Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Articles
Published: 2009-08-18
Page range: 21–25
Abstract views: 49
PDF downloaded: 21

On the live holotype of the Galápagos pink land Iguana, Conolophus marthae Gentile & Snell, 2009 (Squamata: Iguanidae): is it an acceptable exception?

Laboratório de Sistemática e Ecologia Animal, Centro Universitário Vila Velha, Unidade Acadêmica II, Ciências Biológicas. Rua Comissário José Dantas de Mello 21, Boa Vista, Vila Velha, ES. 29102-770. Brazil
Reptilia International Code of Zoological Nomenclature Nomenclature taxonomy

Abstract

The Galápagos pink land iguana, Conolophus marthae Gentile & Snell, 2009 (Squamata: Iguanidae) is the latest example of a species being described without the proper deposition of a preserved onomatophore (name-bearing type specimen) in a taxonomic collection. Differently from other recent similar descriptions, the holotype of Conolophus marthae was marked with a Passive Integrated Transponder, allegedly allowing it to be tracked and found after its death, when it would be deposited at the Governmental Galápagos collection. Although apparently fulfilling the criteria of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, I here argue that this practice should not be followed and that the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature should urgently act to standardize criteria that should be met by those describing species found at the brink of extinction.

References

  1. Athreya, R. (2006) A new species of Liocichla (Aves: Timaliidae) from Eaglenest Wildlife Sanctuary, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Indian Birds, 2, 82–94.

    Banks, R.C., Goodman, S.M., Lanyon, S.M. & Schulenberg, T.S. (1993) Type specimens and basic principles of avian taxonomy. Auk, 110, 413–414.

    Donegan, T.M. (2008) Nomenclatural availability of nomina of new species or subspecies does not and should not require the deposition of dead specimens in collections. Zootaxa, 1761, 37–48.

    Dubois, A. & Nemésio, A. (2007) Does nomenclatural availability of nomina of new species or subspecies require the deposition of vouchers in collections? Zootaxa, 1409, 1–22.

    Gentile, G., Fabiani, A., Marquez, C., Snell, H.L., Snell, H.M., Tapia, W. & Sbordoni, V. (2009) An overlooked pink species of land iguana in the Galápagos. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 104, 507–511.

    Gentile, G. & Snell, H. (2009) Conolophus marthae sp. nov. (Squamata, Iguanidae), a new species of land iguana from the Galápagos archipelago. Zootaxa, 2201, 1–10.

    International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. (2008) Proposed amendment of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature to expand and refine methods of publication. Zootaxa, 1908, 57–67.

    Jones, T., Ehardt, C.L., Butynski, T.M., Davenport, T.R.B., Mpunga, N.E., Machaga, S.J. & De Luca, D.W. (2005) The highland mangabey Lophocebus kipunji: a new species of African monkey. Science, 308, 1161–1164.

    Landry, S.O. (2005) What constitutes a proper description? Science, 309, 2164.

    Mendes Pontes, A.R., Malta, A. & Asfora, P.H. (2006) A new species of capuchin monkey, genus Cebus Erxleben (Cebidae, Primates): found at the very brink of extinction in the Pernambuco Endemism Centre. Zootaxa, 1200, 1–12.

    Moser, M. (2005) Holotypic Ink. Science On Line. Available from: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/eletters/309/5744/2163c [accessed on 15.X.2007].

    Naish, D. (2006) The interesting and contentious discovery of the kipunji. Available from: http://darrennaish.blogspot.com/2006/06/interesting-and-contentious-discovery.html [accessed on 15.X.2007].

    Nemésio, A. (2009) Nomenclatural availability of nomina of new species should always require the deposition of preserved specimens in collections: a rebuttal to Donegan (2008). Zootaxa, 2045, 1–16.

    Oliveira, M.M. & Langguth, A. (2006) Rediscovery of Marcgrave’s Capuchin Monkey and designation of a neotype for Simia flavia Schreber, 1774 (Primates, Cebidae). Boletim do Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, (n.s.), 523, 1–16.

    Patterson, B.D. (2002) On the continuing need for scientific collecting of mammals. Journal of Neotropical Mammalogy, 9, 253–262.

    Polaszek, A., Grubb, P., Groves, C., Ehardt, C.L. & Butynski, T.M. (2005) What constitutes a proper description? Response. Science, 309, 2164–2166.

    Remsen Jr., J.V. (1995) The importance of continued collecting of bird specimens to ornithology and bird conservation. Bird Conservation International, 5, 145–180.

    Smith, E.F.G., Arctander, P., Fjeldså, J. & Amir, O.G. (1991) A new species of shrike (Laniidae: Laniarius) from Somalia, verified by DNA sequence data from the only known individual. Ibis, 133, 227–235.

    Timm, R.M., Ramey, R.R. II & The Nomenclature Committee of the American Society of Mammalogists. (2005) What constitutes a proper description? Science, 309, 2163–2164.

    Tzika, A.C., Rosa, S.F.P., Fabiani, A., Snell, H.L., Snell, H.M., Marquez, C., Tapia, W., Rassmann, K., Gentile, G. & Milinkovitch, M.C. (2008) Population genetics of Galápagos land iguana (genus Conolophus) remnant populations. Molecular Ecology, 17, 4943–4952.

    Wakeham-Dawson, A., Morris, S. & Tubbs, P. (2002) Type specimens: dead or alive? Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 59, 282–284.