Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Article
Published: 2013-11-29
Page range: 401–458
Abstract views: 49
PDF downloaded: 104

Using various lines of evidence to identify Chironomus species (Diptera: Chironomidae) in eastern Canadian lakes

Institut national de la recherche scientifique – Centre Eau Terre Environnement, 490 rue de la Couronne, Quebec City, Quebec, G1K 9A9, Canada.
Department of Genetics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, Bio21 Institute, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Institut national de la recherche scientifique – Centre Eau Terre Environnement, 490 rue de la Couronne, Quebec City, Quebec, G1K 9A9, Canada.
Chironomus morphology cytology DNA barcoding cox1 gb2β Canada

Abstract

Chironomus Meigen (Diptera, Chironomidae) larvae are usually the largest sediment-burrowing chironomids, and as such often constitute a major part of the freshwater infaunal biomass. However, use of this genus in ecological, environmental and paleoecological studies is hampered by the fact that Chironomus larvae are difficult to identify to species because the larvae of many species are morphologically similar. We used a combination of morphological, cytological and genetic techniques to distinguish Chironomus larvae collected from 31 water bodies located in eastern Canada, producing 17 distinguishable groupings. These groups of larvae were ultimately identified as belonging to 14 known species (C. anthracinus, C. bifurcatus, C. cucini, C. decorus-group sp. 2, C. dilutus, C. entis, C. frommeri, C. harpi, C. maturus, C. nr. atroviridis (sp. 2i), C. ochreatus, C. plumosus, C. staegeri and C. ‘tigris’) and three other species that remain unidentified (C. sp. NAI-III). No single approach served to delimit and identify larvae of all 17 Chironomus species that we collected. Although we expected that morphological criteria alone would be insufficient, our results suggest that DNA barcoding, using either the mitochondrial cox1 or the nuclear gb2β gene, was also inadequate for separating some Chironomus species. Thus we suggest that multiple approaches will often be needed to correctly identify Chironomus larvae to species.