Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Article
Published: 2008-05-02
Page range: 37–48
Abstract views: 71
PDF downloaded: 47

New species and subspecies descriptions do not and should not always require a dead type specimen

Fundación ProAves, 33 Blenheim Road, Caversham, Reading, RG4 7RT, UK
General Nomenclatural availability vouchers collections type specimen illustrations samples ethics DNA sequences Code Commission

Abstract

Dubois & Nemésio (2007) recently considered that the present International Code for Zoological Nomenclature (“Code”) could reasonably be interpreted as requiring the deposition of dead vouchers for new species and subspecies descriptions. They considered that, to the extent that there is lack of clarity, the Code should be amended so as to require the deposition of a dead voucher. They doubted the utility of photographs and other materials for descriptions and suggested that ethical or moral concerns about the taking of dead type specimens were poorly supported. Dubois & Nemésio (2007)’s preferred interpretations of the current Code are not supported by members of the Commission. Possible reasons why the collection of a dead type specimen might not be necessary or recommended include the setting of a good example to communities in whose hands conservation action lies, government permit issues and the description of new taxa on the brink of extinction where collecting may impact populations. The Code should be liberal in relation to the nature of type specimens to enable taxonomists, who are the persons best placed to take decisions, to make appropriate judgments for particular descriptions.

References

  1. Agar, N. (1995) Valuing species and valuing individuals. Environmental Ethics, 17(4), 397–415.

    American Bird Conservancy (2007) Should the last Ivory-Bills be collected? Bird Calls, 11(2), 3.

    Athreya, R. (2006) A new species of Liocichla (Aves: Timaliidae) from Eaglenest Wildlife Sanctuary, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Indian Birds, 2(4), 82–94.

    Banks, R.C., Goodman, S.M., Lanyon, S. M. & Schulenberg, T.S. (1993) Type specimens and basic principles of avian taxonomy. Auk, 110, 413–414.

    Bekoff, M. & Elzanowski, A. (1997) Collecting birds: the importance of moral debate. Bird Conservation International, 7, 357–361.

    Bennion, F. (2002) Statutory Interpretation, 4th Edition. Butterworths, Oxford.

    Butchart, S.H.M., Stattersfield, A. J. & Collar, N. J. (2006) How many extinctions have we prevented? Oryx, 40(3), 266–278.

    Collar, N.J. (1998) Undiscovered country: the non-collection of the Somali shrike. Bulletin of the African Bird Club, 5, 136–137.

    Collar, N.J. (1999) New species, high standards and the case of Laniarius liberatus. Ibis, 141, 358–367.

    Collar, N.J. (2000) Collecting and conservation: cause and effect. Bird Conservation International, 10, 1–15.

    Cross, R, Bell, J. & Engle, G. (1995) Cross: Statutory Interpretation, 3rd Edition. Butterworths, Oxford.

    Cuervo A.M., Salaman, P.G.W. Donegan, T.M. & Ochoa, J.M. (2001) A new species of piha (Cotingidae: Lipaugus) from the Cordillera Central of Colombia. Ibis, 143(3), 353–368.

    Cuervo, A.M., Cadena, C.D. & Parra, J.L. (2006) Seguir colectando aves en Colombia es imprescindible: un llamado a fortalecer las colecciones ornitológicas. Ornitología Colombiana, 4, 51–58.

    Davenport, T.R.B., Stanley, W.T. Sargis, E.J., De Luca, D.W., Mpunga, N.E., Machaga, S.J. & Olson, L.E. (2006) A New Genus of African Monkey, Rungwecebus: Morphology, Ecology, and Molecular Phylogenetics. Science, 312, 1378–1381.

    Donegan T.M. (2000) Is specimen-taking of birds in the Neotropics really “essential”? Ethical and practical objections to further collection. Neotropical Ornithology, 11, 263–267.

    Donegan, T.M. (2007) A new species of brush finch (Emberizidae: Atlapetes) from the northern Central Andes of Colombia. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club, 127(4), 255–268.

    Donegan, T.M. & Avendaño-C., J.E. (in press) Notes on Tapaculos (Passeriformes: Rhinocryptidae) of the Eastern Cordillera of Colombia and Venezuelan Andes, with description of a new subspecies of Scytalopus griseicollis from Colombia. Ornitología Colombiana, 6.

    Donegan, T.M. & Huertas, B.C. (2006) A new brush-finch in the Atlapetes latinuchus complex from the Yariguíes Mountains and adjacent Eastern Andes of Colombia. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club, 126(2), 94–116.

    Dubois, A. & Nemésio, A. (2007) Does nomenclatural availability of nomina of new species or subspecies require the deposition of vouchers in collections? Zootaxa, 1409, 1–22.

    Eskridge, W., Frickey, P., Garrett, E. (2006) Legislation and Statutory Interpretation, 2nd edition. Foundation Press.

    Fitzpatrick, J.W., Lammertink, L., Luneau, M.D. Jr., Gallagher, T.W., Harrison, B.R., Sparling, G.M., Rosenberg, K.V., Rohrbaugh, R.W., Swarthout, E.C.H., Wrege, P.H., Swarthout, S.B., Dantzker, M.B., Charif, R..A., Barksdale, T.R., Remsen, J.V. Jr., Simon, S.D. & Zollnner, D. (2005) Ivory-billed Woodpecker (Campephlius principalis) persists in continental North America. Science, 308, 1460–1462.

