Abstract
Taxonomic paradigms have changed several times during the history of taxonomy, yet a single nomenclatural system, socalled Linnaean, has remained in force all along. It is theory-free regarding taxonomy as it relies on ostensional allocation of nomina to taxa, rather than on intensional definitions of nomina (e.g., “phylogenetic definitions”). Nomina are not descriptions, definitions or theories but simple labels designating taxa. Both for theoretical and practical reasons, this system should be maintained for the allocation and validity of nomina under a cladistic taxonomic paradigm. Whereas taxa can be cladistically defined by apognoses or cladognoses, nomina should remain attached to taxa through onomatophores, combined in some cases with a Principle of Coordination. Under such a system, the allocation of nomina to taxa is automatic, unambiguous and universal, and nomenclature does not infringe upon taxonomic freedom. However, to avoid misunderstandings and to solve some current problems, the current Code of zoological nomenclature should be improved in several respects. The distinction should be made clear between taxonomic categories, which have biological definitions, and nomenclatural ranks, which do not, as they give only a position in a nomenclatural hierarchy: if used consistently under a cladistic paradigm, they simply allow to express hypotheses about successive branchings and sistertaxa relationships. Taxa referred to a given rank in different groups cannot therefore be considered equivalent by any biological criterion. The nomenclatural rules should cover the whole taxonomic hierarchy, which is currently not the case in zoology. The recent strong increase in the number of higher taxa which results from cladistic analyses may quickly lead to chaos and problems in communication if the nomina of these taxa continue to be based on personal tastes and opinions. There is an urgent need for the zoological Code to cover these nomina with automatic and stringent rules leaving no place to subjective interpretation. Just like for those currently covered by the Code, the status of these nomina should be established in their first publication (nomenclatural founder effect). The Code should be protected against alternative nomenclatural systems by rejecting as unavailable all nomina and nomenclatural acts published without respecting the basic Linnaean system of nomenclatural hierarchy of ranks.References
Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1997) Opinion 1873. Hemidactyliini Hallowell, 1856 (Amphibia, Caudata): conserved. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 54, 140–141.
Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1999) International code of zoological nomenclature. Fourth edition. London, International Trust for zoological Nomenclature, xxix + 306 pp.
Alonso-Zarazaga, M.A. (2005) Nomenclature of higher taxa: a new approach. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 62, 189–199.
Ashlock, P.D. (1971) Monophyly and associated terms. Systematic Zoology, 20, 63–69.
Ashlock, P.D. (1984) Monophyly: its meaning and importance. In: Duncan, T. & Stuessy, T. F. (Eds.), Cladistics: perspectives on the reconstruction of evolutionary history, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 39–46.
Ashlock, P.D. (1985) A revision of the Bergidea group: a problem in classification and biogeography (Hemiptera-Heteroptera: Lygaeidae). Journal of the Kansas entomological Society, “1984”, 57 (4), 675–688.
Avise, J.C. & Johns, G.C. (1999) Proposal for a standardized temporal scheme of biological classification for extant species. Proceeding of the national Academy of Sciences of the USA, 96, 7358–7363.
Avise, J. C. & Mitchell, D. (2007) Time to standardize taxonomies. Systematic Biology, 56, 130–133.
Benton, M.J. (2000) Stems, nodes, crown clades, and rank-free lists: is Linnaeus dead? Biological Reviews, 75, 633–648.
Bernardi, G. (1956) Contribution à l’étude des catégories taxonomiques. I. Avant-propos, nomenclature et définitions. Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France, 61, 194–200.
Bernardi, G. (1957) Contribution à l’étude des catégories taxonomiques. II. Les Règles internationales de la nomenclature zoologique et la notation des catégories taxonomiques. Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France, 62, 224–250.
Bernardi, G. (1980) Les catégories taxonomiques de la systématique évolutive. In: Bocquet, C., Génermont, J. & Lamotte, M. (Eds.), Les problèmes de l’espèce dans le règne animal, Vol. 3, Mémoires de la Société zoologique de France, 40, 373–425.
