Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Articles
Published: 2007-02-19
Page range: 1–22
Abstract views: 191
PDF downloaded: 1

Does nomenclatural availability of nomina of new species or subspecies require the deposition of vouchers in collections?

Vertébrés: Reptiles & Amphibiens, USM 0602 Taxonomie & Collections, Département de Systématique & Evolution, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, CP 30, 25 rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris, France.
Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Caixa Postal 486, Belo Horizonte, MG. 30.123-970, Brazil.
Biodiversity crisis — Nomenclatural availability — Vouchers — Onomatophores — Collections — Illustrations — DNA sequences — Definitions — Code — Commission

Abstract

Several species of birds and primates recently described opened a debate in the zoological community on the possibility of naming new species or subspecies without material onomatophores (“name-bearing types”) deposited in collections. The current writing of the Code is ambiguous in this respect. We support here the view that such practice is not doing a service to the discipline of taxonomy as illustrations, DNA sequences or “definitions” cannot replace voucher specimens. The latter are and will be badly needed for the proper knowledge of the vanishing biodiversity of our planet. We review arguments pro and con the need to have a Rule in the Code requiring the deposition of onomatophores in collections for the proper and valid creation of new nomina in zoological nomenclature. In conclusion, we propose a more drastic Rule in this respect but also the possibility, in some exceptional cases, to apply to the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature to make nomina available even in the absence of material onomatophores.

References

  1. Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1985) International code of zoological nomenclature. Third edition. International Trust for zoological Nomenclature, London, 358 pp.

    Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1999) International code of zoological nomenclature. Fourth edition. International Trust for zoological Nomenclature, London, 335 pp.

    Arnold, E.N. (1979) Indian Ocean giant tortoises: their systematics and island adaptations. Philosophical Transactions of the royal Society of London, (B, Biological Sciences), 286, 127–145.

    Austin, J.J., Arnold, E. N. & Bour, R. (2002) The provenance of type specimens of extinct Mascarene Island giant tortoises (Cylindraspis) revealed by ancient mitochondrial DNA sequences. Journal of Herpetology, 36, 280–285.

    Bellatreche, M. (1991) Deux nouvelles localisations de la Sitelle kabyle Sitta ledanti en Algérie. L’Oiseau & la Revue française d’Ornithologie, 61, 269–272.

    Böhme, W. & Ziegler, T. (1997) Varanus melinus sp. n., ein neuer Waran aus der V. indicus-Gruppe von den Molukken, Indonesien. Herpetofauna, 19, 26–34.

    Bour, R. (1978) Les tortues des Mascareignes: description d’une espèce nouvelle d’après un document (Mémoires de l’Académie) de 1737 dans lequel le crâne est figuré. Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris, 287, 491–493, pl. I.

    Bour, R. (1979) Première découverte de restes osseux de la tortue terrestre de la Réunion, Cylindraspis borbonica. Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris, 288, 1223–1226, pl. I.

    Bour, R. (1984) Les tortues terrestres géantes des îles de l’océan Indien occidental: données géographiques, taxinomiques et phylogénétiques. Studia geologica salmanticensia, Volumen especial 1, Studia palaeocheloniologica I, 17–76.

    Bousfield, E.L. & Leblond, P.H. (1995) An account of Cadborosaurus willsi, new genus, new species, a large aquatic reptile from the Pacific coast of North America. Amphipacifica, 1 (suppl. 1), 3–25.

    Bruun, A.F. (1950) The Systema Naturae of the twentieth century. Science, 112, 342–343.

    Dalebout, M.L. & Baker, C.S. (2002) Type specimens: dead or alive? Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 59, 284–286.

    Dalebout, M.L., Baker, C.S., Mead, J.G., Cockcroft, V.G. & Yamada, T.K. (2004) A comprehensive and validated molecular taxonomy of beaked whales, family Ziphiidae. Journal of Heredity, 95, 459–473.

    Davenport, T.R.B., Stanley, W.T., Sargis, E.J., De Luca, D.W., Mpunga, N.E., Machaga, S.J. & Olson, L.E. (2006) A new genus of African monkey, Rungwecebus: morphology, ecology, and molecular phylogenetics. Science, 312, 1378– 1381.

    De Queiroz, K. & Gauthier, J. (1990) Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: phylogenetic definitions of taxon names. Systematic Zoology, 39, 307–322.

    De Queiroz, K. & Gauthier, J. (1994) Toward a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 9, 27–31.

    Doumandji, S. & Kisserli, O. (1993) Paramètres écologiques de la Sittelle [sic] kabyle Sitta ledanti, en chênaie mixte dans le Parc National de Taza (Algérie). Alauda, 61, 264–265.

    Dubois, A. (1984) Sample-size constraints in the use of nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test for the comparison of two independent samples: consequences in Anuran Amphibians systematics. Alytes, 3, 20–24.

    Dubois, A. (2000) Synonymies and related lists in zoology: general proposals, with examples in herpetology. Dumerilia, 4, 33–98.

    Dubois, A. (2003) The relationships between taxonomy and conservation biology in the century of extinctions. Comptes rendus Biologies, 326 (suppl. 1), S9–S21.

