Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Articles
Published: 2010-12-09
Page range: 1–22
Abstract views: 32
PDF downloaded: 14

A new Central European species of the Daphnia curvirostris complex, Daphnia hrbaceki sp. nov. (Cladocera, Anomopoda, Daphniidae)

Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, Prague 2, CZ-128 44, Czech Republic
Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, Prague 2, CZ-128 44, Czech Republic
Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, Prague 2, CZ-128 44, Czech Republic
Crustacea taxonomy new species inducible defences ephippia ultrastructure

Abstract

Although systematics of the cladoceran genus Daphnia (Cladocera: Daphniidae) has been intensively investigated for decades using both morphological and genetic approaches, new lineages are being discovered on all continents, including in well-studied regions. Among Holarctic daphnids, Daphnia curvirostris Eylmann, 1887 held an interesting position, sharing some morphological characters of both the D. pulex and D. longispina groups. Recently, additional species of the D. curvirostris complex have been discovered in the Eastern Palaearctic. Here, we describe a new species in this complex from Central Europe, D. hrbaceki sp. nov. It was discovered in small, newly created fishless pools in the Czech Republic, and an additional sample of apparently the same taxon was collected in 1951 in Slovakia. D. hrbaceki is the closest yet known relative of D. curvirostris, but remains genetically divergent from all members of the complex (based on the sequences of three mitochondrial genes: 12S, COI, and ND2). In general, adult females of this species are morphologically very similar to D. curvirostris. Unlike the latter species, D. hrbaceki may develop a specific hump-shaped dorsal outline of the carapace, presumably an inducible defence against invertebrate predators. Juveniles of the new species occasionally form neckteeth, which may also be retained in adult individuals. The species also shows substantial variation in the size of spines in the middle pecten of the postabdominal claw, similarly as in the Japanese member of the species complex, D. tanakai Ishida, Kotov & Taylor, 2006. This variable character of spine size in the postabdominal middle pecten (a transition from the pulex to the longispina group character), as well as a bent and heavily setulated terminal seta on the male 2nd endopodite (considered as the pulex group character), are typical for the new species. D. hrbaceki also differs from D. curvirostris as well as other members of the complex in the ephippial surface ultrastructure. Our study demonstrates the utility of such ultrastructural characters in Daphnia taxonomical studies.

References

  1. Adamowicz, S.J., Petrusek, A., Colbourne, J.K., Hebert, P.D.N. & Witt, J.D.S. (2009) The scale of divergence: a phylogenetic appraisal of intercontinental allopatric speciation in a passively dispersed freshwater zooplankton genus. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 50, 423–436.

    Arnott, S.E. & Vanni, M.J. (1993) Zooplankton assemblages in fishless bog lakes: Influence of biotic and abiotic factors. Ecology, 74, 2361–2380.

    Benzie, J.A.H. (2005) The genus Daphnia (including Daphniopsis) (Anomopoda: Daphniidae). In Dumont, H. J. F. (ed.), Guides to the Identification of the Microinvertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World, 21. Kenobi Productions, Ghent & Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, 376 pp.

    Colbourne, J.K., Hebert, P.D.N. & Taylor, A.D. (1997) Evolutionary origins of phenotypic plasticity in Daphnia. In: Givnish, T.J. & Sytsma, K.J. (Eds.) Molecular Evolution and Adaptive Radiation. Cambridge University Press, pp. 163–188.

    Colbourne, J.K., Wilson, C.C. & Hebert, P.D.N. (2006) The systematics of Australian Daphnia and Daphniopsis (Crustacea: Cladocera): a shared phylogenetic history transformed by habitat-specific rates of evolution. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 89, 469–488.

    Černý, M. & Hebert, P.D.N. (1999) Intercontinental allozyme differentiation among four holarctic Daphnia species. Limnology and Oceanography, 44, 1381–1387.

    Dumont, H.J. (1974) Daphnia ambigua Scourfield, 1947 (Cladocera: Daphniidae) on the European continent. Biologisch Jaarboek - Dodonaea, 42, 112–116.

    Eylmann, E. (1887) Beitrag zur Systematik der europäischen Daphniden. Berichte der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft zu Freiburg I. B., 2, 61–148.

    Forró, L., Korovchinski, N.M., Kotov, A.A. & Petrusek, A. (2008) Global diversity of cladocerans (Cladocera; Crustacea) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia, 595, 177–184.

    Glagolev, S.M. (1995) Genus Daphnia. In: Alexeev, V.R. (Ed.) Key to freshwater invertebrates of Russia and adjacent lands, 2. Crustaceans. Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, pp. 48–58.

    Havel, J.E. & Dodson, S.I. (1984) Chaoborus predation on typical and spined morphs of Daphnia pulex: Behavioral observations. Limnology and Oceanography, 29, 487–494.

    Havel, J.E. & Medley, K.A. (2006) Biological invasions across spatial scales: intercontinental, regional, and local dispersal of cladoceran zooplankton. Biological Invasions, 8, 459–473.

    Hebert, P.D.N. (1995) The Daphnia of North America: an illustrated fauna. CD-ROM. University of Guelph, Guelph

    Herrick, C.L. (1884) A final report on the Crustacea of Minnesota, included in the orders Cladocera and Copepoda, together with a synopsis of the described species in North America, and keys to the known species of the more important genera. 12th annual report. Geological and natural history survey of Minnesota: Johnson, Smith & Harrison, Minneapolis, 191 pp.

    Ishida, S., Kotov, A.A. & Taylor, D.J. (2006) A new divergent lineage of Daphnia (Cladocera: Anomopoda) and its morphological and genetical differentiation from Daphnia curvirostris Eylmann, 1887. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 146, 385–405.

