Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 76 No. 2: 29 Dec. 2025
Type: Article
Published: 2025-12-29
DOI: 10.12976/jib/2025.76.2.2
Page range: 56-70
Abstract views: 58
PDF downloaded: 3

Diurnal butterfly diversity in a human-modified landscape of the subtropical montane forest of NW Argentina

Universidad Nacional de Jujuy, San Salvador de Jujuy, Argentina
Instituto de Ecología Regional (IER) Universidad Nacional de Tucumán (UNT) & Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET): San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán, AR
Instituto de Ecorregiones Andinas INECOA CONICET: San Salvador de Jujuy, Jujuy, AR
Instituto de Ecorregiones Andinas INECOA CONICET: San Salvador de Jujuy, Jujuy, AR
Universidad Nacional de Jujuy: San Salvador de Jujuy, Jujuy, AR
Instituto de Ecorregiones Andinas INECOA CONICET: San Salvador de Jujuy, Jujuy, AR
Lepidoptera butterflies species richness land use-change abundance Van Someren Rydon trap sweep net diurnal Nymphalidae Jujuy

Abstract

The change and intensification in land-use are currently among the main causes of species declines and local extinctions around the world. Therefore, forecasting changes in species diversity concerning habitat conditions may be crucial for conservation strategies. We explored diurnal lepidopteran diversity in a modified landscape of subtropical montane forests of Jujuy, NW Argentina. We considered that degradation of the natural forest habitat would likely impact resources crucial for butterflies, consequently altering both species richness and composition within these forests. We assessed and compared alpha diversity through Hill numbers diversity profiles and beta diversity through the beta-diversity partitioning. Additionally, we employed a permutational multivariate analysis of variance, and rank-abundance curves of butterfly species across different habitat types. Our results suggest that land-use changes diminish the number of forest-dependent species and increase species more tolerant to modified habitats and open areas. While alpha diversity did not decrease as land use changed, beta diversity showed significant changes in butterfly species composition, with a worrying reduction of forest-related species in altered habitats. Species composition became increasingly dominated by open area butterfly species resulting in biota homogenization, with potential consequences for ecosystem functioning and services in these forests. Further research on the mechanisms underlying the effects of human-induced habitat changes on forest butterfly diversity could help clarify which mitigation strategies are most likely to be successful for the conservation of butterflies of the subtropical montane forests.

References

  1. Anderson M. J. 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26(1): 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x

  2. Bauza J. A. T. 2000. Ciclo de vida de Biblis hyperia (Cramer) en Puerto Rico (Lepidoptera:Nymphalidae). Caribbean Journal of Science 36(1/2): 87–93.

  3. Barlow J. O. S., Overal W. L., Araujo I. S., Gardner T. A. & Peres C. A. 2007a. The value of primary, secondary and plantation forests for fruit‐feeding butterflies in the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Applied Ecology 44(5): 1001–1012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01347.x

  4. Barlow J., Gardner T. A., Araujo I. S., Ávila-Pires T. C., Bonaldo A. B., Costa J. E., Esposito M. C., Ferreira L. V., Hawes J., Hernandez M. I. M., Hoogmoed M. S., Leite R. N., Lo-Man-Hung N. F., Malcolm J. R., Martins M. B., Mestre L. A. M., Miranda-Santos R., Nunes-Gutjahr A. L., Overal W. L., Parry L., Peters S. L., Ribeiro-Junior M. A., da Silva M. N. F., da Silva Motta C. & Peres C. A. 2007b. Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(47): 18555–18560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703333104

  5. Barlow J., Araujo I. S., Overal W. L., Gardner T. A., da Silva Mendes F., Lake I. R. & Peres C. A. 2009. Diversity and composition of fruit-feeding butterflies in tropical Eucalyptus plantations. Plantation Forests and Biodiversity: Oxymoron or Opportunity? 9: 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2807-5_9

  6. Baselga A. 2010. Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Global ecology and biogeography 19(1): 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00490.x

  7. Bianchi A., Yañez C. & Acuña L. 2005. Base de datos mensuales de precipitaciones del Noroeste Argentino. Editorial INTA, EEA. Salta-Jujuy.