Bogart, J. P., Bi, K., Fu, J., Noble, D.W.A. & Niedzwiecki, J. (2007) Unisexual salamanders (genus Ambystoma) present a new reproductive mode for eucaryotes. Genome, 50, 119–136.
Bour, R. & Dubois, A. (1985) Nomenclature ordinale et familiale des Tortues (Reptilia). Studia geologica salmanticensia, vol. especial 1, Studia palaeocheloniologica, I, Ediciones Universidad, Salamanca, 77–86.
Bour, R. & Dubois, A. (1986) Nomenclature ordinale et familiale des Tortues (Reptilia). Note complémentaire. Bulletin mensuel de la Société linnéenne de Lyon, 55, 87–90.
Cracraft, J. (1974) Phylogenetic models and classification. Systematic Zoology, 23, 71–90.
Crochet, P.-A. (2007) Nomenclature of European plethodontid salamanders : Speleomantes Dubois, 1984 has precedence over Atylodes Gistel, 1868. Amphibia-Reptilia, 28, 170–172.
De Queiroz, K. & Gauthier, J. (1990) Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: phylogenetic definitions of taxon names. Systematic Zoology, 39, 307–322.
Dominguez, E. & Wheeler, Q. D. (1997) Taxonomic stability is ignorance. Cladistics, 13, 367–372.
Doolittle, W.F. (1999) Phylogenetic classification and the universal tree. Science, 284, 2124–2128.
Dubois, A. (1981) Hybridation interspécifique et notion du genre en zoologie. Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, (3), 292 (A), 201–203.
Dubois, A. (1986) A propos de l’emploi controversé du terme “monophylétique”: nouvelles propositions. Bulletin mensuel de la Société linnéenne de Lyon, 55, 248–254.
Dubois, A. (1987) Miscellanea taxinomica batrachologica (I). Alytes, “1986”, 5 (1–2), 7–95.
Dubois, A. (1988a) Some comments on the genus concept in zoology. Monitore zoologico italiano, (n. s.), 22, 27–44.
Dubois, A. (1988b) The genus in zoology: a contribution to the theory of evolutionary systematics. Mémoires du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, (A), 140, 1–123.
Dubois, A. (1991) Nomenclature of parthenogenetic, gynogenetic and “hybridogenetic” vertebrate taxons: new proposals. Alytes, 8, 61–74.
Dubois, A. (1997) An evolutionary biologist’s view on the science of biology. Alytes, 15 (3), 133–136.
Dubois, A. (1998) List of European species of amphibians and reptiles: will we soon be reaching “stability”? Amphibia-Reptilia, 19 (1), 1–28.
Dubois, A. (2000a) Nomenclature zoologique: quelques problèmes et besoins actuels. Bulletin de la Société française de Systématique, juin 2000, 24, 13–23.
Dubois, A. (2000b) Synonymies and related lists in zoology: general proposals, with examples in herpetology. Dumerilia, 4 (2), 33–98.
Dubois, A. (2003) The relationships between taxonomy and conservation biology in the century of extinctions. Comptes rendus Biologies, 326 (suppl. 1), S9–S21.
Dubois, A. (2004a) The higher nomenclature of recent amphibians. Alytes, 22 (1–2), 1–14.
Dubois, A. (2004b) Developmental pathway, speciation and supraspecific taxonomy in amphibians. 2. Developmental pathway, hybridizability and generic taxonomy. Alytes, 22 (1–2), 38–52.
Dubois, A. (2005a) Les règles de la nomenclature familiale en zoologie. In: Dubois, A., Poncy, O., Malécot, V. & Léger, N. (Eds.), Comment nommer les taxons de rang supérieur en zoologie et en botanique?, Biosystema, 23, 17–40.
Dubois, A. (2005b) Propositions pour l’incorporation des nomina de taxons de rang supérieur dans le Code international de nomenclature zoologique. In: Dubois, A., Poncy, O., Malécot, V. & Léger, N. (Eds.), Comment nommer les taxons de rang supérieur en zoologie et en botanique?, Biosystema, 23, 73–96.
