Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Correspondence
Published: 2016-05-12
Page range: 100–100
Abstract views: 52
PDF downloaded: 2

Corrigendum: Redescription of Nemachilichthys rueppelli, a senior synonym of N. shimogensis (Teleostei: Nemacheilidae)

Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, G1 Block, Dr. Homi Bhabha Road, Pashan, Pune 411008, India Department of Biodiversity, M.E.S. Abasaheb Garware College, Karve Road, Pune, Maharashtra 411004, India
Department of Zoology, Modern College of Arts, Science and Commerce, Ganeshkhind, Pune 411053, India
Bombay Natural History Society (BNHS), Hornbill House, Opp. Lion Gate, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Road, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400001, India
Center for Aquatic Germplasm Conservation of Inland Aquatic Organisms, Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies (KUFOS), Kochi 682506, India
Center for Taxonomy of Aquatic Animals, Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies (KUFOS), Kochi 682506, India Systematics, Ecology and Conservation Laboratory, Zoo Outreach Organization, 96 Kumudham Nagar, Vilankurichi Road, Coimbatore 641035, India
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, G1 Block, Dr. Homi Bhabha Road, Pashan, Pune 411008, India Systematics, Ecology and Conservation Laboratory, Zoo Outreach Organization, 96 Kumudham Nagar, Vilankurichi Road, Coimbatore 641035, India
Nemachilichthys rueppelli N. shimogensis Teleostei Nemacheilidae Pisces

Abstract

In Keskar et al. (2015) we emended the original name Cobitis rupelli Sykes, 1839, because Sykes (1839) specifically mentions that the species was named after Rüppell. The specific epithet ‘rupelli’, with a single ‘p’, is an incorrect original spelling and should be emended into ‘ruppelli’ as required by Article 32.5 (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, 1999). However, citing Art 32.5.2.1, we also suggested that because Sykes (1839) named the species after Rüppell, the umlaut ‘ü’ should be corrected to ‘ue’ and that the specific epithet should thus be ‘rueppelli’. This is an error. Sykes (1839) did not use ‘ü’ in the original spelling of the species epithet rupelli: hence changing it to ‘ue’ is incorrect. Therefore, the correct spelling for the species should be ‘Nemachilichthys ruppelli’, a change that should be reflected in the title and in the rest of the text of Keskar et al. (2015).

References

  1. Keskar, A., Kumkar, P., Katwate, U., Ali, A., Raghavan, R & Dahanukar, N (2015) Redescription of Nemachilichthys rueppelli, a senior synonym of N. shimogensis (Teleostei: Nemacheilidae). Zootaxa, 4059 (3), 555–568.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4059.3.7

    Sykes, W.H. (1839) On the fishes of the Deccan. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1838 (6), 157–165.