  8. Bonebrake T. C., Ponisio L. C., Boggs C. L. & Ehrlich P. R. 2010. More than just indicators: a review of tropical butterfly ecology and conservation. Biological Conservation 143(8): 1831–1841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.044

  9. Börschig C., Klein A. M., von Wehrden H. & Krauss J. 2013. Traits of butterfly communities change from specialist to generalist characteristics with increasing land-use intensity. Basic and Applied Ecology 14(7): 547–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2013.09.002

  10. Brown Jr. K. S. & Brown G. G. 1992. Habitat alteration and species loss in Brazilian forests. Tropical Deforestation and Species Extinction 10: 119–142.

  11. Brown A. D., Pacheco S., Lomáscolo T. & Malizia L. 2006. Situación ambiental en los bosques andinos yungueños. 52–72 pp. In: La situación ambiental Argentina 2005. (A. D. Brown, U. Martínez Ortiz, M. Acerbi, & J. Corcuera). Edición. Buenos Aires: Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina. 1–587 pp.

  12. Bruschini C., Simbula G., Benetello F., Dell’Olmo L., Lazzaro L., Mugnai M., Paola F., Pasquali L. & Dapporto L. 2024. Micro-habitat shifts by butterflies foster conservation strategies to preserve pollinator diversity in a warming Mediterranean climate. Ecological Indicators 166: 112253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112253

  13. Bonelli S., Cerrato C., Barbero F., Boiani M. V., Buffa G., Casacci L. P., Fracastoro L., Provenzale A., Rivella E., Zaccagno M. & Balletto E. 2021. Changes in alpine butterfly communities during the last 40 years. Insects 13(1): 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13010043

  14. Bubová T., Vrabec V., Kulma M. & Nowicki P. 2015. Land management impacts on European butterflies of conservation concern: A review. Journal of Insect Conservation 19: 805–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-015-9819-9

  15. Cabrera A. L. 1994. Regiones Fitogeográficas Argentinas. Editorial Acme S.A.C.I., Buenos Aires, Argentina. Reimpresión. 85 pp.

  16. Canals G.R. 2000. Mariposas bonaerenses. LOLA, Buenos Aires, 347 pp.

  17. Canals G.R. 2003. Mariposas de Misiones. LOLA, Buenos Aires, 325 pp.

  18. Cavanzón-Medrano L. E., Machkour-M’Rabet S., Chablé-Iuit, L. R., Pozo C., Hénaut Y. & Legal L. 2018. Effect of Climatic Conditions and Land Cover on Genetic Structure and Diversity of Eunica tatila (Lepidoptera) in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Diversity 10(3): 1–79. https://doi.org/10.3390/d10030079

  19. Chao A. & Jost L. 2012. Coverage‐based rarefaction and extrapolation: standardizing samples by completeness rather than size. Ecology 93(12): 2533–2547. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1952.1

  20. Checa M. F., Rodriguez J., Willmott K. R., & Liger B. 2014. Microclimate variability significantly affects the composition, abundance and phenology of butterfly communities in a highly threatened neotropical dry forest. Florida Entomologist 97(1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.097.0101

  21. Checa M. F., Donoso D. A., Rodriguez J., Levy E., Warren A. & Willmott K. 2019. Combining sampling techniques aids monitoring of tropical butterflies. Insect Conservation and Diversity 12(4): 362–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12328

  22. De Romero M. E. M. & De Sanguinetti M. M. G. 1989. Actualización taxonómica de Tragia (Euphorbiaceae) para Argentina y regiones limítrofes. Darwiniana 29(1/4): 77–138.

  23. DeVries P. J. 1987. Butterflies of Costa Rica and their natural history: Papilionidae, Pieridae, Nymphalidae. Vol. 1. New Jersey: Princeton. University Press, 97 pp.

  24. DeVries P. 1988. Stratification of fruit-feeding nymphalid butterflies in a Costa Rica rainforest. Journal of Research Lepidoptera 26(1–4): 98–108. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.266706

  25. Ekroos J., Heliölä J. & Kuussaari M. 2010. Homogenization of lepidopteran communities in intensively cultivated agricultural landscapes. Journal of Applied Ecology 47(2): 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01767.x

  26. Entrocassi F. G. 2015. Estudio de los bosques subtropicales de montaña de la Reserva Ecológica de Uso Múltiple Serranías de Zapla (Jujuy, Argentina): Composición florística, distribución de la vegetación y caracterización bioclimática. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Fac. Farmacia, Dept. Biología Vegetal II.

