Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Articles
Published: 2007-03-08
Page range: 59–68
Abstract views: 30
PDF downloaded: 1

The auditory region of Brachycephalus and its bearing on the monophyly of the genus (Anura: Brachycephalidae)

Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Caixa Postal 74524, Cep 23.851-970, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Pós-graduação em Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia – Universidade de Brasília –UnB 70910-900 - Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Laboratório de Anatomia Comparativa de Vertebrados, Departamento de Ciências Fisiológicas, CFS-IB – UnB 70910-900 - Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Anura digit reduction middle ear miniaturization ostia pharyngea tympanic annulus stapes systematics

Abstract

We surveyed the morphology of the auditory region of members of the anuran genus Brachycephalus. The sample included seven of the eleven known species; in addition, Brachycephalus ephippium and B. vertebralis were each represented by several specimens from different localities. All species lack a tympanum, tympanic annulus, stapes, and Eustachian tube. However, the operculum and the m. opercularis remain. The large operculum bears a robust process for the m. opercularis and covers most of the fenestra ovalis. The auditory apparatus of Brachycephalus is distinguished by the large size and the orientation of the fenestra ovalis, which faces posterior, rather than lateral. The morphology of these structures is compared to those of other minute brachycephalid frogs considered to be close relatives of Brachycephalus, and the importance of these characters as evidence of the monophyly of the genus is discussed. We also discuss the importance of other morphological features cited to support close relationships among small-sized brachycephalids, and consider the role of miniaturization in generating convergent pattern of loss of morphological features.

References

  1. Alberch P. & Gale, E.A. (1985) A developmental analysis of an evolutionary trend: digital reduction in amphibians. Evolution, 39(1), 8–23.

    Alberch P., Gould, S.J., Oster, G.F. & Wake, D.B. (1979) Size and Shape in Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Paleobiology, 5(3), 296–317.

    Alberch P. (1980) Ontogenesis and Morphological diversification. American Zoologist, 20, 653–667.

    Alberch, P. (1981) Convergence and parallelism in foot morphology in the neotropical salamander genus Bolitoglossa. Evolution, 35(1), 84–100.

    Alves, A.C.R., Ribeiro, L.F., Haddad, C.F.B., & Reis S.F. (2006) Two New Species of Brachycephalus (Anura: Brachycephalidae) from the Atlantic Forest in Paraná State, Southern Brazil. Herpetologica, 62(2), 221–233.

    Ananias, F., Giaretta, A.A., & Recco-Pimentel, S.M. (2006) Cytogenetics of Brachycephalus ephippium (Anura, Brachycephalidae) with comments on its relationship to the Bufonidae. Amphibia-Reptilia, 27(1), 121–125.

    Cannatella, D.C. & Trueb, L. (1988) Evolution of pipoid frogs: morphology and phylogenetic relationships of Pseudohymenochirus. Journal of Herpetology, 22(4), 439–456.

    da Silva, H.R. & Meinhardt DJ. (1999) The generic status of Adelophryne tridactyla: osteology, synonymy, and comments on the genus Syncope (Anura: Microhylidae). Journal of Herpetology, 33(1), 159–164.

    Darst, C.R. & Cannatella, D.C. (2004) Novel relationships among hyloid frogs inferred from 12S and 16S mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 31(3), 462–475.

    Duellman W.E. & Trueb, L. (1986) Biology of Amphibians. Mcgraw-Hill, New York 670 pp.

    Estrada, A.R. & Hedges, S.B. (1996) At the lower size limit in tetrapods: a new diminutive frog from Cuba (Leptodactylidae: Eleutherodactylus). Copeia, (4), 852–859.

    Ford L. S. & Cannatella, D. C. (1993) The major clades of frogs. Herpetological Monographs, (7), 94–117.

    Frost, D.R., Grant, T., Faivovich, J., Bain, R.H., Haas, A., Haddad, C.F.B., de Sa, R.O., Channing, A., Wilkinson, M., Donnellan, S.C., Raxworthy, C.J., Campbell, J.A., Blotto, B.L., Moler, P., Drewes, R.C., Nussbaum, R.A., Lynch, J.D., Green, D.M., & Wheeler, W.C. (2006). The amphibian tree of life. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 297, 1–370.

    Giaretta, A.A. & Sawaya, R.J. (1998) Second Species of Psyllophryne (Anura: Brachycephalidae). Copeia, (4), 985–987.

