Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Article
Published: 2026-10-02
Page range: 193-217
Abstract views: 1092
PDF downloaded: 14

Tiny jewels of the forest: A new and endangered species of Excidobates (Anura: Dendrobatidae) from southeastern Ecuador

Jungle Dave’s Science Foundation; San Juan Bosco; Morona Santiago; Ecuador; Unidad de Investigación; Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad (INABIO); Quito; Ecuador; Museo de Zoología; Laboratorio de Zoología Terrestre; Instituto de Biodiversidad Tropical IBIOTROP; Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales; Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ; Quito; Ecuador
Museo de Zoología de la Universidad del Azuay MZUA; Facultad de Ciencia y Tecnología; Universidad del Azuay; Cuenca; Ecuador; Fundación Nukamp; José Joaquín de Olmedo 1-61 y González Suárez; Cuenca; Ecuador
Current address: General Leonidas Plaza Gutiérrez; Limón Indanza; Morona Santiago; Ecuador
Jungle Dave’s Science Foundation; San Juan Bosco; Morona Santiago; Ecuador; Fundación Nukamp; José Joaquín de Olmedo 1-61 y González Suárez; Cuenca; Ecuador
Unidad de Investigación; Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad (INABIO); Quito; Ecuador; Department of Biology; University of Central Florida; Orlando; FL; USA
Museo de Zoología QCAZ; Centro de Investigaciones de la Biodiversidad CIBIO; Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador; Quito; Ecuador
Museo de Zoología QCAZ; Centro de Investigaciones de la Biodiversidad CIBIO; Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador; Quito; Ecuador
Amphibia Andes conservation Ecuador phylogeny taxonomy

Abstract

Poison dart frogs are one of the most studied and charismatic groups of amphibians, yet diversity within small and geographically restricted genera such as Excidobates remains incompletely understood. Until recently, this genus was known to comprise only three species distributed across the eastern mountain ranges of southern Ecuador and northern Peru. Here, we describe a new species represented by two populations in southern Ecuador: one from the eastern slopes of the Andes and another from north of Cordillera del Cóndor. The new species is more closely related to Excidobates mysteriosus, from which it differs by a genetic distance of 2.7–3.5% (16S rRNA gene) and markedly distinctive morphology such as 15.1–18.3 mm on snout-vent length and strongly granular skin. The two populations of the new species differ markedly in color from each other and from E. mysteriosus: scarlet red mottled dorsal coloration on a black background and a red-orange and black reticulated venter in the Central Andean Cordillera population, and green dorsal coloration with inconspicuous yellow spots and a yellow and black reticulated venter in the Cordillera del Cóndor population. Its advertisement call has 24–26 pulses, dominant frequency 4781.3–5062.5 Hz, and 0.51–0.56 s duration. The two populations are separated by 65 km, inhabit different forest types and have a genetic distance of 0.6–0.7%. Despite the marked color and habitat differences, the combined evidence indicates that the two populations represent polymorphic variants of the same species. Because the new species faces severe and imminent threats, including large and medium-scale mining, hydroelectric development, and illegal wildlife trade, we propose to assign it to the Red List category as Critically Endangered. Our findings highlight the rich but still underestimated amphibian diversity of the southeastern Ecuadorian Andes and underscore the urgent need for conservation actions in these regions.

References

  1. Almendáriz, A., Ron, S.R. & Brito, J. (2012) Una especie nueva de rana venenosa de altura del género Excidobates (Dendrobatoidea: Dendrobatidae) de la Cordillera del Cóndor. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, 52 (26), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0031-10492012002600001
  2. Angulo, A., Rueda-Almonacid, J.V., Rodríguez-Mahecha, J.V. & La Marca, E. (2006) Técnicas de inventario y monitoreo para los anfibios de la región tropical andina. Conservación Internacional, Serie Manuales de Campo Nº 2. Panamericana Formas e Impresiones SA, Bogotá D.C., 298 pp.