  27. Feinsinger P. 2004. El Diseño de Estudios de Campo para la Conservación de la Biodiversidad. Editorial FAN, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia, 454 pp.

  28. Fermon H., Waltert M., Vane-Wright R. I. & Mühlenberg M. 2005. Forest use and vertical stratification in fruit-feeding butterflies of Sulawesi, Indonesia: impacts for conservation. Biodiversity & Conservation 14: 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-5354-9

  29. Filgueiras B. K., Melo D. H., Uehara-Prado M., Freitas A.V. L., Leal I. R. & Tabarelli M. 2019. Compensatory dynamics on the community structure of fruit-feeding butterflies across hyper-fragmented Atlantic forest habitats. Ecological Indicators 98: 276–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.11.005

  30. Freitas A. V. L., Brown Jr. K. S. & Otero L. D. 1997. Juvenile stages of Cybdelis, a key genus uniting the diverse branches of the Eurytelinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Tropical Lepidoptera Research 8(1): 29–34.

  31. Freire Jr G. B., Silva T., Oliveira H., Collier C., Rodrigues H. P., Dias J. P., Diniz I. R., Santos J. P., Marini-Filho O. J., Freitas A. V. L., Smilanich A. M. & Dyer L. A. 2021. Good things come in larger packages: size matters for adult fruit-feeding butterfly dispersal and larval diet breadth. Diversity 13(12): 664. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13120664

  32. Guanuco A. del V. & Martin C. M. M. 2024. Mariposas diurnas asociadas a los bosques del ecotono Yungas-Chaco. Guía de campo en color laminada. The Field Museum, Chicago, 6 pp.

  33. Hallmann C. A., Ssymank A., Sorg M., de Kroon H., & Jongejans E. 2021. Insect biomass decline scaled to species diversity: General patterns derived from a hoverfly community. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118(2): e2002554117. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2002554117

  34. Izquierdo A. E. & Grau H. R. 2009. Agriculture adjustment, land-use transition and protected areas in Northwestern Argentina. Journal of Environmental Management 90(2): 858–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.02.013

  35. Kappelle M. & Brown A. D. 2001. Bosques nublados del Neotrópico. Editorial IMBIO, Costa Rica, 442 pp.

  36. Klimaitis J. F., Moschione F. N. & Klimaitis C. L. 2018a. Maravillas aladas de Argentina: Mariposas de la puna a la Patagonia. Ecoval, Córdoba, Argentina, 454 pp.

  37. Klimaitis J. F., Nuñez Bustos E. O., Klimaitis C. L. & Guller R. M. 2018b. Mariposas de Argentina: Guía de identificación. Vazquez Mazzini. Buenos Aires, Argentina, 327 pp.

  38. Lamas G. 2004. Checklist: Part 4 A. Hesperioidea-Papilionoidea. Atlas of Neotropical Lepidoptera: XXXVI (ed. by Heppner, J.B.), Association for Tropical Lepidoptera, Gainesville, USA, 439 pp.

  39. Lazzeri M. G., Bar M. E. & Pieri Damborsky M. 2011. Diversidad del orden Lepidoptera (Hesperioidea y Papilionoidea) de la ciudad Corrientes, Argentina. Revista de Biología Tropical 59(1): 299–308. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v59i1.3199

  40. Lucci Freitas A. V., Agra Iserhard C., Pereira Santos J., Oliveira Carreira I. J. Y. Bandini Ribeiro D., Alves Melo D. H. A., Rosa-Batista H. A. Marini-Fhilo J. O. Accacio G. M. & Uehara-Prado M. 2014. Studies with butterfly bait traps: an overview. Revista Colombiana de Entomología 40(2): 203–212.

  41. Malizia L., Pacheco S., Blundo C. & Brown A. D. 2012. Caracterización altitudinal, uso y conservación de las Yungas Subtropicales de Argentina. Ecosistemas 21(1–2): 53–73.

