Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Articles
Published: 2011-07-08
Page range: 79–117
Abstract views: 33
PDF downloaded: 2

The Cause and Effect of Polarization: Thoughts on the “Morphological vs. Molecular Debate” in Systematics, with Examples from the Study of Sturgeons (Actinopterygii: Acipenseridae)

Department of Fisheries Science, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary, Gloucester Point, VA 23062, U.S.A
Department of Fisheries Science, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary, Gloucester Point, VA 23062, U.S.A
Fish Actinopterygii Acipenseridae

Abstract

As eloquently stated by Nelson and Ladiges (2001) in the passage above, the way that systematic data is analyzed almost certainly will affect how it becomes interpreted. Often the way in which data are analyzed will depend on the type of data being considered. Regardless of the methods employed or data under consideration, there are several levels to analysis and systematic studies - whether based on morphology or molecules. For Grande and Bemis (1998:647), this followed an empirical exploratory-analytical-explanatory progression, so that “no conscious assumptions about processes of speciation, completeness of the fossil record, geographical dispersal, specific ancestors, specific areas of endemism, or ‘true’ phylogenies” will bias the results of the analysis. We agree with this as a starting point, but rephrase and add to it here. In our view, systematic studies encompass four phases: 1, Data generation, which is equivalent to Grande and Bemis’ “empirical exploratory” phase, and for morphologically based studies this involves specimen examination and comparisons, whereas in molecular studies, this involves amplification and sequencing of specific genes; 2, Data analysis, which is similar to Grande and Bemis’ analytical phase, and involves “sorting” of data, already with hypotheses of homology in place (similarly scored characters, sequence alignment, etc.), by some method (parsimony, likelihood, or Bayesian), to search for patterns in the data. We see Grande and Bemis’ “explanatory” phase as encompassing two distinct yet interrelated activities: 3, data examination—an iterative process of checking and re-checking character definitions or character coding, often spurred on by primary homology statements being interpreted as homoplasies in light of other characters; and 4, data explanation, or interpretation of evolutionary scenarios (e.g., life history evolution, biogeography, etc.) based on the pattern of phylogeny resulting from the analysis of character data.

References

  1. Bemis, W.E., Findeis, E.K. & Grande, L. (1997) An overview of Acipenseriformes. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 48, 25–72.

    Berg, L.S. (1904) Zur Systematic der Acipenseriden. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 27, 665– 667.

    Billard, R. & Lecointre, G. (2001) Biology and conservation of sturgeon and paddlefish. Fish Biology and Fisheries, 10, 355–392.

    Birstein, V.J. (1993) Sturgeons and paddlefishes: threatened fishes in need of conservation. Conservation Biology, 7, 773–787.

    Birstein, V.J., Doukakis, P. & DeSalle, R. (2002) Molecular phylogeny of Acipenseridae: Nonmonophyly of Scaphirhynchinae. Copeia, 2002, 287–301.

    Britz, R. & Cambray, J.A. (2001) Structure of egg surfaces and attachment organs in anabantoids. Ichthylogical Explorations of Freshwaters, 12, 267–288.

    Buhay, J.E. (2009) “COI-like” sequences are becoming problematic in molecular systematic and DNA barcoding studies. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 29, 96–110.

    Carey, R.A. (2005) The Philosopher Fish: Sturgeon, caviar, and the geography of desire. Counterpoint, New York.

    Carlson, D.M. & Pflieger, W.L. (1981) Abundance and life history of the lake, pallid, and shovelnose sturgeons in Missouri. Final report, endangered species project SE-1–6, Missouri Department of Conservation, Je?erson City, MO, USA.

    Carlson, D.M., Pflieger, W.L., Trial, L. & Haverland, P.S. (1985) Distribution, biology and hybridization of Scaphirhynchus albus and S. platorynchus in the Missouri and Mississippi rivers. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 14, 51–59.

