Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Articles
Published: 2011-09-14
Page range: 66–68
Abstract views: 33
PDF downloaded: 15

The taxonomy’s new clothes: a little more about the DNA-based taxonomy

Laboratório de Biologia Comparada de Hymenoptera, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná. Caixa Postal 19.020, 81531-980 Curitiba, PR, Brazil Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná. CNPq fellowship
Laboratório de Biologia Comparada de Hymenoptera, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná. Caixa Postal 19.020, 81531-980 Curitiba, PR, Brazil Current Address: Departamento de Ciências Agrárias e Biológicas, Centro Universitário Norte do Espírito Santo, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (CEUNES/UFES). Rodovia BR-101 Norte, Km 60, Bairro Litorâneo, 29.932-540, São Mateus, ES, Brazil
General DNA-based taxonomy

Abstract

The use of DNA sequences, including DNA barcoding, as a taxonomical tool has been happening for some time (Tautz et al., 2003; Hajibabaei et al., 2007; Packer et al., 2009). However, the description of new species based solely on DNA sequences is a new idea (Cook et al., 2010) and a new practice (Brower, 2010). Our aim is not to further polarize the war between advocates of strictly molecular or strictly morphological systematics (following, e.g., Pires & Marinoni 2010). The objectives here are (i) to present some arguments regarding the perils of the proposition of a model (theory) for solely DNA-based descriptions (Cook et al. 2010) and the actual publication (practice) of such descriptions (Brower 2010), (ii) to discuss some reasons why we believe that adopting strictly DNA taxonomy for species description, setting aside everything we have learned from classic taxonomy, may not be the best alternative and (iii) to present the point of view about these matters of a PhD candidate and a recently graduated PhD working with taxonomy in a developing country.

References

  1. Brower, A.V.Z. (2006) Problems with DNA barcodes for species delimitation: ‘ten species’ of Astraptes fulgerator reassessed (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Systematics and Biodiversity, 4, 127–132.

    Brower, A.V.Z. (2010) Alleviating the taxonomic impediment of DNA barcoding and setting a bad precedent: names for ten species of ‘Astraptes fulgerator’ (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Eudaminae) with DNA-based diagnoses. Systematics and Biodiversity, 8, 485–491.

    Carvalho, M.R., Bockmann, F.A., Amorim, D.S., Brandão, C.R.F., de Vivo, M., Figueiredo, J.L., Britski, H.A., de Pinna, M.C.C., Menezes, N.A., Marques, F.P.L., Papavero, N., Cancello, E.M., Crisci, J.V., McEachran, J.D., Schelly, R.C., Lundberg, J.G., Gill, A.C., Britz, R., Wheeler, Q.D., Stiassny, M.L.J., Parenti, L.R., Page, L.M., Wheeler, W.C., Faivovich, J., Vari, R.P., Grande, L., Humphries, C.J., DeSalle, R., Ebach, M.C. & Nelson, G.J. (2007) Taxonomic impediment or impediment to taxonomy? A commentary on systematics and the cybertaxonomic-automation paradigm. Evolutionary Biology, 34, 140–143.

    Cook, L.G., Edwards, R.D., Crisp, M.D. & Hardy, N.B. (2010) Need morphology always be required for new species descriptions? Invertebrate Systematics, 24, 322–326.

    Darwin, C. (1872) The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. Sixth Edition. John Murray, London, 458pp.

    Ebach, M.C. & Carvalho, M.R. (2010) Anti-intellectualism in the DNA barcoding enterprise. Zoologia, 27, 165–178.

    Hajibabaei, M., Singer, G.A.C., Hebert, P.D.N. & Hickey, D.A. (2007) DNA barcoding: how it complements taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics and population genetics. Trends in Genetics, 23, 167–172.

    Hundsdoerfer, A.K. & Kitching, I.J. (2010) A method for improving DNA yield from century-plus old specimens of large Lepidoptera while minimizing damage to external and internal abdominal characters. Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny, 68, 151–155.

    International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Fourth Edition. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, Padova, XXIX + 306 pp.

    Lipscomb, D., Platnick, N. & Wheeler, Q. (2003) The intellectual content of taxonomy: a comment on DNA taxonomy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 65–66.

    Packer, L., Gibbs, J., Sheffield, C. & Hanner, R. (2009) DNA barcoding and the mediocrity of morphology. Molecular Ecology Resources, 9: 42–50.

    Pires, A.C. & Marinoni, L. (2010) DNA barcoding and traditional taxonomy unified through Integrative Taxonomy: a view that challenges the debate questioning both methodologies. Biota Neotropica, 10, 339–346.

    Prendini, L. (2005) Comment on "Identifying spiders through DNA barcodes". Canadian Journal of Zoology, 83, 498–504.

    Seberg, O., Humphries, C.J., Knapp, S., Stevenson, D.W., Petersen, G., Scharff, N. & Andersen, N.M. (2003) Shortcuts in systematics? A commentary on DNA-based taxonomy. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 63–65.

    Silva-Brandão, K.L., Lyra, M.L. & Freitas, A.V.L. (2009) Barcoding Lepidoptera: current situation and perspectives on the usefulness of a contentious technique. Neotropical Entomology, 38, 441–451.

    Tautz, D., Arctander, P., Minelli, A., Thomas, R.H. & Vogler, A.P. (2003) A plea for DNA taxonomy. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 70–74.