  42. Mielke O. H. H., Emery E. D. O. & Pinheiro C. E. G. 2008. As borboletas Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera, Hesperioidea) do Distrito Federal, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 52(2): 283–288. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262008000200008

  43. Nanni A. S., Piquer Rodríguez M., Rodriguez M. D., Núñez Regueiro M. M., Periago M. E., Aguiar S., Ballari S A., Blundo C. M., Derlindati E. J., Di Blanco Y. E., Eljall A., Grau H. R., Herrera L. P. Huertas-Herrera A., Izquierdo A. E., Lescano J. N., Machi L., Mazzini F., Milkovic M., Montti L. F. Paviolo A. J., Pereyra M., Quintana R. D., Quiroga V. A., Renison D., Beade S. M., Schaaf A. A. & Gasparri N. I. 2020. Presiones sobre la conservación asociadas al uso de la tierra en las ecorregiones terrestres de la Argentina. Ecología Austral 30: 304–320. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.20.30.2.0.1056

  44. Newbold T., Hudson L. N., Hill S. L. L., Contu S., Gray C. L., Scharlemann J. P. W., Börger L., Phillips H. R. P., Sheil D., Lysenko I. & Purvis A. 2016. Global patterns of terrestrial assemblage turnover within and among land uses. Ecography 39: 1151–1163. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01932

  45. Núñez Bustos E. 2010. Mariposas de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires y alrededores. Buenos Aires, Argentina, Vázquez Mazzini. Buenos Aires, Argentina, 264 pp.

  46. Orta S. C., Reyes-Agüero J. A., Luis-Martínez M. A., MuñozRobles C. A. & Méndez C. H. 2022. Las mariposas bioindicadoras ecológicas de México. Artículo de revisión. Acta Zoológica Mexicana 38: 1–33. https://doi.org/10.21829/azm.2022.3812488

  47. Ospina-López L. A., García-Pérez J. F., Villa-Navarro F. A. & Reinoso-Flórez G. 2010. Mariposas Pieridae (Lepidóptera: Papilionoidea) de la Cuenca del Río Coello (Tolima), Colombia. Actualidades Biológicas 32(93): 173–188. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.acbi.13813

  48. Pacheco S. & Brown A. 2006. Ecología y producción de cedro (Género Cedrela) en las Yungas Australes. 1-587. In: In: La situación ambiental Argentina 2005. A. Brown, U. Martínez Ortiz, M. Acerbi & J. Corcuera. Edición. Buenos Aires: Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina. 83–104 pp.

  49. Pastrana J. A. 2004. Los lepidópteros argentinos. Sus plantas hospedadoras y otros sustratos alimenticios. Sociedad Entomológica. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 334 pp.

  50. Picanco A., Rigal F., Matthews T. J., Cardoso P. & Borges P. A. 2017. Impact of land use change on flowers‐visiting insect communities on an oceanic island. Insect Conservation and Diversity 10(3): 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12216

  51. Politi N., Rivera L., Balducci E., Malizia L. R., Blundo C., Fornes L., Galarza M., Alcalde S., Aragón R., Bardavid S., Eliano P., Gómez D., Jayat P., Lupo L. C., Malizia A., Mangini G., Mayol E., Mazzini F., Molineri C., … & Brown A. D. 2021. Yungas. pp. 219–442. In: Uso sostenible del bosque: Aportes desde la Silvicultura Argentina. P. L. Peri, G. Martínez Pastur & T. Schlichter (editors.). Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible de la Nación. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina, 884 pp.

  52. Pollard E. & Yates T. J. 1993. Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation: The British butterfly monitoring scheme. Springer Science & Business Media. Londres, 61 pp.