    Dubois, A. (2005) Proposed Rules for the incorporation of nomina of higher-ranked zoological taxa in the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 1. Some general questions, concepts and terms of biological nomenclature. Zoosystema, 27, 365–426.

    Dubois, A. (2006a) Proposed Rules for the incorporation of nomina of higher-ranked zoological taxa in the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 2. The proposed Rules and their rationale. Zoosystema, 28, 165–258.

    Dubois, A. (2006b) Incorporation of nomina of higher-ranked taxa into the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature: some basic questions. Zootaxa, 1337, 1–37.

    Dubois, A. (2006c) Species introductions and reintroductions, faunistic and genetic pollution: some provocative thoughts. Alytes, 24, 147–164.

    Dubois, A. (submitted-a) Phylogeny, taxonomy and nomenclature: the problem of taxonomic categories and of nomenclatural ranks.

    Dubois, A. (submitted-b) A partial but radical solution to the problem of nomenclatural taxonomic inflation.

    Dubois, A. & Ohler, A. (1995) Frogs of the subgenus Pelophylax (Amphibia, Anura, genus Rana): a catalogue of available and valid scientific names, with comments on name-bearing types, complete synonymies, proposed common names, and maps showing all type localities. Zoologica polonica, “1994”, 39, 139–204.

    Dubois, A. & Ohler, A. (1997a) Early scientific names of Amphibia Anura. I. Introduction. Bulletin du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, (4), 18, 297–320.

    Dubois, A. & Ohler, A. (1997b) Early scientific names of Amphibia Anura. II. An exemplary case: Rana arborea Linnaeus, 1758. Bulletin du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, (4), 18, 321–340.

    Elias, P. (1984) Salamanders of the northwestern highlands of Guatemala. Contributions in Science, Natural History Museum of the Los Angeles County, 348, 1–20.

    Funk, V.A., Hoch, P.C., Prather, L.A. & Wagner, W.L. (2005) The importance of vouchers. Taxon, 54, 127–129.

    Goodman, S.M. & Lanyon, S.M. (1994) Scientific collecting. Conservation Biology, 8, 314–315.

    Heuvelmans, B. (1969) Note préliminaire sur un spécimen conservé dans la glace, d’une forme encore inconnue d’Hominidé vivant: Homo pongoides (sp. seu subsp. nov.). Bulletin de l’Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique 45, 1–24.

    Heuvelmans, B. & Porchnev, B.F. (1974). L’homme de Néanderthal est toujours vivant. Plon, Paris, 554 pp.

    Holland, N.D., Clague, D.A., Gordon, D.P., Gebruk, Pawson, D.L. & Vecchione, M. (2005) “Lophenteropneust” hypothesis refuted by collection and photos of new deep-sea hemichordates. Nature, 434, 374–376.

    Ineich, I. (2006) Le scinque terrifiant de Bocourt existe toujours! Le Caillou vert, 5, 8.

    Jones, T., Ehardt, C.L., Butynski, T.M., Davenport, T.R.B., Mpunga, N.E., Machaga, S.J. & De Luca, D.W. (2005) The highland mangabey Lophocebus kipunji: a new species of African monkey. Science, 308, 1161–1164.

    Joyce, W.G., Parham, J.F. & Gauthier, J.A. (2004) Developing a protocol for the conversion of rank-based taxon names to phylogenetically defined clade names, as exemplified by turtles. Journal of Paleontology, 78, 989–1013.

    Kottelat, M. & Lim, K.K.P. (1993) A review of the eel-loaches of the genus Pangio (Teleostei: Cobitidae) from the Malay Peninsula, with description of six new species. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, 41, 203–249.

    Kottelat, M. & Persat, H. (2005) The genus Gobio in France, with redescription of G. goboi and description of two new species (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Cybium, 29, 211–234.

    Kuntner, M. & Agnarsson, I. (2006) Are the Linnean and phylogenetic nomenclatural systems combinable? Recommendations for biological nomenclature. Systematic Biology, 55, 774–784.

    Landry, S.O. (2005) What constitutes a proper description? Science, 309, 2164.

    Lemche, H., Hansen, B., Madsen, F.J., tendal, O.S. & Wolff, T. (1976) Hadal life as analyzed from photographs. Videnskabellge Meddelelser fra dansk naturhistorisk Forening, 139, 262–336.

    Lescure, J., Renous, S. & Gasc, J.-P. (1986) Proposition d’une nouvelle classification des Amphibiens Gymnophiones. Mémoires de la Société zoologique de France, 43, 145–177, 1 tab.

    Mayr, E. (1997) This is biology. The science of the living world. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mass. & London, 344 pp.


    McCabe, H. & Wright, J. (2000) Tangled tale of a lost, stolen and disputed coelacanth. Nature, 406, 114.

    McNeill, J., Barrie, F.R., Burdet, H.M., Demoulin, V., Hawksworth, D.L., Marhold, K., Nicolson, D.H., Prado, J., Silva, P.C., Skog, J.E., Wiersema, J.H. & Turland, N.J., (Eds.) (2006) International code of botanical nomenclature (Vienna Code) adopted by the Seventeenth International Botanical Congress, Vienna, Austria, July 2005. Koeltz, Königstein, 586 pp.