Dubois, A. (2005c) Proposed Rules for the incorporation of nomina of higher-ranked zoological taxa in the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 1. Some general questions, concepts and terms of biological nomenclature. Zoosystema, 27 (2), 365–426.
Dubois, A. (2005d) Amphibia Mundi. 1.1. An ergotaxonomy of recent amphibians. Alytes, 23 (1–2), 1–24.
Dubois, A. (2005e) Proposals for the incorporation of nomina of higher-ranked taxa into the Code. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 62 (4), 200–209.
Dubois, A. (2006a) Proposed Rules for the incorporation of nomina of higher-ranked zoological taxa in the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 2. The proposed Rules and their rationale. Zoosystema, 28 (1), 165–258.
Dubois, A. (2006b) New proposals for naming lower-ranked taxa within the frame of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Comptes rendus Biologies, 329 (10), 823–840.
Dubois, A. (2006c) Incorporation of nomina of higher-ranked taxa into the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature: some basic questions. Zootaxa, 1337, 1–37.
Dubois, A. (2006d) Naming taxa from cladograms: a cautionary tale. Molecular Phylogenetics & Evolution, 42, 317–330.
Dubois, A. (2007a) Phylogeny, taxonomy and nomenclature: the problem of taxonomic categories and of nomenclatural ranks. Zootaxa, 1519, 27–68.
Dubois, A. (2007b) Naming taxa from cladograms: some confusions, misleading statements, and necessary clarifications. Cladistics, 23, 390–402.
Dubois, A. (2007c) Nomina zoologica linnaeana. In: Zhang, Z.-Q. & Shear, W.A. (Eds.), Linnaeus tercentenary: progress in invertebrate taxonomy, Zootaxa, 1668, 81–106.
Dubois, A. (2008a) Zoological nomenclature: some urgent needs and problems. In: Future trends in taxonomy, EDIT Symposium, Carvoeiro (Portugal), 21-23 January 2008, 15–18.
Dubois, A. (2008b) A partial but radical solution to the problem of nomenclatural taxonomic inflation and synonymy load. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 93, 857–863.
Dubois, A. (2008c) A family-series nomen based on a junior synonym is not thereby made invalid: the case of Adamansini Huber, 2007 (Cyprinodontiformes, Nothobranchiidae). Zootaxa, 1757, 66–68.
Dubois, A. (2008d) Drôles d’espèces. Hybridation, perturbations de la méiose et spéciation dans le règne animal: quelques points délicats de terminologie, d’éidonomie et de nomenclature. In: Prat, D., Raynal-Roques, A. & Roguenant, A. (Eds.), Peut-on classer le vivant? Linné et la systématique aujourd’hui, Belin, Paris, 169–202.
Dubois, A. (2008e) Le Code international de nomenclature zoologique: présentation, philosophie, règles majeures, problèmes actuels. In: Prat, D., Raynal-Roques, A. & Roguenant, A. (Eds.), Peut-on classer le vivant? Linné et la systématique aujourd’hui, Belin, Paris, 355–402.
Dubois, A. (2008f) Qu’est-ce qu’une espèce animale? Annales de la Société entomologique de France, in press.
Dubois, A. & Günther, R. (1982) Klepton and synklepton: two new evolutionary systematics categories in zoology. Zoologische Jahrbücher: Systematik, 109, 290–305.
Dubois, A. & Ohler, A. (1995) Catalogue of names of frogs of the subgenus Pelophylax (Amphibia, Anura, genus Rana): a few additions and corrections. Zoologica Poloniae, “1994”, 39 (3-4), 205–208.
Dubois, A. & Ohler, A. (1997) Early scientific names of Amphibia Anura. I. Introduction. Bulletin du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, (4), 18 (3-4), 297–320.
Dubois, A. & Ohler, A. (2008) Nomina Amphibiorum. 1. The status of the amphibian nomina created by Merrem (1820) and Ritgen (1828), with comments on the nomenclatural standards of integrative taxonomy. Zootaxa, accepted pending modifications.
Evenhuis, N.L. (2008) The “mihi itch”—a brief history. Zootaxa, 1890, 59–68.