    Dillman, C.B., Wood, R.M., Kuhajda, B.R., Ray, J.M. Salnikov, V.B. & Mayden, R.L. (2007) Molecular Systematics of the Shovelnose Sturgeons (Scaphirhynchinae) of North America and Central Asia. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 23, 290–296.

    Fedrigo, O, Adams, D.C. & Naylor, G.J.P. (2005) DRUIDS-Detection of regions with unexpected internal deviation from statitonarity. Journal of Experminental Zoology Part B Molecular Development and Evolution, 304, 119–128.

    Findeis, E.K. (1993) Skeletal anatomy of the North American shovelnose sturgeon Scaphirhynchus platorynchus (Rafinesque, 1820) with comparisons to other Acipenseriformes. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Findeis, E.K. (1997) Osteology and phylogenetic relationships of recent sturgeons. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 48, 73–126.

    Grande, L. & Bemis, W.E. (1998) A comprehensive phylogenetic study of Amiid fishes (Amiidae) based on comparative skeletal anatomy. An empirical search for interconnected patterns of natural history. Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Memoir 4, Supplement to the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 18, 1–690.

    Grande, L. & Hilton, E.J. (2006) An exquisitely preserved skeleton representing a primitive sturgeon from the Upper Cretaceous Judith River Formation of Montana (Acipenseriformes: Acipenseridae: n. gen. and sp.). Journal of Paleontology, Memoir 65, supplement to 80, 1–39.

    Grande, L. & Hilton, E.J. (2009) A Replacement Name for †Psammorhynchus Grande & Hilton, 2006 (Actinopterygii, Acipenseriformes, Acipenseridae). Journal of Paleontology, 83, 317–318.

    Hilton, E.J. (2004) The caudal skeleton of Acipenseriformes (Actinopterygii: Chondrostei): Recent advances and new observations, in: Recent Advances in the Origin and Early Radiation of Vertebrates, G. Arratia, M. V. H. Wilson and R. Cloutier, eds. pp. 599–617. Verlag Dr. Pfeil, Munich.

    Hilton, E.J. (2005) Observations on the skulls of the sturgeons Acipenser stellatus and Pesudoscaphirhynchus kaufmanni (Acipenseridae). Environmental Biology of Fishes, 72, 135–144.

    Hilton, E.J. & Grande, L. (2006) Review of the fossil record of sturgeons, family Acipenseridae (Actinopterygii: Acipenseriformes), from North America. Journal of Paleontology, 80, 672–683.

    Hilton, E.J. & Forey, P.L. (2009) Redescription of †Chondrosteus acipenseroides Egerton, 1858 (Acipenseriformes, †Chondrosteidae) from the lower Lias of Lyme Regis (Dorset, England), with comments on the early evolution of sturgeons and paddlefishes, Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 7, 427–453.

    Hilton, E.J., Grande, L. & Bemis, W.E. (2011) Skeletal anatomy of the shortnose sturgeon, Acipenser brevirostrum Lesueur 1818, and the systematics of sturgeons (Acipenseriformes, Acipenseridae). Fieldiana (Life and Earth Sciences), 3, 1–168.

    Hoese, D.F. & Gill, A.C. (1993) Phylogenetic relationships of Eleotridid fishes (Perciformes: Gobioidei). Bulletin of Marine Science, 52, 415–440.

    Johnson, G.D. (1993) Percomorph phylogeny: progress and problems. Bulletin of Marine Science, 52, 3–28.

    Johnson, G.D., Paxton, J.R., Sutton, T.T., Satoh, T.P., Sado, T., Nishida, M. & Miya, M. (2009) Deep-sea mystery solved: aston94 · Zootaxa 2946 © 2011 DILLMAN & HILTON Magnolia Press ishing larval transformations and extreme sexual dimorphism unite three fish families. Biology Letters, 5, 235–239.

    Kishino, H. & Hasegawa, M. (1989) Evaluation of the Maximum Likelihood Estimate of the Evolutionary Tree Topologies from DNA Sequence Data, and the Branching Order in Hominoidea. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 29, 170–179.

