Abstract
Mooi & Gill (2010) argued that careful character study and well-understood synapomorphies do not have the strong role that they deserve as the basis for evidence in phylogenetics. We agree, but suggest that the problem is even greater. Not only character synapomorphies, but also other forms of phylogenetic evidence, typically do not receive the critical assessment that would support phylogenetic inference. In this paper, our goal is to not simply to highlight problems but to suggest solutions. We will suggest that a stronger role for corroboration assessment in systematics could overcome these problems in phylogenetic inference.
References
Faith, D.P. (1992) On corroboration: a reply to Carpenter. Cladistics, 8, 265–273.
Faith, D.P. (2004) From species to supertrees: Popperian corroboration and some current controversies in systematics. Australian Systematic Botany, 17, 1–16. 56 · Zootaxa 2946 © 2011 FAITH ET AL. Magnolia Press
Faith, D.P. (2006) Science and philosophy for molecular systematics: which is the cart and which is the horse? Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 38, 553–557.
Faith, D.P. (2011) Attempted tests of the surrogacy value of the ED environmental diversity measures highlight the need for corroboration assessment of surrogacy hypotheses. Ecological Indicators, 11, 745–748.
Faith, D.P. & Cranston, P.S. (1992) Probability, parsimony, and Popper. Systematic Biology, 41, 252–257.
Faith, D.P. & Trueman, J.W.H. (2001) Towards an inclusive philosophy for phylogenetic inference. Systematic Biology, 50, 331–350.
Friedrich, F. & Beutel, R.G. (2009) The thoracic morphology of Nannochorista (Nannochoristidae) and its implications for the phylogeny of Mecoptera and Antliophora. Journal of Zoological Systematics & Evolutionary Research, 48, 50–74.
Huelsenbeck, J.P. (1998) Systematic bias in phylogenetic analysis: is the Strepsiptera problem solved? Systematic Biology, 47, 519–537.
Lienau, E.K. & Desalle, R. (2009) Evidence, Content and Corroboration and the Tree of Life. Acta Biotheor, 57, 187–199.
Longhorn, S.J., Pohl, H.W. & Vogler, A.P. (2010) Ribosomal protein genes of holometabolan insects reject the Halteria, instead revealing a close affinity of Strepsiptera with Coleoptera. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 55, 846–859.
Mooi, R.D. & Gill, A.C. (2010) Phylogenies without Synapomorphies—A Crisis in Fish Systematics: Time to Show Some Character. Zootaxa, 2450, 1–25.
Osswald, J., Pohl, H. & Beutel, R.G. (2010) Extremely miniaturised and highly complex: The thoracic morphology of the first instar larva of Mengenilla chobauti (Insecta, Strepsiptera), Arthropod Structure & Development, 39, 287–304.
Padial, J.M. & de la Riva, I. (2010) A response to recent proposals for integrative taxonomy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 101, 747–756.
Popper, K. (1983) Realism and the aim of science. In: Bartley, W.W. (Ed.), Postscript to The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge, London.
Song, H., Sheffield, N.C., Cameron, S.L., Miller, K.B. & Whiting, M.F. (2010) When phylogenetic assumptions are violated: base compositional heterogeneity and among-site rate variation in beetle mitochondrial phylogenomics. Systematic Entomology, 35, 429–448.
Whiting, M.F., Carpenter, J.C., Wheeler, W.C. & Wheeler, Q.D. (1997) The Strepsiptera problem: Phylogeny of the holometabolous insect orders inferred from 18s and 28s ribosomal DNA sequences and morphology. Systematic Biology, 46, 1–68.
Whiting, M.F. (2005) Phylogenetic position of Diptera: Review of the evidence. In The Evolutionary Biology of Flies Edited by: Yeates DK, Wiegmann BM. Columbia University Press: New York: 3–13.
Whiting, M.F. & Karthirithamby, J. (1995) Strepsiptera do not share hind-wing veinational synapomorphies with the Coleoptera: a reply. Journal of the New York Entomological Society, 103, 1–14.
Wiegmann, B.M., Trautwein, M.D., Kim, J., Bertone, M., Winterton, S.L., Cassel, B.K. & Yeates, D.K. (2009) Single-copy nuclear genes resolve the phylogeny of the holometabolous insect orders. BMC Biology, 7, 34.
Yeates, D.K. & Wiegmann, B.M. (1999) Congruence and controversy: Toward a Higher-Level Phylogeny of Diptera. Annual Review of Entomology, 44, 397–428.