Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Articles
Published: 2007-07-19
Page range: 61–68
Abstract views: 40
PDF downloaded: 1

Description of the tadpole of Leptodactylus vastus (Anura: Leptodactylidae)

Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Biológicas (Área de concentração em zoologia) e Coleção Herpetológica do Departamento de Sistemática e Ecologia, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Campus I, João Pessoa, PB, Brasil. 58059-900.
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Biológicas (Área de concentração em zoologia) e Coleção Herpetológica do Departamento de Sistemática e Ecologia, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Campus I, João Pessoa, PB, Brasil. 58059-900.
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Biológicas (Área de concentração em zoologia) e Coleção Herpetológica do Departamento de Sistemática e Ecologia, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Campus I, João Pessoa, PB, Brasil. 58059-900.
Anura Description tadpole Leptodactylus vastus Atlantic Rain Forest northeastern Brazil

Abstract

The Neotropical frog Leptodactylus vastus belongs to the L. pentadactylus group, a group that currently contains 14 species, and of which nine tadpoles have been described. The tadpoles of L. vastus described here are generally much smaller than tadpoles of the other species described. The oral disk of L. vastus tadpoles is almost anteriorly placed, similar to other tadpoles in the group except for L. lithonaetes and L. rugosus, and the rows of marginal papillae in L. vastus are different from those in the other species. The tadpoles of L. vastus have a 1/2(1) LTRF similar to that of L. labyrinthicus and amazonian L. pentadactylus, whereas other species in the group show different arrangements of the tooth rows. The internal oral characteristics of the tadpole of L. vastus differs from L. knudseni and L. pentadactylus by having four infralabial papillae, possess 4–5 prepocket papillae surrounded by postulations and the buccal roof arena is circular, surrounded by two long papillae and 4–6 smaller papillae. The tadpoles of L. vastus, in general, possess a set of morphological characteristics that are very similar to those of other species of the L. pentadactylus group, and some of them are probably related to tadpole ecology.

References

  1. Agostinho, C.A., Foresti, F.S., Lima, L. & Jim, J. (2002) Reproduction and population size of Leptodactylus labyrinthicus (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae). Russian Journal of Herpetology, 9, 15–20.

    Altig, R. (1970) A key to the tadpoles of the continental United States and Canada. Herpetologica, 26, 180–207.

    Altig, R. & Johnston, G.F. (1986) Major characteristics of free-living anuran tadpole. Smithsonian Herpetological Information Service, 67, 1–75.

    Altig, R. & Johnston, G.F. (1989) Guilds of anurans larvae: relationships among developmental modes, morphologies, and habitats. Herpetological Monographs, 3, 81–109.

    Altig, R. & McDiarmid, R.W. (1999) Body Plan: Development and Morphology. In: McDiarmid, R.W. & Altig, R. (Eds.), Tadpoles. The biology of anuran larvae. University of Chicago and London, pp. 24–51.

    Cannatella, D. (1999) Architecture cranial and axial musculoskeleton. In: McDiarmid, R.W. & Altig, R. (Eds.), Tadpoles. The biology of anuran larvae. University of Chicago and London, pp. 54–91.

    Eterovick, P.C. & Sazima, I. (2000) Description of the tadpole of Leptodactylus syphax, with a comparison of morphological and ecological characters of tadpoles and adults of the species in the L. pentadactylus group (Leptodactylidae, Anura). Amphibia-Reptilia, 21, 341–350.

    Gosner, K.L. (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica, 16, 183–190.

    Haas, A. (2003) Phylogeny of frogs as inferred from primarily larval characters (Amphibia: Anura). Cladistics, 19, 23–89.

    Hero, J,M. (1990) An illustrated key to tadpoles occurring in the Central Amazon rainforest, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. Amazoniana, 11, 201–262.

    Hero, J. & Galatti, U. (1990) Characteristics distinguishing Leptodactylus pentadactylus and L. knudseni in the Central Amazon rainforest. Journal of Herpetology, 24, 227–228.

    Heyer, W.R. (1970) Studies on frogs of the genus Leptodactylus (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae). II. Diagnosis and distribution of the Leptodactylus of the Costa Rica. Revista de Biología Tropical, 16, 171–205.

    Heyer, W.R. (1979) Systematics of Pentadactylus species group of the frog genus Leptodactylus (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae). Smithsonian Institution Press, 301, 1–43.

    Heyer, W.R. (1995) South American rocky habitat Leptodactylus (Amphibia: Anura: Leptodactylidae) with description of two new species. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 108, 695–716.

    Heyer, W.R. (2005) Variation and taxonomic clarification of the large species of the Leptodactylus pentadactylus species group (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae) from Middle America, northern South America, and Amazonia. Arquivos de Zoologia, 37, 269–348.

    Heyer, W.R. & Thompson, A.S. (2000) Leptodactylus rugosus. Catalogue of American Amphibian and Reptile, 708, 1–5.

    Muedeking, M.H. & Heyer, W.R. (1976) Descriptions of eggs and reproductive patterns of Leptodactylus pentadactylus (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae). Herpetologica, 32, 137–139.

    Savage, J.M. (2002) The amphibians and reptiles of Costa Rica: a herpetofauna between two continents, between two seas. The University of Chicago Press. 934 pp.

    Shepard, D.B. & Caldwell, J. P. (2005) From foam to free-living: ecology of larval Leptodactylus labyrinthicus. Copeia, 4, 803–811.

    Vizotto, L.D. (1967) Desenvolvimento de anuros na região norte-ocidental do Estado de São Paulo. PhD Thesis. Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.

    Wassersug, R.J. (1976) Oral morphology of anuran larvae: terminology and general description. Occasional papers of the Museum of Natural History University of Kansas, 48, 1–23.

    Wassersug, R.J. & Heyer, W.R. (1988) A survey of internal oral features of Leptodactyloid larvae (Amphibia: Anura). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 457, 1–99.