Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Article
Published: 2019-11-12
Page range: 438–450
Abstract views: 865
PDF downloaded: 328

A global catalog of primary reptile type specimens

Center for Biological Data Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Center for Biological Data Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, 1 William St, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia, and Sydney School of Veterinary Science B01, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle (MNHN), CNRS, Sorbonne Université, ISYEB (UMR 7205 MNHN/CNRS/UPMC/EPHE), Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (Reptiles), 57 rue Cuvier, CP 30, 75251 Paris, France.
The Natural History Museum (NHMUK), London SW7 5BD, UK.
Department of Herpetology, Zoological Institute (ZISP), Russian Academy of Sciences, St.Petersburg 199034 Universitetskaya nab. 1, Russia.
Museum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ), 26 Oxford St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History (USNM), Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA.
Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History (USNM), Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA.
Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History (USNM), Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA.
Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History (USNM), Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA.
Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum Senckenberg (SMF), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt a.M., Germany.
Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum (WAM), 49 Kew Street, Welshpool, Western Australia, 6016, Australia.
Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum (WAM), 49 Kew Street, Welshpool, Western Australia, 6016, Australia.
American Museum of Natural History (AMNH), Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, New York 10024-5192, USA.
California Academy of Sciences (CAS), 55 Music Concourse Drive, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA.
Field Museum (FMNH), 1400 S. Lake Shore Dr., Chicago, IL 60605, USA.
The Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University (ANSP), 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA.
Research Museum Center, University of Michigan (UMMZ), 3600 Varsity Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA.
Zoologische Staatssammlung München (ZSM-SNSB), Münchhausenstraße 21, 81247 München, Germany.
Zoologische Staatssammlung München (ZSM-SNSB), Münchhausenstraße 21, 81247 München, Germany.
Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum A. Koenig (ZFMK), Section of Herpetology, Adenauerallee 160, D-53113 Bonn, Germany.
Naturhistorisches Museum Wien (NMW), Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria.
Naturhistorisches Museum Wien (NMW), Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria.
Biodiversity, Queensland Museum (QM), PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Australia.
Biodiversity, Queensland Museum (QM), PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Australia.
Naturalis Biodiversity Center (RMNH), Darwinweg 2, 2333 CR Leiden, Netherlands.
School of Zoology and Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Tel-Aviv University (TAU), Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel.
School of Zoology and Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Tel-Aviv University (TAU), Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel.
4 Potter Park, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Reptilia syntype holotype neotype lectotype herpetological collections squamata serpentes sauria testudines

Abstract

We present information on primary type specimens for 13,282 species and subspecies of reptiles compiled in the Reptile Database, that is, holotypes, neotypes, lectotypes, and syntypes. These represent 99.4% of all 13,361 currently recognized taxa (11,050 species and 2311 subspecies). Type specimens of 653 taxa (4.9%) are either lost or not located, were never designated, or we did not find any information about them. 51 species are based on iconotypes. To map all types to physical collections we have consolidated all synonymous and ambiguous collection acronyms into an unambiguous list of 364 collections holding these primary types. The 10 largest collections possess more than 50% of all (primary) reptile types, the 36 largest collections possess more than 10,000 types and the largest 73 collections possess over 90% of all types. Of the 364 collections, 107 hold type specimens of only 1 species or subspecies. Dozens of types are still in private collections. In order to increase their utility, we recommend that the description of type specimens be supplemented with data from high-resolution images and CT-scans, and clear links to tissue samples and DNA sequence data (when available). We request members of the herpetological community provide us with any missing type information to complete the list.

 

References

  1. Barrbadillo, L.J., Lacomba, J.I., Pêrez-Mellado, V., Sancho, V. & López-Jurado, L.F. (1999) Anfibios y Reptiles de la Peninsula Ibérica, Baleares y Canarias. Barcelona: Editorial Planeta, 419 pp.

    Böhme, W. (2005) Presence of Agama weidholzi Wettstein, 1932 in The Gambia, West Africa. Salamandra, 41, 155–158.

    Broeckhoven, C., Plessis, A.d., Roux, S.G.l., Fras Nortier Mouton, P.l. & Hui, C. (2016) Beauty is more than skin deep: a non-invasive protocol for in vivo anatomical study using micro-CT. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 8, 358–369.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12661

    Chaladze, G. (2017) Taxonomy should be more photography based–eliminate need of physical specimen to study morphology. Zootaxa, 4247 (3), 331.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4247.3.6

    Conix, S. (2018) Values, regulation, and species delimitation. Zootaxa, 4415 (2), 390–392.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4415.2.9

    Constable, H., Guralnick, R., Wieczorek, J., Spencer, C., Peterson, A.T. & VertNet Steering, C. (2010) VertNet: a new model for biodiversity data sharing. PLoS Biol, 8, e1000309.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000309

