Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Article
Published: 2008-01-31
Page range: 1–37
Abstract views: 35
PDF downloaded: 1

Vosmaeria Fristedt, 1885 (Porifera, Demospongiae, Halichondriidae): revision of species, phylogenetic reconstruction and evidence for split

Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology & Soil Sciences, St. Petersburg State University, 7/9 Universitetskaya Embankment, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia
##plugins.generic.jatsParser.article.authorBio##
×

DIRK ERPENBECK

Department of Geobiology, Geoscience Centre Göttingen, Goldschmidtstr. 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
Department of Ichthyology & Hydrobiology, Faculty of Biology & Soil Sciences, St. Petersburg State University, 29, the 16th line of Vasilijevsky Island, 199178 St. Petersburg, Russia
Porifera Taxonomy molecular phylogeny Halichondriidae Vosmaeria Johannesia gen. nov.

Abstract

All species of Vosmaeria are re-described using type and additional material. The phylogenetic relationships between Vosmaeria ssp. and other demosponge taxa are reconstructed based on 28S-rDNA sequences analyses. V. crustacea, the type species, is widely distributed in the NE Atlantic and characterized by a thinly encrusting growth form, the location of ostia and oscula exclusively on papillae, a dense and firm ectosomal skeleton, the absence of subectosomal aquiferous cavities and the blunt distal tips of tylostyles. Hydrochemical conditions may account for the smaller spicule size of the White Sea population compared to those in the North and Barents Sea. V. reticulosa, known from the Chilean and Peruvian coasts, is distinguished by a massive growth form, a reticulated ectosomal skeleton, the absence of papillae, the scattering of ostia and oscula over the surface, the presence of subectosomal cavities and the acerate distal tips of tylostyles. V. levigata, known exclusively from the English Channel, shares the absence of papillae and the acerate distal tips of tylostyles with V. reticulosa, but the only surviving material consists of dissociated spicules slides, and consequently its status remains unclear. On the basis of substantial morphological differences we propose to split Vosmaeria into two monospecific genera – Vosmaeria, with type species V. crustacea, and Johannesia gen. nov., with type species V. reticulosa. Both genera clearly belong to Halichondriidae based on the tangential arrangement of the ectosomal skeleton, the presence of oxeas. Molecular phylogenetic analyses support a split into two genera and confirm the classification of both within the Halichondriidae.

References

  1. Alander, H. (1942) Sponges from the Swedish west-coast and adjacent waters–Ph.D. Thesis. University of Lund, H. Struves, Goeteborg, 95 pp.

    Alvarez, B. & Hooper, J.N.A. (2002) Family Axinellidae Carter, 1875. In: Hooper, J.N.A. & van Soest, R.W.M. (Eds), Systema Porifera. A Guide to the Classification of Sponges. Vol. 1, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp. 724–747.

    Arndt, W. (1935) Porifera. In: Die Tierwelt der Nord- und Ostsee. 3a (27), Leipzig, pp. 1–140.

    Babkov, A.I. & Golikov, A.N. (1984) Hydrobiocomplexes of the White Sea. Edition of the Zoological Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Leningrad, 104 pp. [In Russian].

    Borojevic, R., Cabioch, L. & Lévi, C. (1968) Inventaire de la faune marine de Roscoff. Spongiaires. Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 9(1), 1–44.

    Boury-Esnault, N. (2002) Family Polymastiidae Gray, 1867. In: Hooper, J.N.A. & van Soest, R.W.M. (Eds), Systema Porifera. A Guide to the Classification of Sponges. Vol. 1, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp. 201-219.

    Breitfuss, L.L. (1911) Zur Kenntnis der Spongio-Fauna des Kola-Fjords. T. 1. Travaux de la Société Imperiale des Naturalistes de St.-Pétersbourg, XLII, 1(4), 209–221. [In Russian with German summary].

    Burton, M. (1930) Norwegian Sponges from the Norman Collection. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1930(2), 487–546.

    Burton, M. (1932) Sponges. Discovery Reports, 6, 237–392.

    Chombard, C. & Boury-Esnault, N. (1999) Good congruence between morphology and molecular phylogeny of Hadromerida, or how to bother sponge taxonomists. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 44, 100.

    Dohrmann M., Voigt O., Erpenbeck D. & Wörheide G. (2006) Non-monophyly of most supraspecific taxa of calcareous sponges (Porifera, Calcarea) revealed by increased taxon sampling and partitioned Bayesian analysis of ribosomal DNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 40(3), 830–843.

    Erpenbeck, D., Duran, S., Rützler, K., Paul, V., Hooper, J.N.A. & Wörheide, G. (in press) Towards a DNA taxonomy of Caribbean demosponges: a gene tree reconstructed from partial mitochondrial CO1 gene sequences supports previous rDNA phylogenies and provides a new perspective on the systematics of Demospongiae. Journal of the Marine Biological Society of the United Kingdom.

