Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 5 No. 6: December 2022
Type: Article
Published: 2022-12-23
DOI: 10.11646/palaeoentomology.5.6.7
Page range: 569–578
Abstract views: 360
PDF downloaded: 19

Libanonemopalpus grimaldii, a new genus and species of Bruchomyiinae from Lower Cretaceous Lebanese amber (Diptera: Psychodidae)

State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China; Lebanese University, Faculty of Science II, Natural Sciences Department, Fanar - El-Matn, PO box 26110217, Lebanon
Laboratory of Evolutionary Entomology and Museum of Amber Inclusions, Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Parasitology, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, 59, Wita Stwosza St., PL80-308 Gdańsk, Poland
Mazraat Yachouh, El-Maten, Lebanon
Conde de Torrecedeira 36, 5C Vigo, Pontevedra 36202, Spain
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China; Lebanese University, Faculty of Science II, Natural Sciences Department, Fanar - El-Matn, PO box 26110217, Lebanon
Diptera Psychodidae Insecta new taxa lower Barremian Lebanese amber haematophagy

Abstract

Libanonemopalpus grimaldii gen. et sp. nov. is characterised, illustrated, and described from the lower Barremian amber of Bqaatouta (Lebanon). It represents the earliest record, the first and only Bruchomyiinae psychodid with functional piercing mouthparts. The discovery of this Cretaceous psychodid fly improves our knowledge of the palaeobiodiversity of Bruchomyiinae and particularly on the evolution of mouthparts in this group.

References

  1. Agnarsson, I. & Miller, J.A. (2008) Is ACCTRAN better than DELTRAN? Cladistics, 24 (6), 1032–1038. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00229.x

  2. Alexander, C.P. (1920) A new subfamily of Tanyderidae flies (Diptera). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 13, 402–406, pl. 32. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/13.4.402

  3. Alexander, C.P. (1940) Further observations on the psychodid subfamily Bruchomyinae (Diptera). Revista de Entomologia, 11, 793–799.

  4. Azar, D. & Maksoud, S. (2022a) Paleopsychoda jarzembowskii, a new Lower Cretaceous species of moth flies from Lebanese amber (Diptera: Psychodidae: Psychodinae) Palaeoentomology, 5 (3), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.5.3.9

  5. Azar, D. & Maksoud, S. (2022b) Libanophlebotomites ramyi, a new genus and species of phlebotomine sandflies from the Lower Cretaceous Lebanese amber (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae). Palaeoentomology, 5 (4), 340–346. https://doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.5.4.6

  6. Azar, D., Perrichot, V., Néraudeau, D. & Nel, A. (2003) New psychodids from the Cretaceous ambers of Lebanon and France, with a discussion of Eophlebotomus connectens Cockerell, 1920 (Diptera, Psychodidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 96 (2), 117‒126. https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2003)096[0117:NPFTCA]2.0.CO;2

  7. Byers, G.W. (1989) Homologies in wing venation of primitive Diptera and Mecoptera. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 91 (4), 497–501. https://biostor.org/reference/56407

  8. Congreve, C.R. & Lamsdell, J.C. (2016) Implied weighting and its utility in palaeontological datasets: a study using modelled phylogenetic matrices. Palaeontology, 59, 447–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12236

  9. Enderlein, G. (1936) Klassifikation der Psychodiden (Dipt.). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 1936, 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/mmnd.48019360301

  10. Felsenstein, J. (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39(4), 783–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x

  11. Galati, E.A.B. (2018) Phlebotominae (Diptera, Psychodidae): classification, morphology and terminology of adults and identification of American taxa. pp. 9–212. In: Rangel, E.F. & Shaw, J.J. (Eds), Brazilian sand flies: biology, taxonomy, medical importance and control. Brazilian Ministry of Health, FIOCRUZ, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Springer, 508 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75544-1_2

  12. Goloboff, P.A. & Catalano, S. (2016) TNT version 1.5, including a full implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics. Cladistics, 32, 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12160

  13. Goloboff, P.A., Farris, J. & Nixon, K. (2008) TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics, 24, 774–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00217.x

  14. Goloboff, P.A., Torres, A. & Arias, J.S. (2018) Weighted parsimony outperforms other methods of phylogenetic inference under models appropriate for morphology. Cladistics, 34, 407–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12205

  15. Granier, B., Toland, C., Gèze, R., Azar, D. & Maksoud, S. (2016) Some steps toward a new story for the Jurassic—Cretaceous transition in Mount Lebanon. Carnets de Géologie, 16 (8), 247–269. https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/59924

  16. Hennig, W. (1972) Insektenfossilien aus der unteren Kreide. IV. Psychodidae (Phlebotominae), mit einer kritischen Übersicht über das phylogenetische System der Familie und die bisher beschriebenen Fossilien (Diptera). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, Reihe B, 241, 1–69.

