotiformes: Apteronotidae). Copeia, 2006 (4), 826–833.

    https://doi.org/10.1643/0045-8511(2006)6[826:SDIABG]2.0.CO;2

    Hilton, E.J. & Cox Fernandes, C. (2017) Identity of “Apteronotusbonapartii (Castelnau, 1855), a sexually dimorphic South American knifefish from the Amazon, with notes on its cranial osteology and on the taxonomic status of “Apteronotusapurensis Fernández-Yépez, 1968 (Gymnotiformes, Apteronotidae). Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 165 (1), 91–103.

    https://doi.org/10.1635/053.165.0109

    Hilton, E.J., Cox Fernandes, C., Sullivan, J.P., Lundberg, J.G. & Campos-da-Paz, R. (2007) Redescription of Orthosternarchus tamandua (Boulenger, 1898) (Gymnotiformes, Apteronotidae), with reviews of its ecology, electric organ discharges, external morphology, osteology, and phylogenetic affinities. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 156 (1), 1–26.

    https://doi.org/10.1635/0097-3157(2007)156[1:ROOTBG]2.0.CO;2

    Lachner, E.A. (1952) Studies of the biology of cyprinid fishes of the chub genus Nocomis of northeastern United States. The American Midland Naturalist, 48 (2), 433–466.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/2422260

    Mago-Leccia, F. (1994) Electric Fishes of the Continental Waters of America. Vol. 29. Biblioteca de la Academia de Ciencias Fisicas, Matematicas, y Naturals, Caracas. 206 pp.

    National Space Development Agency of Japan (NASDA) Earth Observation Center (1993) JERS-1 SAR Data Users Handbook, NASDA EORC, Tokyo. 24 pp.

    Petzold, J.M. & Smith, G.T. (2016) Androgens regulate sex differences in signaling but are not associated with male variation in morphology in the weakly electric fish Parapteronotus hasemani. Hormones and Behavior, 78, 67–71.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.10.014

    Pyron, M. (1996) Sexual size dimorphism and phylogeny in North American minnows. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 57 (4), 327–341.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1996.tb01854.x

    Rapp Py-Daniel, L.H. & Cox Fernandes, C. (2005) Dimorfismo sexual em Siluriformes e Gymnotiformes (Ostariophysi) da Amazonia. Acta Amazonica, 35 (1), 97–110.

    https://doi.org/10.1590/S0044-59672005000100015

    Schultz, E.T. (1993) Sexual size dimorphism at birth in Micrometrus minimus (Embiotocidae ): a prenatal cost of reproduction. Copeia, 1993 (2), 456–463.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/1447145