  3. Beaupre, S.J., Jacobson, E.R., Lillywhite, H.B. & Zamudio, K.R. (2004) Guidelines for use of live amphibians and reptiles in field and laboratory research. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, 24 pp.
  4. Brown, J.L., Twomey, E., Pepper, M. & Rodriguez, M.S. (2008) Revision of the Ranitomeya fantastica species complex with description of two new species from Central Peru (Anura: Dendrobatidae). Zootaxa, 1823, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1823.1.1
  5. Brown, J.L., Twomey, E., Amézquita, A., De Souza, M.B., Caldwell, J.P., Lötters, S., Von May, R., Melo-Sampaio, R.M., Mejía-Vargas, D., Perez-Peña, P., Pepper, M., Poelman, E.H., Sanchez-Rodriguez, M. & Summers, K. (2011) A taxonomic revision of the Neotropical poison frog genus Ranitomeya (Amphibia: Dendrobatidae). Zootaxa, 3083 (1), 1–120. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3083.1.1
  6. Brusa, O., Bellati, A., Meuche, I., Mundy, N.I. & Pröhl, H. (2013) Divergent evolution in the polymorphic granular poison‐dart frog, Oophaga granulifera: genetics, coloration, advertisement calls and morphology. Journal of Biogeography, 40 (2), 394–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02786.x
  7. Chaves-Portilla, G.A., Salazar, E.N., Gil-Acero, J., Dorado-Correa, A., Márquez, R., Rueda-Almonacid, J.V. & Amézquita, A. (2021) A new species of Andean golden poison frog (Andinobates, Dendrobatidae) from the Eastern Andes of Colombia. Zootaxa, 5047 (5), 531–546. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5047.5.4
  8. Cisneros-Heredia, D.F., Yánez-Muñoz, M.H., Sánchez-Nivicela, J.C. & Ron, S.R. (2023) Two new syntopic species of glassfrogs (Amphibia, Centrolenidae, Centrolene) from the southwestern Andes of Ecuador. PeerJ, 11, e15195. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15195
  9. Clough, M. & Summers, K. (2000) Phylogenetic systematics and biogeography of the poison frogs: evidence from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 70, 515–540. https://doi.org/10.1006/bijl.1999.0418
  10. Coloma, L.A. & Duellman, W.E. (2025) Amphibians of Ecuador. Volume II: Pipidae, Telmatobiidae, Microhylidae, Dendrobatidae, Ranidae, Bufonidae, Hylidae. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 643 pp. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003543886
  11. Darst, C.R., Cummings, M.E. & Cannatella, D.C. (2006) A mechanism for diversity in warning signals: conspicuousness versus toxicity in poison frogs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103 (15), 5852–5857. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0600625103
  12. Darst, C.R., Menéndez-Guerrero, P.A., Coloma, L.A. & Cannatella, D.C. (2005) Evolution of dietary specialization and chemical defense in poison frogs (Dendrobatidae): a comparative analysis. The American Naturalist, 165 (1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1086/426599
  13. Dufresnes, C., Poyarkov, N. & Jablonski, D. (2023) Acknowledging more biodiversity without more species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120 (40), e2302424120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2302424120
  14. Edmonds, D. (2021) Poison frogs traded and maintained by US private breeders. Herpetological Review, 52 (4), 806–811.