  17. Hillis, D.M. & Bull, J.J. (1993) An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology, 42 (2), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/42.2.182

  18. Krzemiński, W. & Krzemińska, E. (2003) Triassic Diptera: descriptions, revisions and phylogenetic relations. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, 46 (suppl.—Fossil Insects), 153–184.

  19. Kvifte, G.M. & Wagner, R. (2017) Psychodidae (sand flies, moth flies or owl flies). In: Kirk-Spriggs, A.H. & Sinclair, B.J. (Eds), Manual of Afrotropical Diptera. Volume 2. Nematocerous Diptera and lower Brachycera. Suricata 5. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, pp. 607–632.

  20. Linnaeus, C. (1758) Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum caracteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Vol. 1. Regnum animale. Editio decima, reformata. L. Salvii, Stockholm, 824 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542

  21. Macquart, P.J.M. (1838). Insectes diptères nouveaux ou peu connus. Tome premier. 1re partie. Paris, Roret, pp. 5–221 + 25 pls.

  22. Maddison, W.P. & Maddison, D.R. (2019) Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 3.61. (http://mesquiteproject.org)

  23. Maksoud, S. & Azar, D. (2020) Lebanese amber: latest updates. Palaeoentomology, 3 (2), 125–155. https://doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.3.2.2

  24. Maksoud, S., Azar, D., Granier, B. & Gèze, R. (2017) New data on the age of the Lower Cretaceous amber outcrops of Lebanon. Palaeoworld, 26 (2), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palwor.2016.03.003

  25. Maksoud, S., Granier, B. & Azar, D. (2022) Palaeoentomological (fossil insects) outcrops in Lebanon. Carnets de Géologie, 22 (16), 699–743. https://doi.org/10.2110/carnets.2022.2216

  26. Maksoud, S., Maalouf, M., Maalouf, R. & Azar, D. (2021) Baskinta and Bqaatouta: Two new early Barremian fossiliferous amber outcrops from Central Lebanon. Palaeoentomology, 4 (4), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.4.4.12

  27. McAlpine, J.F. (1981) Morphology and terminology—adults. In: McAlpine, J.F., Peterson, B.V., Shewell, G.E., Teskey, H.J., Vockeroth, J.R. & Wood, D.M. (coordinators), Manual of Nearctic Diptera. Volume 1. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Monograph No. 27, Ottawa, pp. 9‒63.

  28. Newman, E. (1834) Attempted division of British insects into natural orders. Entomological Magazine, 2, 379–431.

  29. Nixon, K.C. (2002) WinClada ver. 1.00.08. Ithaca, NY. Published by the author.

  30. Nixon, K.C. (2004) ASADO, version 1.61 TNT-MrBayes Slaver (vl 5.30). Ithaca, NY. Published by the author.

  31. Polseela, R., Wagner, R., Kvifte, G.M., Rulik, B. & Apiwathnasorn, C. (2018) Revision of Bruchomyiinae (Diptera, Psychodidae) of the Oriental Region, with description of a new genus and species and discussion of putative male/female antagonistic coevolution. Insect Systematics & Evolution, 50 (1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1163/1876312X-00002183

  32. Rondani, C. (1840) Sopra una specie di insetto dittero. Memoria prima per servire alla ditterologia italiana. Donati, Parma, 16 pp. + 1 pl.

  33. Rondani, C. (1856) Dipterologiae Italicae Prodromus. Vol. 1. Genera italica ordinis dipterorum ordinatim disposita et distincta et in familias et stirpes aggregata. Tipographia Alexandri Stoschi, Parmae, 226+[2] pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.8160

  34. Skibińska, K, Szadziewski, R., Kania, I. & Krzemiński, W. (2020) A new species of Bruchomyiinae (Diptera: Psychodidae) from Baltic amber. Zootaxa, 4838 (1), 147–150. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4838.1.10

  35. Stebner, F., Solórzano Kraemer, M.M., Ibáñez-Bernal, S. & Wagner, R. (2015a) Moth flies and sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in Cretaceous Burmese amber. PeerJ, 3, e1254. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1254

  36. Stebner, F., Solórzano Kraemer, M.M., Ibáñez-Bernal, S. & Wagner, R. (2015b) Datziinae as a new subfamily name for the unavailable name Protopsychodinae (Diptera: Psychodidae). PeerJ, 3, e1423. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1423

  37. Swofford, D.L. (2002) PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods), Version 4.0 Beta 10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.

  38. Tonnoir, A.L. (1922) Note sur le genre Nemopalpus (Psychodidae) et description d’une espèce nouvelle. Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique, 62, 125–136.

  39. Wagner, R. (2017) Synopsis of extinct Bruchomyiinae (Diptera, Psychodidae) from Burmese, Baltic and Dominican amber, with description of a new genera and species. Zootaxa, 4320, 100–120. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4320.1.6

  40. Wagner, R. & Stuckenberg, B.R. (2016) Cladistic analysis of subfamily Bruchomyiinae (Diptera: Psychodidae). Zootaxa, 4092, 151–174. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4092.2.1