    Erpenbeck, D., Hooper, J.N.A., List-Armitage, S.E., Degnan, B.M., Wörheide, G. & van Soest, R.W.M. (2007a) Affinities of the family Sollasellidae (Porifera, Demospongiae). II. Molecular evidence. Contributions to Zoology, 76(2), 95–102.

    Erpenbeck, D., McCormack, G.P., Breeuwer, J.A.J. & van Soest, R.W.M. (2004) Order level differences in the structure of partial LSU across demosponges (Porifera): new insights into an old taxon. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 32, 388–395.

    Erpenbeck, D., Nichols S.A., Voigt O., Dohrmann M., Degnan B.M., Hooper J.N.A. & Wörheide G. (2007b) Phylogenetic analyses under secondary structure-specific substitution models outperform traditional approaches – case studies with diploblast LSU. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 64, 543–557.

    Erpenbeck, D. & van Soest, R.W.M. (2002) Family Halichondriidae Gray, 1867. In: Hooper, J.N.A. & van Soest, R.W.M. (Eds), Systema Porifera. A Guide to the Classification of Sponges. Vol. 1, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp. 787–815.

    Fristedt, K. (1885) Bidrag till Kännedomen om de vid Sveriges vestra Kust lefvande Spongiae. Kungliga Svenska vetenskapsakademiens handlingar, 21, 1–56.

    Hooper, J.N.A. & van Soest, R.W.M. (eds.), (2002). Systema Porifera, A guide to the classification of sponges. New York: KluwerAcademic/Plenum Publishers, xlviii + 1708 pp.

    Kishino, H. & Hasegawa, M. (1989) Evaluation of the Maximum-Likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA-sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 29, 170–179.

    Koltun, V.M. (1966) Four-rayed sponges of Northern and Far Eastern seas of the USSR (order Tetraxonida). Identifiers of the USSR fauna issued by the Zoological Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Vol. 90, Nauka edition, Moscow–Leningrad, pp. 1–112. [In Russian].

    Lendenfeld, R. von (1885) A Monograph of the Australian Sponges. III. The Calcispongiae. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 9, 1083–1150.

    Levinsen, G.M.R. (1893). V. Ascidiae simplices. Annulata, Hydroidæ, Anthozoa, Porifera. In: Petersen, C.G.J. (Ed), Det videnskabelige udbytte af Kanonbaaden ‘Hauchs’ togter i de danske have indenfor Skagen i aarene 1883–86. Copenhagen, pp. 321–425.

    Maddison, W.P. & Maddison, D.R. (1992) MacClade: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    McCormack, G.P., Erpenbeck, D. & van Soest, R.W.M. (2002) Major discrepancy between phylogenetic hypotheses based on molecular and morphological criteria within the Order Haplosclerida (Phylum Porifera: Class Demospongiae). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 40, 237–240.

    Nichols, S.A. (2005) An evaluation of support for order-level monophyly and interrelationships within the class Demospongiae using partial data from the large subunit rDNA and cytochrome oxidase subunit I. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 34, 81–96.

    Nylander, J. (2005) MrModeltest. Uppsala University, Department of Systematic Zoology. Available from http://www.ebc.uu.se/systzoo/staff/nylander.html (accessed 12.11.2006).

    Rezvoj, P.P. (1928) Contributions to the fauna of Porifera in the Barents Sea. Proceedings of the Institute of the North research, 37, 67–94. [In Russian with English summary].

    Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics, 19, 1572–1574.

    Schmdit, O. (1875) Spongien. In: Die Expedition zur physikalisch-chemischen und biologischen Untersuchung der Nordsee im Sommer 1872. Jahresbericht der Commission zur Wissenschaftlichen Untersuchung der Deutschen Meere in Kiel, Vol. 2–3, pp. 115–120.

    Shimodaira, H. & Hasegawa, M. (1999) Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 16, 1114–1116.

    Swarczewsky, B.A. (1906) Beiträge zur Spongien-Fauna des Weissen Meeres. Memoires de la Société des Naturalistes de Kiew, 20(2), 307–371. [In Russian with German summary].

    Swofford, D.L. (2002) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods) Version 4.0 Beta. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    Thiele, J. (1905) Die Kiesel- und Hornschwämme der Sammlung Plate. Zoologische Jahrbücher Supplement 6 (Fauna Chiliensis III), 407–496.

    Topsent, E. (1896). Matériaux pour servir a l’étude de la faune des spongiaires de France. Mémoires de la Société zoologique de France, 9, 113–133.

    Van Soest, R.W.M. (2002) Family Suberitidae Schmidt, 1870. In: Hooper, J.N.A. & van Soest, R.W.M. (Eds), Systema Porifera. A Guide to the Classification of Sponges. Vol. 1, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp. 227–244.

    Vosmaer, G.C.J. (1885) The Sponges of the ‘Willem Barents’ Expedition 1880 and 1881. Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde, 12(3), 1–47.