    Fuller, E. (2000) Extinct Birds (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Germain, C.M. (2003) Approaches to statutory interpretation and legislative history in France. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 13, 195–206.

    Griffiths, C.S. & Bates, J.A. (2002) Morphology, genetics and the value of voucher specimens: An example with Cathartes vultures. Journal of Raptor Research, 36, 183–187.

    Hughes, A.L. (1992a) Avian species described on the basis of DNA only. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 2–3.

    Hughes, A.L. (1992b) Reply from Austin Hughes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 168.

    Jones T., Ehardt, C.L., Butynski, T.M., Davenport, T.R.B., Mpunga, N.E., Machaga, S.J. & De Luca, D.W. (2005) The Highland Mangabey Lophocebus kipungi: a new species of African monkey. Science, 308, 1161–1164.

    Le Croy, M. & Vuilleumier, F. (1992) Guidelines for the description of new species in ornithology. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club, 112A, 191–198.

    Lever, C. (1992) On shrikes and shrews. Oryx, 26, 119.

    Loftin R.W. (1992) Scientific Collecting. Environmental Ethics, 14(3), 253–264.

    Mendes Pontes, A.R., Malta, A. & Asfora, P.H. (2006) A new species of capuchin monkey, genus Cebus Erxleben (Cebidae, Primates): found at the very brink of extinction in the Pernambuco Endemism Centre. Zootaxa, 1200, 1–12.

    Munsell Color (1977) Munsell® color charts for plant tissues. GretagMacbeth LLC, New York.

    Munsell Color (2000) Munsell® soil color charts. GretagMacbeth LLC, New York.

    Patterson, B.D. (2002) On the continuing need for scientific collecting of mammals. Journal of Neotropical Mammalogy, 9, 253–262.

    Peterson, A. T. & Lanyon, S. M. (1992) New bird species, DNA studies and type specimens. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 167–168.

    Peterson, A.T., Navarro-Siguenza, A.G. & Benitez-Diaz, H. (1998) The need for continued scientific collecting: A geographical analysis of Mexican bird specimens. Ibis, 140, 288–294.

    Polaszek, A., Grubb, P., Groves, C., Ehardt, C.L. & Butynski, T.M. (2005) What constitutes a proper description: response. Science, 309, 2164–2166.

    Pyle, R.L., Earle, J.L. & Greene, B.D. (2008) Five new species of the damselfish genus Chromis (Perciformes: Labroidei: Pomacentridae) from deep coral reefs in the tropical western Pacific. Zootaxa, 1671, 3–31.

    Remsen J.V. Jr. (1995) The importance of continued collecting of bird specimens to ornithology and bird conservation. Bird Conservation International, 5, 145–180.

    Remsen J.V. Jr. (1997) Museum specimens: Science, conservation and morality. Bird Conservation International, 7, 363–366.

    Remsen, J. V. Jr., Cadena, C.D., Jaramillo, A., Nores, M., Pacheco, J. F., Robbins, M. B., Schulenberg, T. S., Stiles F. G., Stotz, D. F. & Zimmer, K. J. (2008) A classification of the bird species of South America (version 3 April 2008). www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCBaseline.html. Comments on rejected Proposals 219 and 277.

    Rojas-Soto, O.R., de Aquino-López, S., Sánchez-González, L.A. & Hernández-Banos, B.E. (2002) La colecta científica en el Neotrópico: El caso de las aves de México. Neotropical Ornithology, 13, 209–214.

    Salaman, P., Coopmans, P., Donegan, T.M., Mulligan, M., Cortés, A., Hilty, S.L. & Ortega, L.A. (2003) A new species of Wood-Wren (Troglodytidae: Henicorhina) from the western Andes of Colombia. Ornitología Colombiana, 1, 4–21.

    Smith, E.F.G., Arctander, P., Fjeldså, J. & Amir, O.G. (1991) A new species of shrike (Laniidae: Laniarius) from Somalia, verified by DNA sequence data from the only known individual. Ibis, 133, 227–235.

    Stiles, F.G. (1983) On sightings and specimens. Auk, 100, 225–226.

    Thalman, U. & Geissmann, T. (2005) New species of woolly lemur Avahi (Primates: Lemuriformes) in Bernaraha (central western Madagascar). American Journal of Primatology, 67, 371–376.

    Timm, R.M., Ramey R.R. II & Nomenclatural Committee of the American Society of Mammalogists (2005) What constitutes a proper description? Science, 309, 2163–2164.

    Vuilleumier, F. (1998) The need to collect birds in the Neotropics. Neotropical Ornithology, 9, 201–203.

    Vuilleumier, F. (2000) Response: further collection of birds in the Neotropics is still needed. Neotropical Ornithology, 11, 269–274.

    Wakeham-Dawson, A., Morris, S., Tubbs, P., Dalebout, M.L. & Baker, C.S. (2002) Type specimens: dead or alive? Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 59(4), 282–286.

    Winker, K., Fall, B.A., Klicka, J.T., Parmelee, D.F. & Tordoff, H.B. (1991) The importance of avian collections and the need for continued collecting. Loon, 63, 238–246.

    Winker, K., Braun, M.J. & Graves, G.R. (1996) Voucher specimens and quality control in avian molecular studies. Ibis, 138, 345–346.