Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Articles
Published: 2011-07-08
Page range: 57–59
Abstract views: 78
PDF downloaded: 3

Complementary Approaches to Systematic Ichthyology

Professor and Curator of Marine Vertebrates, Marine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla CA 92093-0208,U.S.A.

Abstract

The molecular revolution in phylogenetic biology and its widespread application to fishes has in some ways complicated the task of teaching my craft of ichthyology. Beginning students know nothing of the history of fish classifications, how they were created, how they have changed over the years or how and why they continue to change. On the first day of class I typically bring in the four editions of Joe Nelson’s classic Fishes of the World (Nelson, 1976, 1984, 1994, 2006) to show students that systematic ichthyology is a vibrant and dynamic science and that these are exciting times. Then I add that the latest of these encyclopedias of our current knowledge has for the most part not incorporated the more radical changes in our understanding of fish relationships suggested by many recent analyses of molecular data. It is not difficult to imagine students’ frustration when one moment I tell them that the Scorpaeniformes is a long-recognized lineage of fishes, show them the distinctive morphological features shared by the group, then go on to say that the group is likely not monophyletic and that the character homologies upon which traditional diagnoses of the group were based are homoplasious (Imamura & Shinohara, 1997, 1998; Smith & Wheeler, 2004; Shinohara & Imamura, 2007). That realization may be exciting to some but must be nothing short of maddening to a novice. But in time, if my students and I do our jobs well, they too will learn to relish the vibrant science that systematic ichthyology continues to be.

References

  1. Berendzen, P.B., Olson, W.M. & Barron, S.M. (2009) The utility of molecular hypotheses for uncovering morphological diversity in the Notropis rubellus species complex (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae). Copeia, 2009, 661–673.

    Hastings, P.A. (1990) Phylogenetic relationships of tube blennies of the genus Acanthemblemaria (Pisces, Blennioidei). Bulletin of Marine Science, 47, 725–738.

    Hastings, P.A. (1992) Ekemblemaria lira, a new blennioid fish from Ecuador, with comments on sexual dimorphism and relationships in Ekemblemaria (Teleostei, Chaenopsidae). Copeia, 1992, 769–776.

    Hillis, D.M. & Weins, J.J. (2000) Molecules versus morphology in systematics. Conflicts, artifacts, and misconceptions. In:

    Weins, J.J. (ed). Phylogenetic Analysis of Morphological Data. Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington D.C., pp. 1–19.

    Imamura, H. & Shinohara, G. (1997) Phylogenetic studies of the order Scorpaeniformes (Pisces: Acanthopterygii): progress, present condition and problems. Bulletin of the National Science Museum, Tokyo, Series A, 24, 185–212.

    Imamura, H. & Shinohara, G. (1998) Scorpaeniform fish phylogeny: an overview. Bulletin of the National Science Museum (Tokyo), 24, 185–212.

    Jenner, R.A. (2004) Accepting partnership by submission? Morphological phylogenetics in a molecular millennium. Systematic Biology, 53, 333–342.

    Johnson, G.D., Paxton, J.R., Sutton, T.T., Satoh, T.P., Sado, T., Nishida, M. & Miya, M. (2009) Deep-sea mystery solved: astonishing

    larval transformations and extreme sexual dimorphism unite three fish families. Biology Letters. Evolutionary Biology, 5, 235–239.

    Lin, H.-C. (2009) Evolution of the Suborder Blennioidei: Phylogeny and Phylogeography of a Shallow Water Fish Clade. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of California San Diego.

    Lin, H.-C. & Hastings, P.A. (2011) Evolution of a Neotropical marine fish lineage (Subfamily Chaenopsinae, Suborder Blennioidei) based on phylogenetic analysis of combined molecular and morphological data. Molecular Phylogenetics & Evolution (2011), doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2011.04.018

    Lin, H.-C., Sanchez-Ortiz, C. & Hastings, P.A. (2009) Colour variation is incongruent with mitochondrial lineages: Cryptic speciation and subsequent diversification in a Gulf of California reef fish (Teleostei: Blennioidei). Molecular Ecology, 18, 2476–2488.

    Miya, M., Takeshima, H., Endo, H., Ishiguro, N.B., Inoue, J.G., Mukai, T., Satoh, T.P., Yamaguchi, M., Kawaguchi, A., Mabuchi, K., Shirai, S.M. & Nishida, M. (2003) Major patterns of higher teleostean phylogenies: a new perspective based on 100 complete mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics & Evolution, 26, 121–138.

    Mooi, R. & Gill, A. (2010) Phylogenies without synapomorphies – a crisis in fish systematics: Time to show some character. Zootaxa, 2450, 26–40.

    Nelson, J.S. (1976) Fishes of the World. Wiley-Interscience, New York. 416 pp.

    Nelson, J.S. (1984) Fishes of the World. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2nd edition. 523 pp.

    Nelson, J.S. (1994) Fishes of the World. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, 3rd edition. 600 pp.

    Nelson, J.S. (2006) Fishes of the World. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, 4th edition. 601 pp.

    Patterson, C. (Ed). (1987) Molecules and Morphology in Evolution: Conflict or Compromise? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Patterson, C., Williams, D.M. & Humphries, C.J. (1993) Congruence between molecular and morphological phylogenies. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics 24, 153–188.

    Pfeiler, E., Bitler, B.G., Ulloa, R., van der Heiden, A.M. & Hastings, P.A. (2008) Molecular identification of the bonefish Albula esuncula (Albuliformes: Albulidae) from the Tropical Eastern Pacific, with comments on distribution and morphology. Copeia, 2008, 763–770.

    Sandoval-Castillo, Rocha-Olivares, A., Villavicencio-Garayzar, C. & Balart, E. (2004) Cryptic isolation of Gulf of California shovelnose guitarfish evidenced by mitochondrial DNA. Marine Biology, 145, 983–988.

    Scottland, R.W., Olmstead, R.G. & Bennett, J.R. (2003) Phylogeny reconstruction; the role of morphology. Systematic Biology, 52, 539–548.

    Shinohara, G. & Imamura, H. (2007) Revisiting recent phylogenetic studies of "Scorpaeniformes". Ichthyological Research, 54, 92–99.

    Smith, W.L. & Wheeler, W.C. (2004) Polyphyly of the mail-cheeked fishes (Teleostei: Scorpaeniformes): evidence from mitochondrial and nuclear sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics & Evolution, 32, 627–646.

    Stephens, J.S. (1963) A revised classification of the blennioid fishes of the American family Chaenopsidae. University of California Publications in Zoology, 68, 1–165.

    Stephens, J.S. (1970) Seven new chaenopsid blennies from the western Atlantic. Copeia, 1970, 280–309.

    Weins, J.J. (2004) The role of morphological data in phylogeny reconstruction. Systematic Biology, 53, 653–661.