Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Articles
Published: 2012-09-04
Page range: 62–63
Abstract views: 30
PDF downloaded: 1

Reply to ““Taxonomic certification versus the scientific method”: a rebuttal of Rogers (2012)” by Stribling et al., 2012

Kansas Biological Survey, Kansas University, Higuchi Hall, 2101 Constant Avenue, Lawrence, KS 66047-3759 USA
General Taxonomic certification scientific method

Abstract

I am grateful to Stribling et al., (2012) for pointing out two errors I made in my original opinion piece (Rogers, 2012), namely citing  Stribling et al., 2003 as Stribling et al., 2002, and stating that that same reference used the term “bench taxonomist” when in reality it was “production taxonomist”.

References

  1. North American Benthological Society (2009) Taxonomic Certification Programme. Available from: http://www.sfstcp.com/NABS-TCPHome/tabid/80/Default.aspx/ (Accessed 5 July 2012).

    Rogers, D.C. (2012) Taxonomic certification versus the scientific method. Zootaxa, 3257, 66–68.

    Stribling, J.B., Moulton, S.R., II & Lester, G.T. (2003) Determining the quality of taxonomi data. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 22, 621–631.

    Stribling, J., Sweeney, B., Morse, J., Corkum, G., Lester, G., Miller, S., Mitchell, R., Poulton, B., Strachan, S. & Wetzel, M. (2012a) “Taxonomic certification versus the scientific method”: a rebuttal of Rogers (2012). Zootaxa, 3359, 65–68.

    Stribling, J., Sweeney, B., Morse, J., Corkum, G., Lester, G., Miller, S., Mitchell, R., Poulton, B., Strachan, S. & Wetzel, M. (2012b) Erratum. “Taxonomic certification versus the scientific method”: a rebuttal of Rogers (2012). Zootaxa, 3383, 14.