Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Article
Published: 2018-11-09
Page range: 487–500
Abstract views: 82
PDF downloaded: 2

Molecular insights into the phylogenetic placement of the poorly known genus Niceforonia Goin & Cochran, 1963 (Anura: Brachycephaloidea)

Biological Collections, Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Villa de Leyva, Boyacá, Colombia
Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom
Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
Department of Biology, University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia, USA
Department of Biology, University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia, USA
Amphibia Terrarana Holoadeninae incertae sedis Phrynopus Isodactylus


Among New World direct-developing frogs belonging to the clade Brachycephaloidea (= Terraranae), there are several genera with uncertain phylogenetic placements. One notable example is the genus Niceforonia Goin & Cochran 1963, which includes three species that are endemic to Colombia. Three specimens of the species Niceforonia nana were collected and for the first time the genus is included in a molecular phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial (mtDNA; 12S and 16S) and nuclear (nucDNA; TYR and RAG1) markers. Molecular phylogenetic inference based on concatenated and separate mtDNA and nucDNA analyses recovered Niceforonia nana nested within Hypodactylus Hedges et al. 2008, rendering the latter genus paraphyletic. Consequently, herein we place the genus Hypodactylus in the synonymy of Niceforonia to resolve the paraphyly and place Niceforonia in the subfamily Hypodactylinae. Based on our revised concept of the genus Niceforonia we conducted preliminary morphological comparisons using specimens and literature descriptions. Finally, Nicefornia nana is quite divergent from other species of Niceforonia (uncorrected genetic distances of ca. 10% 16S and 7% TYR) suggesting that further taxonomic revision may be warranted.



  1. Ardila-Robayo, M.C., Ruiz-Carranza, P.M. & Barrera-Rodriguez, M. (1996) Una nueva especie de Phrynopus (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae) de La Cordillera Central Colombiana. Lozania, 67, 1–10.

    Ardila-Robayo, M.C. & Acosta-Galvis, A.R. (2000) Anfibios. In: Rangel, J.O. (Ed.), Colombia diversidad biótica III. La región de vida paramuna. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Bogotá, pp. 617–628.

    Bernal, M.H. & Lynch, J.D. (2008) Review and Analysis of Altitudinal Distribution of the Andean Anurans in Colombia. Zootaxa, 1826 (1), 1–25.

    Buitrago-González, W., López-Guzmán, J.H. & Vargas-Salinas, F. (2016) Niceforonia adenobrachia Ardila-Robayo, Ruiz-Carranza, and Barrera-Rodríguez, 1996 (Amphibia: Anura: Craugasoridae): extension of geographical distribution in the Central Andes of Colombia. Check List, 12 (1), 1845.

    Canedo, C. & Haddad, C.F.B. (2012) Phylogenetic relationships within anuran clade Terrarana, with emphasis on the placement of Brazilian Atlantic rainforest frog genus Ishnocnema (Anura: Brachycephalidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 65, 610–620.

    Castro, F., Herrera, M.I. & Lynch, J.D. (2004) Niceforonia adenobrachia. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2017.1. Available from: (accessed 28 September 2017)

    Chaparro, J.C., Padial, J.M., Gutierrez, R.C. & de la Riva, I. (2015) A new species of Andean frog of the genus Bryophryne from southern Peru (Anura: Craugastoridae) and its phylogenetic position, with noted on the diversity of the genus. Zootaxa, 3994 (1), 94–108.

    Cochran, D.M. & Goin. C.J. (1970) Frogs of Colombia. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., 655 pp.

    de Sá, R.O., Streicher, J.W., Sekonyela, R., Forlani, M., Loader, S., Greenbaum, E., Richards, S. & Haddad, C.F.B. (2012) Molecular phylogeny of microhylid frogs (Anura: Microhylidae) with emphasis on relationships among New World genera. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 12, 241.

    Edgar, R.C. (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research, 32, 1792–1797.

    Feng, Y-J., Blackburn, D.C., Liang, D., Hillis, D.M., Wake, D.B., Cannatella, D.C. & Zhang, P. (2017) Phylogenomics reveals rapid, simultaneous diversification of three major clades of Gondwanan frogs at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 114, E5864–5870.

    Ferro, J.M., Taffarel, A., Cardozo, D., Grosso, J., Puig, M.P., Suarez, P., Akmentins, M.S. & Baldo, D. (2016) Cytogenetic characterization and B chromosome diversity in direct-developing frogs of the genus Oreobates (Brachycephaloidea, Craugastoridae). Comparative Cytogenetics 10, 141–156.

    Frost, D.R., Grant, T., Faivovich, J., Bain, R.H., Haas, A., Haddad, C.F.B., de Sá, R.O., Channing, A., Wilkinson, M., Donnellan, S.C., Raxworthy, C.J., Campbell, J.A., Blotto, B.L., Moler, P., Drewes, R.C., Nussbaum, R.A., Lynch, J.D., Green, D.M. & Wheeler, W.C. (2006) The amphibian tree of life. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 297, 1–371.;2

    Goin, C.J. & Cochran, D.M. (1963) Two new genera of leptodactylid frogs from Colombia. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, Series 4, 31, 499–505.