    Graybeal, A. & Cannatella, D.C. (1995) A new taxon of Bufonidae from Peru, with descriptions of two new species and a review of the phylogenetic status of supraspecific Bufonid Taxa. Herpetologica, 5(2), 105–131.

    Griffiths, I. (1963) The phylogeny of the Salientia. Biological Reviews, 38, 241–292.

    Hanken, J. & Wake, D.B. (1993) Miniaturization of Body Size: Organismal Consequences and Evolutionary Significance. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 24, 467–500.

    Hetherington, T.E., Jaslow, A.P., & Lombard, R.E. (1986) Comparative morphology of the amphibian opercularis system: I. General design features and functional interpretation. Journal of Morphology, 190(1), 43–61.

    Hoogmoed, M.S., Borges, D.M., & Cascon, P. (1994) Three new species of the genus Adelophryne (Amphibia: Anura: Leptodactylidae) from northeastern Brazil, with remarks on the other species of the genus. Zoologische Medelingen, Leiden 68, 271–300.

    Hoogmoed, M.S. & Lescure, J. (1984) A new genus and two new species of minute leptodactylid frogs from northeen South America, with comments upon Phyzelaphryne (Amphibia: Anura: Leptodactylidae). Zoologische Mededelingen, 58(6), 85–115.

    Izecksohn, E. (1971) Novo gênero e nova espécie de Brachycephalidae do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil (Amphibia, Anura). Boletim do Museu Nacional do Rio de Janeiro, 280, 1–12.

    Izecksohn, E. (1988) Algumas considerações sobre o gênero Euparkerella, com a descrição de três novas espécies (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 48(1), 59–74.

    Lombard R. E. & Straughan, I. R. (1974) Functional aspects of anuran middle ear structures. Journal of Experimental Biology, 61, 71–93.

    Lynch, J.D. (1971) Evolutionary relationships, osteology, and zoogeography of leptodactyloid frogs. Miscelaneous Publications, Museum of Natural History, The University of Kansas, (53), 1–238.

    MacDiarmid, R.W. (1971) Comparative morphology and evolution of the frogs of the Neotropical genera Atelopus, Dendrophrynuscus, Melanophryniscus, and Oreophrynela. Bulletin of the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, (12). 1–66.

    McLachlan, P. (1943) The Cranial and Visceral Osteology of the Neotropical Anuran Brachycephalus ephippium Spix. South African Journal of Science, 49, 164–195.

    Noble, G.K. (1931) The Biology of amphibia. McGraw-Hill. New York, 577 pp.

    Pombal Jr., J.P., Sazima I, & Haddad, C.F.B. (1994) Breeding Behavior of the Pumpkin Toadlet, Brachycephalus ephippium (Brachycephalidae). Journal of Herpetology, 28(4), 516–519.

    Pombal Jr., J.P. & Gasparini, J.L. (2006) A New Brachycephalus (Anura: Brachycephalidae) from the Atlantic Rainfor est of Espírito Santo, Southeastern Brazil. South American Journal of Herpetology, 1(2), 87–93.

    Pombal Jr., S.P., Wistuba, E.M., & Bornschein, M.R. (1998) A new species of Brachycephalidae (Anura) from the Atlantic Rain Forest of Brazil. Journal of Herpetology, 32(1), 70–74.

    Ribeiro, L.F., Alves, A.C.R., Haddad, C.F.B., & Reis, S.F. (2005) Two new Species of Brachycephalus Günther, 1858 from the State of Paraná, Southern Brazil (Amphibia, Anura, Brachycephalidae). Boletim do Museu Nacional, (518), 1–18.

    Roth, G., Dicke, U., & Nishikawa, K. (1992) How do Ontogeny, Morphology, and Physiology of Sensory Systems Constrain and Direct the Evolution of Amphibians? The American Naturalist, (139), 105–124.

    Trueb, L. & Alberch, P. (1985) Miniaturization and the anuran skull: a case study of heterochrony. In H. R. Duncker and G. Fleischer, (Eds). Functional Morphology of the Vertebrates. Gustav Fischer Verlag, New York, 113–121.

    Vorobyeva, E. & Smirnov, S. (1987). Characteristic features in the formation of anuran sound-conducting systems. Journal of Morphology¸ 192(1), 1–11.

    Yeh, J. (2002) The effect of miniaturized body size on skeletal morphology in frogs. Evolution, 56(3), 628–641.