Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Articles
Published: 2012-04-19
Page range: 57–68
Abstract views: 44
PDF downloaded: 1

Ctenomys brasiliensis Blainville (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae): clarifying the geographic placement of the type species of the genus Ctenomys

Departamento de Genética, Prédio 43323, P.O. BOX 15053, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 91501-970, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Laboratório de Ecoepidemiologia de doença de Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365 Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, 21040-360, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Departamento de Genética, Prédio 43323, P.O. BOX 15053, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 91501-970, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Regional Integrada do Alto Uruguai e das Missões – Campus de Erechim. Av. Sete de Setembro 1621, Erechim, 99700-000, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Departamento de Genética, Prédio 43323, P.O. BOX 15053, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 91501-970, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 91501-970, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Mammalia type locality geometric morphometric Ctenomys pearsoni tuco-tucos

Abstract

The genus Ctenomys (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae) comprises more than 60 species of subterranean rodents. Despite the widedistribution of the genus in southern America, the type locality of the type species—Ctenomys brasiliensisBlainville—was long thought to be the State of Minas Gerais in southeastern Brazil, well outside the presently knowndistributional area of the genus. Since it has never been collected again in that State, the type locality of this species is stilla matter for investigation. In order to elucidate this question, we investigated the skull of the type specimens of C.brasiliensis. From geometric morphometrics comparisons with other species of the genus, and taking into account thelabel information, it was possible to rediscover the type locality of this species. There is no doubt that the specimen wascollected in Minas, in the department of Lavalleja, Uruguay. Nowadays in this area on the southern coast of Uruguay, onlypopulations of Ctenomys pearsoni Lessa and Langguth were recognized. We suggest that more studies must be done tobetter understand the taxonomic relation between C. pearsoni complex and the C. brasiliensis, the type species for the genus that was collected in Uruguay and never occurred in southeastern Brazil.

References

  1. Altuna, C.A. & Lessa, E.P. (1985) Penial morphology in Uruguayan species of Ctenomys (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae). Journal of Mammalogy, 66, 483–488.

    Baylac, M. & Friess, M. (2005) Fourier descriptors, procrustes superimposition and data dimensionality: an example of cranial shape analysis in modern human populations. In: Slice, D.E. (Ed.), Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology. Springer- Verlag, New York. pp. 145–162.

    Baylac, M. (2008) Rmorph: a R geometric and multivariate morphometrics library. Available from the author: baylac@mnhn.fr

    Blainville, H.M.D. (1826) Sur une nouvelle espèce de Rongeur fouisseur du Brésil. Bulletin de la Societe philomathique de Paris, 3, 62–64.

    Bonvicino, C.R., Oliveira, J.A. & D’Andrea, P.S. (2008) Guia dos Roedores do Brasil, com chaves para gêneros baseadas em caracteres externos. Centro Pan-Americano de Febre Aftosa - OPAS/OMS, Rio de Janeiro.120 pp.

    Cabrera A. & Yepes, J. (1960) Mamíferos Sud Americanos. Tomo II. Los ocultos o tucotucos. Ediar S.A. Editores. Buenos Aires.

    Cicchino, A.C., Castro, D.C. & Baldo, J.C. (2000) Elenco de los Phthiraptera (Insecta) hallados en distintas poblaciones locales de Ctenomys (Rodentia: Octodontidae) de Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, Bolivia, y Brasil. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, São Paulo, 41, 197–211.

    Contreras, J.R., Roig, V.G. & Suzarte, C.M. (1977) Ctenomys validus, una nueva especie de tunduque de la provincia de Mendoza (Rodentia: Octodontidae). Physis, 92, 159–162.

    Contreras, J.R & Berry, L.M. (1982). Ctenomys bonettoi, una nueva especie de tucu-tucu procedente de la Provincia del Chaco, Republica Argentina (Rodentia, Octodontidae). Diagnosis preliminar. Historia Natural, 14, 123–124.

    Contreras, J.R. (1995) Ctenomys osvaldoreigi, una nueva especie de tucu–tucu procedente de la sierras de Cordoba, Republica Argentina (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae). Notulas Faunisticas, 84, 1–3.

    Contreras, J.R. (2000) Ctenomys paraguayensis, una nueva especie de roedor excavador procedente del Paraguay Oriental (Mammalia, Rodentia, Ctenomyidae). Revista del museu Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, 2, 61–68.

    D’Anatro, A. & D’Elía, G. (2011) Incongruent patterns of morphological, molecular, and karyotypic variation among populations of Ctenomys pearsoni Lessa and Langguth, 1983 (Rodentia, Ctenomyidae). Mammalian Biology, 76, 36–40.

    D’Elía, G., Lessa, E.P. & Cook, J.A. (1999) Molecular phylogeny of tuco-tucos, genus Ctenomys (Rodentia, Octodontidae): Evaluation of the mendocinus species group and the evolution of asymmetric sperm. Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 6, 19–38.

    Dray, S. & Dufour, A.B. (2007) The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. Journal of Statistical Software, 22, 1–20.

    Dryden, I.L. & Mardia, K.V. (1998) Statistical Shape Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 347 pp.