  15. Frost, D.R., Grant, T., Faivovich, J., Bain, R.H., Haas, A., Haddad, C.F.B., De Sa, R.O., Channing, A., Wilkinson, M., Donnellan, S.C., Raxworthy, C.J., Campbell, J.A., Blotto, B.L., Moler, P., Drewes, R.C., Nussbaum, R.A., Lynch, J.D., Green, D.M. & Wheeler, W.C. (2006) The amphibian tree of life. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 297, 1–370. https://doi.org/10.5531/sd.sp.13
  16. Frost, D.R. (2026) Amphibian Species of the World: An online reference (Version 6.2). American Museum of Natural History, New York. Available from: https://amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org/ (accessed 14 July 2026) https://doi.org/10.5531/db.vz.0001
  17. Gallegos-Riofrío, C.A., Moncayo-Altamirano, M.A., Terán-Valdez, A., Redin-Guerrero, G., Varela, C., Posner, S. & Carrasco-Torrontegui, A. (2025) Frogs, coalitions, and mining: Transformative insights for planetary health and earth system law from Ecuador’s struggle to enforce Nature’s rights. Earth System Governance, 24, 100253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2023.100253
  18. González-Santoro, M., Sudekum, H.J., Murphy, S.N., Richards, R.P., Yang, Y. & Richards-Zawacki, C.L. (2025) Sexual selection’s role in the persistence of polymorphism in an aposematic signal. Evolution, 79, 2643–2653. https://doi.org/10.1093/evolut/qpaf189
  19. Grant, T., Frost, D.R., Caldwell, J.P., Gagliardo, R., Haddad, C.F.B., Kok, P.J.R., Means, D.B., Noonan, B.P., Schargel, W.E. & Wheeler, W.C. (2006) Phylogenetic systematics of dart-poison frogs and their relatives (Amphibia: Athesphatanura: Dendrobatidae). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 299, 1–262. https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0090(2006)299[1:PSODFA]2.0.CO;2
  20. Grant, T., Rada, M., Anganoy-Criollo, M., Batista, A., Dias, P.H., Jeckel, A.M., Machado, D.J. & Rueda-Almonacid, J.V. (2017) Phylogenetic systematics of dart-poison frogs and their relatives revisited (Anura: Dendrobatoidea). South American Journal of Herpetology, 12, S1–S90. https://doi.org/10.2994/SAJH-D-17-00017.1
  21. Guillory, W.X., Muell, M.R., Summers, K. & Brown, J.L. (2019) Phylogenomic reconstruction of the Neotropical poison frogs (Dendrobatidae) and their conservation. Diversity, 11 (8), 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/d11080126
  22. Guindon, S., Dufayard, J.F., Lefort, V., Anisimova, M., Hordijk, W. & Gascuel, O. (2010) New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology, 59 (3), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq010
  23. Hagemann, S. & Pröhl, H. (2007) Mitochondrial paraphyly in a polymorphic poison frog species (Dendrobatidae; D. pumilio). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 45 (2), 740–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2007.06.010
  24. Hagman, M. & Forsman, A. (2003) Correlated evolution of conspicuous coloration and body size in poison frogs (Dendrobatidae). Evolution, 57 (12), 2904–2910. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01527.x
  25. IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group. (2019) Andinobates abditus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T55170A98646845. Available from: https://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed 31 October 2025) https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T55170A98646845.en
  26. IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group. (2018) Excidobates captivus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2018: e.T55178A89200615. Available from: https://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed 31 October 2025) https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2018-2.RLTS.T55178A89200615.en
  27. IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group. (2018) Excidobates mysteriosus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2018: e.T55193A89201026. Available from: https://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed 31 October 2025) https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2018-2.RLTS.T55193A89201026.en
  28. IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group. (2019) Excidobates condor. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T78500583A98658744. Available from: https://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed 31 October 2025) https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T78500583A98658744.en
  29. K. Lisa Yang Center for Conservation Bioacoustics. (2024) Raven Pro: Interactive Sound Analysis Software (Version 1.6.5) [Computer software]. The Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. Available from: https://ravensoundsoftware.com/
  30. Kahn, T.R., La Marca, E., Lötters, S., Brown, J.L., Twomey, E. & Amézquita, A. (Eds.) (2016) Aposematic poison frogs (Dendrobatidae) of the Andean countries: Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Venezuela. Conservation International, Arlington, Virginia, 588 pp.