    David, P., Vogel, G. & Dubois, A. (2011) On the need to follow rigorously the Rules of the Code for the subsequent designation of a nucleospecies (type species) for a nominal genus which lacked one: the case of the nominal genus Trimeresurus Lacépède, 1804 (Reptilia: Squamata: Viperidae). Zootaxa, 2992, 1–51.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2992.1.1

    Donegan, T. M. (2008) New species and subspecies descriptions do not and should not always require a dead type specimen. Zootaxa, 1761, 37–48.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4196.3.9

    Dubois, A. (2009) Endangered Species and Endangered Knowledge. Zootaxa, 2201, 26–29.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2201.1.5

    Dubois, A. (2010) Nomenclatural rules in zoology as a potential threat against natural history museums. Organisms Diversity & Evolution, 2010, 81–90.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-010-0015-1

    Dubois, A. (2017) The need for reference specimens in zoological taxonomy and nomenclature. Bionomina, 12, 4‒38.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.12.1.2

    Erp, M., Hense, l.R., Ceolin, D. & Meij, M. van der (2014) Georeferencing Animal Specimen Datasets. Transactions in GIS, 19, 563–581.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12110

    Faundez, E. I. (2017) Photography-based taxonomy: Is it necessary to reform the Code, and what that exactly means? Zootaxa, 4247 (3), 332.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4247.3.7

    Federhen, S. (2012) The NCBI Taxonomy database. Nucleic Acids Research, 40, D136–143.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1178

    Federhen, S. (2015) Type material in the NCBI Taxonomy Database. Nucleic Acids Research, 43, D1086–1098.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1127

    Fitzinger, L. (1843) Systema Reptilium, fasciculus primus, Amblyglossae. Wien: Braumüller & Seidel, 106 pp.

    https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.4694

    Frick, M. G. (2010) Misconceptions about the ability of researchers to relocate the holotype of the Galapagos pink land iguana through the use of a passive integrated transponder. Zootaxa, 2694, 57–58.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2694.1.4

    Fujita, M.K., Leache, A.D., Burbrink, F.T., McGuire, J.A. & Moritz, C. (2012) Coalescent-based species delimitation in an integrative taxonomy. Trends Ecol Evol, 27, 480-488.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.04.012

    Gentile, G. & Snell, H.L. (2009) Conolophus marthae sp.nov. (Squamata, Iguanidae), a new species of land iguana from the Galápagos archipelago. Zootaxa, 2201, 1-10

    Giribet, G. (2016) Genomics and the animal tree of life: conflicts and future prospects. Zoologica Scripta, 45, 14–21.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12215

    Grandcolas, P. (2017) Loosing the connection between the observation and the specimen: a by-product of the digital era or a trend inherited from general biology? Bionomina, 12, 57–62.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.12.1.7

    Guralnick, R.P., Zermoglio, P.F., Wieczorek, J., LaFrance, R., Bloom, D. & Russell, L. (2016) The importance of digitized biocollections as a source of trait data and a new VertNet resource. Database (Oxford), 2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baw158

    Harris, D.J., Belliure, J. & Cuervo, J.J. (2018) Melting pots and hotspots: genetic variation within Acanthodactylus erythrurus (Reptilia: Lacertidae) from the Iberian Peninsula. Amphibia-Reptilia.

    https://doi.org/10.1163/15685381-20181026

    Heinicke, M.P., Turk, D. & Bauer, A.M. (2017) Molecular phylogeny reveals strong biogeographic signal and two new species in a Cape Biodiversity Hotspot endemic mini-radiation, the pygmy geckos (Gekkonidae: Goggia). Zootaxa, 4312 (3), 449–470.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4312.3.3

    Hillis, D.M. (2019) Species Delimitation in Herpetology. Journal of Herpetology, 53, 3–12.

    https://doi.org/10.1670/18-123

    Junqueira-de-Azevedo, I.L., Campos, P.F., Ching, A.T. & Mackessy, S.P. (2016) Colubrid Venom Composition: An -Omics Perspective. Toxins (Basel), 8.

    https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8080230

    La Salle, J., Williams, K.J. & Moritz, C. (2016) Biodiversity analysis in the digital era. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 371, 1–10.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0337

    Leache, A., Wagner, P., Linkem, C., Böhme, W., Papenfuss, T., Chong, R.A., Lavin, B.R., Bauer, A.M., Nielsen, S.V., Greenbaum, E., Rödel, M.O., Schmitz, A., LeBreton, M., Ineich, I., Chirio, L., Ofori-Boateng, C., Eniang, E.A., Baha El Din, S., Lemmon, A.R. & Burbrink, F.T. (2014) A hybrid phylogenetic-phylogenomic approach for species tree estimation in African Agama lizards with applications to biogeography, character evolution, and diversification. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 79, 215‒230.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.06.013