    Kuhajda, B.R., Mayden, R.L. & Wood, R.M. (2007) Morphological comparisons of hatchery-reared specimens of Scaphirhynchus albus, S. platorynchus, and S. albus x S. platorynchus hybrids (Acipenseriformes: Acipenseridae). Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 23, 324–347.

    Leis, J.M., Olney, J.E. & Okiyama, M. (1997) Introduction to the proceedings of the symposium fish larvae and systematics: ontogeny and relationships. Bulletin of Marine Science, 60, 1–5.

    Maddison, D.R. & Maddison, W.P. (2000) MacClade 4: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.

    Mayden, R.L. & Kuhajda, B.R. (1996) Systematics, taxonomy, and conservation status of the endangered Alabama sturgeon, Scaphirhynchus suttkusi Williams and Clemmer (Actinopterygii, Acipenseridae). Copeia, 1996, 241–273.

    Miya, M., Takeshima, H., Endo, H., Ishiguro, N.B., Inoue, J.G., Mukai, T., Satoh, T.P., Yamaguchi, M., Kawaguchi, A., Mabuchi, K., Shirai, S.M. & Nishida, M. (2003) Major patterns of higher teleostean phylogenies: a new perspective based on 100 complete mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 26, 121–138.

    Mooi, R.D. & Gill, A.C. (2010) Phylogenies without synapomorphies – a crisis in fish systematics: time to show some character. Zootaxa, 2450, 26–40.

    Nelson, G. & Ladiges, P.Y. (2001) Gondwana, vicariance biogeography and the New York School revisited. Australian Journal of Botany, 49, 389–409.

    Patterson, C. & Johnson, G.D. (1997) The Data, the Matrix, and the Message: Comments on Begle's "Relationships of the Osmeroid Fishes. Systematic Biology, 46, 358–365.

    Paxton, J.R. & Johnson, G.D. (2005) Cetomimidae: Whalefishes; Mirapinniidae: tapetails & hariyfish; Megalomycteridae: bignose fishese. In: Richards, W.J. (Ed.). Early stages of Atlantic fishes. CRC Press, Boca Raton FL, pp.1089–1102.

    Ray, J.M., Dillman, C.B., Wood, R.M., Mayden, R.L. & Kuhajda, B.R. (2007) Microsatellite analysis of the endangered river sturgeons (Scaphirhynchus species) from the lower Mississippi River basin. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 23, 304–312.

    Rieppel, O. & Kearney, M. (2002) Similarity. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 75, 59–82.

    Saffron, I. (2002) Caviar: The strange history and uncertain future of the world’s most coveted delicacy. New York, Broadway Books.

    Schrey, A.W. & Heist, E.J. (2007) Stock structure of pallid sturgeon analyzed with microsatellite loci. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 23, 297–303.

    Simons, A.M., Wood, R.M., Heath, L.S., Kuhajda, B.R. & Mayden, R.L. (2001) Phylogenetics of Scaphirhynchus based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 130, 359–366.

    Smith, W.L. (2010) Promoting resolution of the percomorph bush: a reply to Mooi and Gill. Copeia, 2010, 3, 520–524.

    Swofford, D.L. (2002) PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.

    Templeton, A.R. (1983) Phylogenetic Inference from Restriction Endonucleas Cleavage Site maps with Particular Reference to the Evolution of Humans and the Apes. Evolution, 37, 221–244.

    Tranah, G., Kincaid, H.L., Krueger, C.C., Campton, D.E. & May, B. (2001) Reproductive isolation in sympatric populations of pallid and shovelnose sturgeon. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 21, 367–373.

    Tranah, G.H., Campton, D.E. & May, B. (2004) Genetic evidence for hybridization of pallid and shovelnose sturgeon. Journal of Heredity, 95, 474–480.

    Woese, C.R., Kandler, O. & Wheelis, M.L. (1990) Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 87, 4576–4579.