  31. Katoh, K. & Standley, D.M. (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30 (4), 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
  32. Köhler, J., Jansen, M., Rodriguez, A., Kok, P.J., Toledo, L.F., Emmrich, M., Glaw, F., Haddad, C.F.B., Rödel, M.-O., Vences, M. & Ernst, R. (2017) The use of bioacoustics in anuran taxonomy: theory, terminology, methods and recommendations for best practice. Zootaxa, 4251 (1), 1–124. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4251.1.1
  33. Ligges, U., Krey, S., Mersmann, O. & Schnackenberg, S. (2013) tuneR: Analysis of music and speech. R package version 1.0.6. Available from: https://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/tuner
  34. López-Hervas, K., Santos, J.C., Ron, S.R., Betancourth-Cundar, M., Cannatella, D.C. & Tarvin, R.D. (2024) Deep divergences among inconspicuously colored clades of Epipedobates poison frogs. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 195, 108065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2024.108065
  35. Mayani-Parás, F., Botello, F., Castañeda, S. & Sánchez-Cordero, V. (2019) Impact of habitat loss and mining on the distribution of endemic species of amphibians and reptiles in Mexico. Diversity, 11 (11), 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/d11110210
  36. Mayer, M., Justicia, L.S. & Rojas, B. (2025) Phenotypic divergence across populations does not affect habitat selection in an Amazonian poison frog. Global Ecology and Conservation, 57, e03358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03358
  37. McDiarmid, R.W. (1994) Preparing amphibians as scientific specimens. In: Heyer, W.R., Donnelly, M.A., McDiarmid, R.W., Hayek, L.-A.C. & Foster, M.S. (Eds.), Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 289–297.
  38. Minh, B.Q., Schmidt, H.A., Chernomor, O., Schrempf, D., Woodhams, M.D., von Haeseler, A. & Lanfear, R. (2020) IQ-TREE 2: New Models and Efficient Methods for Phylogenetic Inference in the Genomic Era. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 37 (5), 1530–1534. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa015
  39. Myers, C.W. (1982) Spotted poison frogs: Descriptions of three new Dendrobates from western Amazonia and resurrection of a lost species from “Chiriqui”. American Museum Novitates, 2731, 1–23.
  40. Myers, C.W. & Daly, J.W. (1976) A new species of poison frog (Dendrobates) from Andean Ecuador, including an analysis of its skin toxins. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas, 59, 1–12.
  41. Nguyen, L.T., Schmidt, H.A., von Haeseler, A. & Minh, B.Q. (2015) IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 32 (1), 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300
  42. Ortega-Andrade, H.M., Rodes-Blanco, M., Cisneros-Heredia, D.F., Guerra-Arévalo, N., López de Vargas-Machuca, K.G., Sánchez-Nivicela, J.C., Armijos-Ojeda, D., Cáceres Andrade, J.F., Reyes-Puig, C., Quezada Riera, A.B., Székely. P., Rojas Soto, O.R., Székely, D., Guayasamin, J.M., Siavichay Pesántez, F.R., Amador, L., Betancourt, R., Ramírez-Jaramillo, S.M., Timbe-Borja, B., Gómez Laporta, M., Webster Bernal, J.F., Oyagata Cachimuel, L.A., Chávez Jácome, D., Posse, V., Valle-Piñuela, C., Padilla Jiménez, D., Reyes-Puig, J.P., Terán-Valdez, A., Coloma, L.A., Pérez Lara, M.B., Carvajal-Endara, S., Urgilés, M. & Yánez-Muñoz, M.H. (2021) Red List assessment of amphibian species of Ecuador: a multidimensional approach for their conservation. PLOS ONE, 16 (5), e0251027. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251027
  43. Ortiz, D.A., Frenkel, C. y Ron, S.R. (2022) Andinobates abditus. In: Ron, S. R., Merino-Viteri, A. & Ortiz, D. A. (Eds.), Anfibios del Ecuador. Version 2024.0. Museo de Zoología, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador. Available from: https://bioweb.bio/faunaweb/amphibiaweb/FichaEspecie/Andinobates%20abditus (accessed 30 July 2026)