    Evin, A., Baylac, M., Ruedi, M., Mucedda, M. & Pons, J.M. (2008) Taxonomy, skull diversity and evolution in a species complex of Myotis (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae): a geometric morphometric appraisal. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 95, 529–538.

    Fernandes, F.A., Fernández-Stolz, G.P., Lopes, C.M. & Freitas, T.R.O. (2007) The conservation status of the tuco-tucos, genus Ctenomys (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae), in southern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 4, 839–847.

    Fernandes, F.A., Fornel, R., Cordeiro-Estrela, P. & Freitas, T.R.O. (2009) Intra and interspecific skull variation in two sister species of the subterranean rodent genus Ctenomys (Rodentia-Ctenomyidae): coupling geometric morphometrics and chromosomal polymorphism. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 155, 220–237.

    Fonseca, G.A.B. da, Herrmann, G., Leite, Y. L. R., Mittermeier, R. A., Rylands, A. B. & Patton, J. L. (1996) Lista anotada dos mamíferos do Brasil. Occasional Papers in Conservation Biology, Conservation International do Brasil, Belo Horizonte, 38 pp.

    Freitas, T.R.O. & Lessa, E.P. (1984) Cytogenetics and morphology of Ctenomys torquatus (Rodentia - Octodontidae). Journal of Mammalogy, 65, 637–642.

    Freitas, T.R.O. (2006) Cytogenetics status of four Ctenomys species in the South of Brazil. Genetica, 126, 227–235.

    Kiblisky, P., Brum-Zorrilla, N., Perez, G. & Saez, F.A. (1977) Variabilidad cromosómica entre diversas poblaciones uruguayas del roedor cavador del género Ctenomys (Rodentia-Octodontidae). Mendeliana, 2, 85–93.

    Lacey, E.A., Patton, J.L. & Cameron, G.N. (2000) Life Underground: The Biology of Subterranean Rodents. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 449 pp.

    Lessa, E.P. & Langguth, A. (1983) Ctenomys pearsoni, n. sp. (Rodentia: Octodontidae), del Uruguay. Resúmenes y Comuniciones de las Jornadas de Ciencias Naturales del Uruguay, 3, 86–88.

    Lessa, E.P., Vassallo, A.I., Verzi, D.H., & Mora, M.S. (2008) Evolution of morphological adaptations for digging in living and extinct ctenomyid and octodontid rodents. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 95, 267–283.

    Lopez-Alves, F. (2000) State Formation and Democracy in Latin America, 1810-1900. Duke University Press, Durham, 231–236.

    Moojen, J. (1952) Os Roedores do Brasil. Ministério da Educação e Saúde. Instituto Nacional do Livro, Rio de Janeiro, 214 pp.

    Musser, G.G. & Carleton, M.D. (1993) Family Muridae. In: Wilson, D. E., Reeder, D. H. (Eds), Mammal Species of the World. A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Smithsonian Institution Press - Washington DC, pp. 501–755.

    Novak, R.M. (1999) Walker’s Mammals of the World. 6th edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2142 pp.

    Oliveira, J.A. & Bonvicino, C.R. (2006) Ordem Rodentia. In: Reis, N.R., Peracchi, A.L., Pedro, W.A. & Lima, I.P. (Eds), Mamíferos do Brasil, Londrina, . pp. 347–400.

    Parada, A. D’Elía, G., Bidau, C. & Lessa, E. (2011) Species groups and the evolutionary diversification of tuco-tucos, genus Ctenomys (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae). Journal of Mammalogy, 82(3), 671–682.

    Paradis, E., Strimmer, K., Claude, J., Jobb, G., Open-Rhein, R., Dultheil, J. & Bolker, N.B. (2006) APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R. R package version 1.8-2.

    R Development Core Team (2009) Stats – R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Development Core Team. Available at: http://www.r-project.org

    Redford, K.H. & Eisenberg, J.F. (1999) Mammals of the Neotropics. The Central Neotropics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, vol. 3, 609 pp.

    Reig, O.A., Busch, C., Contreras, M.O. & Ortells, J.R. (1990) An overview of evolution, systematics, population and speciation in Ctenomys. In: Nevo, E., Reig, O.A. and Liss, A.R. (Eds), Evolution of Subterranean Mammals at the Organismal and Molecular Levels. New York, pp. 71–96.

    Reis, N.R. & Perachi, A.L. (2010) Mamíferos do Brasil: Guia de Identificação. Technical Books Editora. Rio de Janeiro, 557 pp

    Rohlf, F.J. & Marcus, L.F. (1993) A revolution in morphometrics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 8(4), 129–132.

    Rohlf, F.J. (2004) TPSDig, Version 1.40. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York.

    Rosi, M.I., Cona, M.I. & Roig, V.G. (2002) Estado actual del conocimiento del roedor fosorial Ctenomys mendocinus Philippi 1869 (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae).Mastozoologia Neotropical, 9, 277–295.

    Venables, W.N. & Ripley, B.D. (2002) Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th ed., : Springer, New York,495 pp.

    Wilson, D.E. & Reeder, D.M. (2005) Mammal Species of the World. A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. 3rd ed. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2142 pp.