    Li, J.T., Gao, Y.D., Xie, L., Deng, C., Shi, P., Guan, M.L., Huang, S., Ren, J.L., Wu, D.D., Ding, L., Huang, Z.Y., Nie, H., Humphreys, D.P., Hillis, D.M., Wang, W.Z. & Zhang, Y.P. (2018) Comparative genomic investigation of high-elevation adaptation in ectothermic snakes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 115, 8406–8411.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805348115

    Linnaeus, C. (1758) Systema naturæ per regna tria naturæ, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Editio Decima Reformata. 10th Edition. Laurentii Salvii, Holmiæ, 824 pp.

    https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542

    Lippert, C., Sabatini, R., Maher, M.C., Kang, E.Y., Lee, S., Arikan, O., Harley, A., Bernal, A., Garst, P., Lavrenko, V., Yocum, K., Wong, T., Zhu, M., Yang, W.Y., Chang, C., Lu, T., Lee, C.W.H., Hicks, B., Ramakrishnan, S., Tang, H., Xie, C., Piper, J., Brewerton, S., Turpaz, Y., Telenti, A., Roby, R.K., Och, F.J. & Venter, J.C. (2017) Identification of individuals by trait prediction using whole-genome sequencing data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 114, 10166–10171.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711125114

    Mediannikov, O., Trape, S. & Trape, J.F. (2012) A molecular study of the genus Agama (Squamata: Agamidae) in West Africa, with description of two new species and a review of the taxonomy, geographic distribution, and ecology of currently recognized species. Russian Journal of Herpetology, 19, 115–142.

    Merrem, B. (1820) Versuch eines Systems der Amphibien I (Tentamen Systematis Amphibiorum). J. C. Kriegeri, Marburg, 191 pp.

    https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.5037

    Sabaj, M.H. (2016) Standard symbolic codes for institutional resource collections in herpetology and ichthyology: an Online Reference. Version 6.5. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, Washington, D.C. [accessed 15 July 2019]

    Saenko, S.V., Lamichhaney, S., Martinez Barrio, A., Rafati, N., Andersson, L. & Milinkovitch, M.C. (2015) Amelanism in the corn snake is associated with the insertion of an LTR-retrotransposon in the OCA2 gene. Sci Rep, 5, 17118.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17118

    Seba, A. (1734) Locupletissimi Rerum naturalium Thesauri accurata Descriptio, et Iconibus artificiosissimus Expressio, per universam Physices Historiam. Opus, cui in hoc Rerum Genere, nullum par exstitit. Vol. 1. Janssonio-Waesbergios, Amsterdam, 178 pp.

    https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.62680

    Senna-Garraffoni, R.A. & Lucci-Freitas, A.V. (2017) Photos belong in the taxonomic Code. Science, 355, 805.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam7686

    Shatalkin, A.I. & Galinskaya, T.V. (2017) A commentary on the practice of using the so-called typeless species. ZooKeys, 693, 129–139.

    https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.693.10945

    Taylor, E.H. (1944) Present location of certain herpetological and other type specimens. University of Kansas Science Bulletin, 30, 117–187.

    https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.6507

    Thompson, A.C., Capellini, T.D., Guenther, C.A., Chan, Y.F., Infante, C.R., Menke, D.B., Kingsley, D.M. (2018) A novel enhancer near the Pitx1 gene influences development and evolution of pelvic appendages in vertebrates. Elife, 7, e38555.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.38555

    Trape, J.F., Trape, S. & Chirio, L. (2012) Lézards, crocodiles et tortues d’Afrique occidentale et du Sahara. IRD Orstom, Paris, 503 pp.

    Tschudi, J.J.v. (1845) Reptilium conspectum quae in republica Peruana reperiuntur er pleraque observata vel collecta sunt in itenere. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, 11, 150–170.

    Uetz, P., Freed, P. & Hošek, J. (2019) The Reptile Database. Available from: http://www.reptile-database.org (Accessed 13 Aug. 2019)

    Uetz, P. & Stylianou, A. (2018) The original descriptions of reptiles and their subspecies. Zootaxa, 4375 (2), 257–264.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4375.2.5

    Wagner, P., Wilms, T.M. & Böhme, W. (2009) Studies on African Agama V. On the origin of Lacerta agama Linnaeus, 1758 (Squamata: Agamidae). Bonner zoologische Beiträge, 56, 215–223.

    Zachos, F.E. (2013) Taxonomy: Species splitting puts conservation at risk. Nature, 494, 35.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/494035c

    Zhang, Z.-Q. (2017) Species names based on photographs: debate closed. Zootaxa, 4269 (4), 451-452.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4269.4.1