  53. R Development Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/ ((Accessed 29 Dec. 2025)

  54. Ramos F. A. 2000. Nymphalid butterfly communities in an Amazonian forest fragment. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 35(1): 29–41. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.266570

  55. Reynolds C., Fletcher R. J., Carneiro C. M., Jennings N., Ke A., LaScaleia M. C., Lukhele M. B., Mamba M. L., Sibiya M. D., Austin J. D., Magagula C. N., Mahlaba T., Monadjem A., Wisely S. M. & McCleery R. A. 2018. Inconsistent effects of landscape heterogeneity and land-use on animal diversity in an agricultural mosaic: a multi-scale and multi-taxon investigation. Landscape Ecology 33: 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0595-7

  56. Ribeiro D. B., Batista R., Prado P. I., Brown K. S. & Freitas A. V. 2012. The importance of small scales to the fruit-feeding butterfly assemblages in a fragmented landscape. Biodiversity and Conservation 21: 811–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0222-x

  57. Salazar J. A. 2009. Catálogo de las Plantas Huésped de las Mariposas Neotropicales. Boletín Científico Centro de Museos de Historia Natural 13: 230–232.

  58. Sagwe R. N., Muya S. M. & Maranga R. 2015. Effects of land use patterns on the diversity and conservation status of butterflies in Kisii highlands, Kenya. Journal of Insect Conservation 19: 1119–1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-015-9826-x

  59. Shahabuddin G. & Terborgh J. W. 1999. Frugivorous butterflies in Venezuelan forest fragments: abundance, diversity and the effects of isolation. Journal of Tropical Ecology 15(6): 703–722. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467499001121

  60. Sparrow H. R., Sisk T. D., Ehrlich P. R. & Murphy D. D. 1994. Techniques and guidelines for monitoring neotropical butterflies. Conservation Biology 8(3): 800–809. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08030800.x

  61. Steffan‐Dewenter I. & Tscharntke T. 2000. Butterfly community structure in fragmented habitats. Ecology Letters 3(5): 449–456. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00175.x

  62. Supp S. R. & Ernest S. M. 2014. Species‐level and community‐level responses to disturbance: a cross‐community analysis. Ecology 95(7): 1717–1723. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-2250.1

  63. Thomas J. A., Telfer M. G., Roy D. B., Preston C. D., Greenwood J. J. D., Asher J. & Lawton J. H. 2004. Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crisis. Science 303(5665): 1879–1881. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1095046

  64. Thomas J. A. 2005. Monitoring change in the abundance and distribution of insects using butterflies and other indicator groups. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 360(1454): 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1585

  65. Thomas J. A. 2016. Butterfly communities under threat. Science 353(6296): 216–218. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf8838

  66. Uehara‐Prado M., Brown Jr. K. S. & Freitas A. V. L. 2007. Species richness, composition and abundance of fruit‐feeding butterflies in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: comparison between a fragmented and a continuous landscape. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16(1): 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2006.00267.x

  67. Ulrich W. & Gotelli J. N. 2007. Disentangling community patterns of nestedness and species co‐occurrence. Oikos 116(12): 2053–2061. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.16173.x

  68. Vasconcelos R. N., Cambui E. C. B., Mariano-Neto E., da Rocha P. L. B. & Cardoso M. Z. 2019. The role of Eucalyptus planted forests for fruit-feeding butterflies’ conservation in fragmented areas of the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Forest Ecology and Management 432: 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.09.017

  69. Veddeler D., Schulze C. H., Steffan-Dewenter I., Buchori D. & Tscharntke T. 2005. The contribution of tropical secondary forest fragments to the conservation of fruit-feeding butterflies: effects of isolation and age. Biodiversity & Conservation 14: 3577–3592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0829-2

  70. Villareal H. M., Álvarez M., Córdoba-Córdoba S., Escobar F., Fagua G., Gast F. & Umaña A. M. 2004. Manual de métodos para el desarrollo de inventarios de biodiversidad. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicas Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia, 454 pp.

  71. Volkmann L. & Núñez Bustos E. 2010. Mariposas Serranas de Argentina Central: guía de especies más comunes halladas en sierras, valles y salinas del centro oeste argentino (Córdoba, San Luis, La Rioja, Catamarca y Santiago del Estero). Equipo gráfico, Córdoba, Argentina, 454 pp.

  72. Warren A. D., Davis K. J., Stangeland E. M., Pelham J. P. & Grishin N. V. 2023. Illustrated Lists of American Butterflies. Available from: http://www. butterfliesofamerica (Accessed 12 Sep. 2024)