    Mendes Pontes, A.R., Malta, A. & Asfora, P.H. (2006) A new species of capuchin monkey, genus Cebus Erxleben (Cebidae, Primates): found at the very brink of extinction in the Pernambuco Endemism Centre. Zootaxa, 1200, 1– 12.

    Ng, P.K.L. (1994) The citation of species names and the role of the author’s name. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, 42, 509– 513.

    Nussbaum, R.A. & Wilkinson, M. (1989) On the classification and phylogeny of caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona), a critical review. Herpetological Monographs, 3, 1–42, frontispiece.

    Oliveira, M.M. de & Langguth, A. (2006) Rediscovery of Marcgrave’s Capuchin Monkey and designation of a neotype for Simia flavia Schreber, 1774 (Primates, Cebidae). Boletim do Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, (n.s.), 523, 1–16.

    Patterson, B.D. (2002) On the continuing need for scientific collecting of mammals. Journal of neotropical Mammalogy, 9, 253–262.

    Pauwels, O. & Chérot, F. (1998) Cryptoherpétologie et nomenclature: le problème et sa solution. Bulletin de la Société herpétologique de France, “1997”, 82–83, 41–49.

    Pauwels, O. & Meirte, D. (1996) The status of Cryptophidion annamense Wallach & Jones, 1992. Cryptozoology, 12, 95–100.

    Pennisi, E. (2001) Linnaeus’s last stand? Science, 291, 2304–2305, 2307.

    Polaszek, A., Grubb, P., Groves, C, Ehardt, C. L. & Butynski, T. M. (2005) What constitutes a proper description? Response. Science, 309, 2164–2166.

    Pouyaud, L., Wirjoatmodjo, S., Rachmatika, I., Tjakrawidjaja, A., Radiaty, R. & Hadie, W. (1999) Une nouvelle espèce de coelacanthe. Preuves génétiques et morphologiques. Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris (3, Sciences de la Vie), 322, 261–267.

    Quintart, A. (1989) Le marsupilami, une espèce nouvelle pour la science. Les Naturalistes belges, 70, 153–157.

    Remsen, J.V., Jr. (1995) The importance of continued collecting of bird specimens to ornithology and bird conservation. Bird Conservation international, 5, 145–180.

    Ride, W.D.L. (1999) Introduction. In: Anonymous (1999): xix–xxix.

    Scott, P. & Rines, R. (1975) Naming the Loch Ness monster. Nature, 258, 466–468.

    Simpson, G.G. (1940) Types in modern taxonomy. American Journal of Science, 238, 413–431.

    Sluys, R., Martens, K. & Schram, F.R. (2004) The PhyloCode: naming of biodiversity at a crossroads. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 280–281.

    Smith, E.F.G., Arctander, P., Fjeldså, J. & Amir, O. G. (1991) A new species of strike (Laniidae: Laniarius) from Somalia, verified by DNA sequence from the only known individual. Ibis, 133, 227–235, 1 pl.

    Stuebing, R.B. (1998) Faunal collecting in Southeast Asia: fundamental need or blood sport? Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, 46, 1–10.

    Stümpke, H. (1962) Anatomie et biologie des Rhinogrades, un nouvel ordre de Mammifères.Masson, Paris, 85 pp.

    Thalmann, U. & Geissmann, T. (2005) New species of woolly lemur Avahi (Primates: Lemuriformes) in Bernaraha (central western Madagascar). American Journal of Primatology, 67, 371–376.

    Thompson, D. (Ed.) (1995) The concise Oxford dictionary of current English. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1695 pp.

    Timm, R.M., Ramey, R.R. II & The Nomenclature Committee of the American Society of Mammalogists. (2005) What constitutes a proper description? Science, 309, 2163–2164.

    Vences, M., Glaw, F. & Böhme, W. (1999) A review of the genus Mantella (Anura, Ranidae, Mantellinae): taxonomy, distribution and conservation of Malagasy poison frogs. Alytes, 17, 3–72.

    Vieillard, J. (1976) La Sitelle kabyle. Alauda, 44, 351–352.

    Wakeham-Dawson, A., Morris, S. & Tubbs, P. (2002) Type specimens: dead or alive? Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 59, 282–284.

    Wallach, V. & Jones, G.S. (1992) Cryptophidion annamense, a new genus and species of cryptozoic snake from Vietnam (Reptilia: Serpentes). Cryptozoology, 11, 1–37.

    Weiner, J.S., Oakley, K P. & Le Gros Clarke, W. E. (1953) The solution to the Piltdown problem. Bulletin of the British Museum (Geology), 2 (3), 139–146.

    Wheeler, Q.D., Raven, P.H. & Wilson, E.O. (2004) Taxonomy: impediment or expedient? Science, 303, 285.

    Winker, K. (1996) The crumbling infrastructure of biodiversity: the avian example. Conservation Biology, 10, 703–707.