Frost, D.R., Grant, T., Faivovich, J., Bazin, R.H., Haas, A., Haddad, C.F.B., de Sá, R.O., Channing, A., Wilkinson, M., Donnellan, S.C., Raxworthy, C.J., Campbell, J.A., Blotto, B.L., Moler, P., Drewes, R.C., Nussbaum, R.A., Lynch, J. D., Green, D.M. & Wheeler, W.C. (2006) The amphibian tree of life. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 297, 1–370.
Gaffney, E.S. (1979) An introduction to the logic of phylogeny reconstruction. In: Cracraft, J. & Eldredge, N. (Eds.), Phylogenetic analysis and paleontology, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 79–111.
Grant, T., Frost, D.R., Caldwell, J.P., Gagliardo, R., Haddad, C.F.B., Kok, P.J.R., Means, D.B., Noonan, B.P., Schargel, W.E. & Wheeler, W.C. (2006) Phylogenetic Systematics of dart-poison frogs and their relatives (Amphibia: Athesphatanura: Dendrobatidae). Bulletin of the American Museum of natural History, 299, 1–262.
Gray, J. E. (1825) A synopsis of the genera of Reptiles and Amphibia, with a description of some new species. Annals of Philosophy, (2), 10, 193–217.
Haeckel, E. (1866) Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Zweiter Band. Allgemeine Entwickelunggsgeschichte der Organismen. Georg Kramer, Berlin, xlc + 462 pp, 8 pl.
Haffer, J. (1986) Superspecies and species limits in vertebrates. Zeitschrift für zoologische Systematik- und Evolutionsforschung, 24, 169–190.
Hennig, W. (1936) Beziehungen zwischen geographischer Verbreitung und systematischer Gliederung bei einigen Dipterenfamilien: ein Beitrag zum Problem der Gliederung systematischer Kategorien höherer Ordnung. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 116, 161–175.
Hennig, W. (1950) Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik. Deutscher Zentralverlag, Berlin, vii + 370 pp.
Hennig, W. (1966) Phylogenetic systematics. Univ. Illinois Press, Urbana, Chicago & London, vii + 263 pp.
Hillis, D.M. (2006) Constraints in naming parts of the tree of life. Molecular Phylogenetics & Evolution, 42, 331–338.
Hillis, D.M., Chamberlain, D.A., Wilcox, T.P. & Chippindale, P.T. (2001) A new species of subterranean blind salamander (Plethodontidae: Hemidactyliini: Eurycea: Typhlomolge) from Austin, Texas, and a systematic revision of central Texas paedomorphic salamanders. Herpetologica, 57, 266–280.
Hillis, D.M. & Wilcox, T.P. (2005) Phylogeny of the New World true frogs (Rana). Molecular Phylogenetics & Evolution, 34, 299–314.
Joyce, W.G., Parham, J.F. & Gauthier, J.A. (2004) Developing a protocol for the conversion of rank-based taxon names to phylogenetically defined clade names, as exemplified by turtles. Journal of Paleontology, 78, 989–1013.
Keller, R.A., Boyd, R.N. & Wheeler, Q.D. (2003) The illogical basis of phylogenetic nomenclature. The botanical Review, 69, 93–110.
Knox, E., (1998) The use of hierarchies as organizational models in systematics. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 63, 1–49.
Kuhn, O. (1967) Amphibien und Reptilien. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, vii + 124 pp.
Kuntner, M. & Agnarsson, I. (2006) Are the Linnean and phylogenetic nomenclatural systems combinable? Recommendations for biological nomenclature. Systematic Biology, 55, 774–784.
Laurin, M. & Anderson, J.S. (2004) Meaning of the name Tetrapoda in the scientific literature: an exchange. Systematic Biology, 53(1), 68–80.
Martin, J. E. & Benton, M. J. (2008) Crown clades in vertebrate nomenclature: correcting the definition of Crocodylia. Systematic Biology, 57, 173–181.
Mayr, E. (1940) Speciation phenomena in birds. American Naturalist, 74, 249–278.
Mayr, E. (1942) Systematics and the origin of species from the viewpoint of a zoologist. Columbia University Press, New York, xiv + 334 pp.