    Gonzalez-Duran, G.A., Targino, M., Rada. M. & Grant, T. (2017) Phylogenetic relationships and morphology of the Pristimantis leptolophus species group (Amphibia: Anura: Brachycephaloidea), with the recognition of a new species group in Pristimantis Jimenez de la Espada, 1870. Zootaxa, 4243 (1), 42–74.

    Hedges, S.B., Duellman, W.E. & Heinicke. M.P. (2008a) New World direct-developing frogs (Anura: Terrarana): molecular phylogeny, classification, biogeography, and conservation. Zootaxa, 1737, 1–182.

    Hedges, S.B., Duellman, W.E. & Heinicke, M.P. (2008b) A replacement name for Isodactylus Hedges, Duellman, & Heinicke 2008. Zootaxa, 1795, 67–68.

    Heinicke, M.P., Barrio-Amoros, C.L. & Hedges, S.B. (2015) Molecular and morphological data support recognition of a new genus of New World direct-developing frog (Anura: Terrarana) from an under-sampled region of South America. Zootaxa, 3986 (2), 151–172.

    Heinicke, M.P., Lemmon A.L., Lemmon, E.M., McGrathc, K. & Hedges, S.B. (2018) Phylogenomic support for evolutionary relationships of New World direct developing frogs (Anura: Terraranae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 118, 145–155.

    Heyer, W.R. (1975) A preliminary analysis of the intergeneric relationships of the frog family Leptodactylidae. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 199, 1–55.

    Kearse, M., Moir, R., Wilson, A., Stones-Havas, S., Cheung, M., Sturrock, S. & Thierer, T. (2012) Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics, 28, 647–1649.

    Lanfear, R., Calcott, B., Ho, S.Y. & Guindon, S. (2012) PartitionFinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 29 (6), 1695–1701.

    Llano-Mejía, J., Cortés-Gómez, Á.M. & Castro-Herrera, F. (2010) Lista de anfibios y reptiles del departamento del Tolima, Colombia. Biota Colombiana, 11 (1–2), 89–177.

    Lynch, J.D. (1968) Systematic status of some Andean Leptodactylid frogs with a description of a new species of Eleutherodactylus. Herpetologica, 24 (4), 289–300.

    Lynch, J.D. (1971) Evolutionary relationships, osteology, and zoogeography of leptodactylid frogs. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History Miscellaneous Publications, 53, 1–238.

    Lynch, J.D. (1975) A review of the Andean leptodactylid frog genus Phrynopus. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas, 35, 1–51.

    Lynch, J.D. & Duellman, W.E. (1980) The Eleutherodactylus of the Amazonian Slopes of the Ecuadorian Andes (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Miscellaneous publications of the University of Kansas Museum of Natural History, 69, 1–89.

    Miller, M.A., Pfeiffer, W. & Schwartz, T. (2010) Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), New Orleans, Louisiana, 14 November 2010, pp. 1–8.

    Padial, J.M., Grant, T. & Frost, D. (2014) Molecular systematics of terraranas (Anura: Brachycephaloidea) with an assessment of the effects of alignment and optimality criteria. Zootaxa, 3825 (1), 1–132.

    Pyron, R.A. & Wiens, J.J. (2011) A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 species, and a revised classification of advanced frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 61, 543–583.

    Romero-Garcia, J., Clavijo-Garzon, S. & Bernal-Bautista, M.H. (2015) The advertisement call of three highland endemic species (Anura: Craugastoridae) from the Andean mountains of Colombia. Zootaxa, 4007 (2), 298–300.

    Ronquist, F., Teslenko, M., Van Der Mark, P., Ayres, D L., Darling, A., Höhna, S. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology, 61 (3), 539–542.

    Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A. & Kumar, S. (2007) MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30, 2715–2729.

    Tonini, J.F.R., Forlani, M.C. & de Sá, R.O. (2014) A new species of Chiasmocleis (Microhylidae. Gastrophryninae) from the Atlantic forest of Espirito Santo State, Brazil. Zookeys, 428, 109–132.

    Stamatakis, A. (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics, 30, 1312–1313.

    Streicher, J.W., Miller, E.C., Guerrero, P.C., Correa, C., Ortiz, J.C., Crawford, A.J., Pie, M.R. & Wiens, J.J. (2018) Evaluating methods for phylogenomic analyses, and a new phylogeny for a major frog clade (Hyloidea) based on 2214 loci. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 119, 128–143.

    Werner, F. (1899) Ueber Reptilien und Batrachier aus Columbien und Trinidad. Verhandlungen des Zoologisch-Botanischen Vereins in Wien, 49, 470–484.