    Ishikawa, C. (1895) Phyllopod Crustacea of Japan. Daphnia whitmani. Zoological Magazine of Tokyo, 7, 147–154.

    Kořínek, V. (1999) A guide to limnetic species of Cladocera of African inland waters (Crustacea, Branchiopoda). Occasional Publication 1, International Association of Theoretical and Applied Limnology, Geneva, 57 pp.

    Kotov, A.A. & Taylor, D.J. (2010): A new African lineage of the Daphnia obtusa group (Cladocera: Daphniidae) disrupts continental vicariance patterns. Journal of Plankton Research, 32, 937–949.

    Kotov, A.A., Ishida, S. & Taylor, D.J. (2006) A new species in the Daphnia curvirostris (Crustacea: Cladocera) complex from the eastern Palearctic with molecular phylogenetic evidence for the independent origin of neckteeth. Journal of Plankton Research, 28, 1067–1079.

    Kvam, O.V. & Kleiven, O.T. (1995) Diel horizontal migration and swarm formation in Daphnia in response to Chaoborus. Hydrobiologia, 307, 177–184.

    Laforsch, C., Ngwa, W., Grill, W. & Tollrian, R. (2004) An acoustic microscopy technique reveals hidden morphological defenses in Daphnia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 15911–15914.

    Laforsch, C. & Tollrian, R. (2000) A new preparation technique of daphnids for Scanning Electron Microscopy using hexamethyldisilazane. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 149, 587–596.

    Louette, G. & De Meester, L. (2004) Rapid colonization of a newly created habitat by cladocerans and the initial build-up of a Daphnia-dominated community. Hydrobiologia, 513, 245–249.

    Mergeay, J., Verschuren, D. & De Meester, L. (2006) Invasion of an asexual American water flea clone throughout Africa and rapid displacement of a native sibling species. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 273, 2839–2844.

    Mergeay, J., Aguilera, X., Declerck, S., Petrusek, A., Huyse, T. & De Meester, L. (2008) The genetic legacy of polyploid Bolivian Daphnia: the tropical Andes as a source for the North and South American D. pulicaria complex. Molecular Ecology, 17, 1789–1800.

    Michels, E., Audenaert, E., Ortells, R. & De Meester, L. (2003) Population genetic structure of three pond-inhabiting Daphnia species on a regional scale (Flanders, Belgium). Freshwater Biology, 48, 1825–1839.

    Peters, R.H. & de Bernardi, R. (Eds.) (1987) Daphnia. Memorie dell'Instituto Italiano di Idrobiologia, 45, 1–502.

    Petrusek, A. (2003) The populations of the Daphnia similis species complex in Germany after 110 years—a new case of species introduction? Senckenbergiana biologica, 82, 11–14.

    Petrusek, A., Hobæk, A., Nilssen, J.P., Skage, M., Černý, M., Brede, N. & Schwenk, K. (2008) A taxonomic reappraisal of the European Daphnia longispina complex (Crustacea, Cladocera, Anomopoda). Zoologica Scripta, 37, 507–519.

    Petrusek, A., Tollrian, R., Schwenk, K., Haas, A. & Laforsch, C. (2009) A ”crown of thorns” is an inducible defense that protects Daphnia against an ancient predator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 2248–2252.

    Pfenninger, M. & Schwenk, K. (2007) Cryptic animal species are homogeneously distributed among taxa and biogeographical regions. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 7, 121.

    Posada, D. (2008) jModelTest: Phylogenetic Model Averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 25, 1253–1256.

    Repka, S., Walls, M. & Ketola, M. (1995) Neck spine protects Daphnia pulex from predation by Chaoborus, but individuals with longer tail spine are at a greater risk. Journal of Plankton Research, 17, 393–403.

    Riessen, H.P. & Young, J.D. (2005) Daphnia defense strategies in fishless lakes and ponds: one size does not fit all. Journal of Plankton Research, 27, 531–544.

    Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics, 19, 1572–1574.

    Santamaría, L. (2002) Why are most aquatic plants widely distributed? Dispersal, clonal growth and small-scale heterogeneity in a stressful environment. Acta Oecologica, 23, 137–154.

    Schwenk, K., Sand, A.B. & Brehm, M. (1998) Genetic markers, genealogies and biogeographic patterns in the cladocera. Aquatic Ecology, 32, 37–51.

    Schwenk, K., Posada, D. & Hebert, P.D.N. (2000) Molecular systematics of European Hyalodaphnia: the role of contemporary hybridization in ancient species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 267, 1833–1842.

    Swofford, D.L. (2002) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. [Computer software.] Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.

    Tamura, K., Dudley, J.N.M. & Kumar, S. (2007) MEGA4: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 24, 1596–1599.

    Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. & Gibson, T.J. (1994) Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research, 22, 4673–4680.

    Walpole, M.J. & Leader-Williams, N. (2002) Tourism and flagship species in conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 11, 543–547.

    Wellborn, G.A., Skelly, D.K. & Werner, E.E. (1996) Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater hydroperiod gradient. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 27, 337–363.

    Young, J.D. & Riessen, H.P. (2005) The interaction of Chaoborus size and vertical distribution determines predation effects on Daphnia. Freshwater Biology, 50, 993–1006.

    Zedler, P.H. (2003) Vernal pools and the concept of ‘isolated wetlands’. Wetlands, 23, 597–607.

    Žofková, M., Kořínek, V. & Černý, M. (2002) Two recent immigrants into Czech aquatic habitats: Daphnia ambigua and D. parvula (Crustacea: Cladocera). Acta Societatis zoologicae Bohemicae, 66, 221–230.