Mayr, E. (1963) Animal species and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, xiv + 797 pp.
Mayr, E. (1982) The growth of biological thought. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mass. & London, xiii + 974 pp.
Mayr, E. (1995) Systems of ordering data. Biology & Philosophy, 10, 419–434.
Mayr, E. (1997) This is biology. The science of the living world. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mass. & London, xvii + 327 pp.
Mayr, E. & Ashlock, P.D. (1991) Principles of systematic zoology. Second edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, xx + 475 pp.
Minelli, A. (1991) Biological systematics: the state of the art. Chapman & Hall, London, xvi + 387 pp.
Minelli, A. (2000) The ranks and the names of species and higher taxa, or a dangerous inertia of the language of natural history. In: Ghiselin, M. T. & Leviton, A. E. (Eds.), Cultures and institutions of natural history: essays in the history and philosophy of sciences, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, 339–351.
Moore, G. (2003) Should taxon names be explicitly defined? The botanical Review, 69, 2–21.
Muona, J. (2006) To be named or not to be named—Heteropodarke pleijeli sp. n. (Annelida, Polychaeta). Cladistics, 22 (6), 634–635.
Pleijel, F. (1999) Phylogenetic taxonomy, a farewell to species, and a revision of Heteropodarke (Hesionidae, Polychaeta, Annelida). Systematic Biology, 48, 755–789.
Raikow, R.J. (1985) Problems in avian classification. In: Johnston, R. F. (Ed.), Current Ornithology, Vol. 2, Plenum, New York, 187–212.
Risso, A. (1827) Histoire naturelle des principales productions de l’Europe méridionale et particulièrement de celles des environs de Nice et des Alpes Maritimes. Levrault, Paris, xvi + 480 pp.
Samadi, S. & Barberousse, A. (2006) The tree, the network, and the species. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 89, 509–521.
Schaefer, W.W. (1976) The reality of the higher taxonomic categories. Zeitschrift für zoologischer Systematik und Evolutions-Forschung, 14, 1–10.
Sibley, C.G. & Ahlquist, J.E. (1990) Phylogeny and classification of birds. A study in molecular evolution. Yale University Press, New Haven & London, xxiii + 976 pp.
Simpson, G. . (1940) Types in modern taxonomy. American Journal of Science, 238, 413–431.
Strickland, H.E., Henslow, J.S., Phillips, J., Shuckard, W.E., Richardson, J., Waterhouse, G.R., Owen, R., Yarrell, W., Jenyns, L., Darwin, C., Broderip, W.J. & Westwood, J.O. (1843) Series of propositions for rendering the nomenclature of zoology uniform and permanent, being the Report of a Committee for the consideration of the subject appointed by the British Association for the Advancement of Science. Annals & Magazine of natural History, (1), 11, 259–275.
Stuessy, T.F. (2000) Taxon names are not defined. Taxon, 49, 231–233.
Stuessy, T.F. (2001) Taxon names are still not defined. Taxon, 50, 185–186.
Van Valen, L. (1973) Are categories in different phyla comparable? Taxon, 22, 333–373.
Vidal, N. & Hedges, S.B. (2005) The phylogeny of squamate reptiles (lizards, snakes, and amphisbaenians) inferred from nine nuclear protein-coding genes. Comptes rendus Biologies, 328, 1000–1008.
Vieites, D.R., Min, M.-S. & Wake, D. . (2007) Rapid diversification and dispersal during periods of global warming by plethodontid salamanders. Proceedings of the national Academy of Sciences of the USA, 104 (50), 19903–19907.
Wake, D.B., Salvador A. & Alonso-Zarazaga, M.-A. (2005) Taxonomy of the plethodontid salamander genus Hydromantes. Amphibia-Reptilia, 26, 543–548.
Wheeler, Q.D., Raven, P.H. & Wilson, E.O. (2004) Taxonomy: impediment or expedient? Science, 303, 285.
Wiens, J.J. (2007) Review of “The amphibian tree of life”. Quarterly Review of Biology, 82, 55–56.