Abstract
In the introduction of their most useful work on First-Reviser (FR) actions in ornithology, David et al. (2009) wrote: “It has been suggested that we should have drawn upon nomenclators. We have not done this. We did examine Neave (1939–1940) and noted that he made clear that in such cases his ‘signals’ were used to identify the first spelling, thus although he gives other spellings we do not consider he was deliberately selecting a spelling in the sense the Code expects.” This decision is a disputable one. According to the Code, any published choice for a scientific name or nomen (Dubois 2000) of a correct original spelling or eunym (Dubois 2000) among multiple original spellings qualifies as an FR action, whatever the “kind” of publication involved. Two kinds of sources were deliberately not examined by David et al. (2009) for their review, and should be so by subsequent authors: (1) the Zoological Record (ZR), published yearly since 1864, and which, especially in its early years, provided comments, nomenclatural acts, synonymisations and even new nomina and new morphonyms for existing nomina (Dubois 2000; e.g., justified and unjustified emendations or incorrect subsequent spellings); (2) the various Nomenclatores Zoologici published in the 19th and 20th century, such as Agassiz (1846 and previous editions), Apstein (1915), Sherborn (1932) and Neave (1939a-b, 1940a-b). All these works fully qualify as scientific publications, and they should be quoted whenever relevant. At least some of these sources include clear or questionable FR actions between multiple original spellings.References
Agassiz, L. (1846) Nomenclatoris zoologici index universalis. Jent & Gassmann, Soloduri, i–viii + 1–393.
Apstein, C. (1915) Nomina conservanda. Sitzungsbericht der Gesellschaft naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin, 1915 (5), 119–202.
David, N., Dickinson, E.C. & Gregory, S.M.S. (2009) Contributions to a list of First Reviser actions: ornithology. Zootaxa, 2085, 1–24.
Dubois, A. (2000) Synonymies and related lists in zoology: general proposals, with examples in herpetology. Dumerilia, 4 (2), 33–98.
Gould, J. (1838) Characters of a large number of new species of Australian birds. Proceedings of the zoological Society of London, 1837 [5], 138–157.
Mathews, G.M. (1925) The birds of Australia. Witherby, London, 12, part 2, 49–88.
Neave, S.A. (Ed.) (1939a) Nomenclator zoologicus. Vol. I. A-C. Zoological Society of London, London, i–xiv + 1–957.
Neave, S.A. (Ed.) (1939b) Nomenclator zoologicus. Vol. II. D-L. Zoological Society of London, London, i–iv + 1–1025.
Neave, S.A. (Ed.) (1940a) Nomenclator zoologicus. Vol. III. M-P. Zoological Society of London, London, i–iv + 1–1065.
Neave, S.A. (Ed.) (1940b) Nomenclator zoologicus. Vol. IV. Q-Z and supplement. Zoological Society of London, London, i–iv + 1–758.
Reichenbach, H.G.L. (1853) Das Natürliche System der Vögel. Handbuch der speciellen Ornithologie. Lief 3. Dresden, i–viii, 1–36, I–XXXI.
Sherborn, C.D. (1902) Index animalium. Cambridge University Press, London, i–lix + 1–1195.
Sherborn, C.D. (1932) Index animalium. Vol. 2. 1801–1850. Cambridge University Press, London, i–vii + cxxxiii–cxlvii + 1–1098.