  44. Paradis, E. & Schliep, K. (2019) ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R Schwartz, R. (Ed). Bioinformatics, 35 (3), 526–528. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty633
  45. Portik, D.M., Streicher, J.W. & Wiens, J.J. (2023) Frog phylogeny: A time-calibrated, species-level tree based on hundreds of loci and 5,242 species. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 188, 107907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2023.107907
  46. R Core Team (2025) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/
  47. Ron, S.R. (2018) Base de datos de la colección de anfibios del Museo de Zoología QCAZ. (Versión 1.0.). Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador. Available from: https://bioweb.bio/portal/ (accessed 23 July 2026)
  48. Ron, S.R., García, D., Brito-Zapata, D., Reyes-Puig, C., Figueroa-Coronel, E. & Cisneros-Heredia, D.F. (2024b) A new glassfrog of the genus Centrolene (Amphibia, Centrolenidae) from the Subandean Kutukú Cordillera, eastern Ecuador. Zoosystematics and Evolution, 100 (3), 923–939. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.100.116001
  49. Ron, S.R., Merino-Viteri, A. & Ortiz, D.A. (2024a) Anfibios del Ecuador (Version 2024.0). Museo de Zoología, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador. Available from: https://bioweb.bio/faunaweb/amphibiaweb
  50. Sánchez-Nivicela, J.C., Falcón-Reibán, J.M. & Cisneros-Heredia, D.F. (2023) A new stream treefrog of the genus Hyloscirtus (Amphibia, Hylidae) from the Río Negro-Sopladora National Park, Ecuador. ZooKeys, 1141, 75–97. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1141.97325
  51. Santos, J.C. & Cannatella, D.C. (2011) Phenotypic integration emerges from aposematism and scale in poison frogs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 6175–6180. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010952108
  52. Santos, J.C., Coloma, L.A. & Cannatella, D.C. (2003) Multiple, recurring origins of aposematism and diet specialization in poison frogs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100 (22), 12792–12797. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2133521100
  53. Santos, J.C., Coloma, L.A., Summers, K., Caldwell, J.P., Ree, R. & Cannatella, D.C. (2010) Correction: Amazonian amphibian diversity is primarily derived from late Miocene Andean lineages. PLOS Biology, 8 (9), e1000492. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000492
  54. Schulte, R. (1990) Redescubrimiento y redefinición de Dendrobates mysteriosus (Myers 1982) de la Cordillera del Cóndor. Boletín de Lima, 70, 57–68.
  55. Simmons, J.E. & Muñoz-Saba, Y. (Eds.) (2005) Cuidado, manejo y conservación de las colecciones biológicas. Univesidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, 288 pp.
  56. Sueur, J., Aubin, T. & Simonis, C. (2008) Seewave, a free modular tool for sound analysis and synthesis. Bioacoustics, 18 (2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2008.9753600
  57. Summers, K., Symula, R., Clough, M. & Cronin, T. (1999) Visual mate choice in poison frogs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 266 (1434), 2141–2145. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0900
  58. Symula, R., Schulte, R. & Summers, K. (2001) Molecular phylogenetic evidence for a mimetic radiation in Peruvian poison frogs supports a Müllerian mimicry hypothesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 268 (1484), 2415–2421. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1812
  59. Székely, P., Córdova-Díaz, M., Hualpa-Vega, D., Hualpa-Vega, S. & Székely, D. (2023a) A new glassfrog species of the genus Centrolene (Amphibia, Anura, Centrolenidae) from Cordillera del Cóndor, southern Ecuador. ZooKeys, 1149, 53–71. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1149.100041
  60. Székely, P., Székely, D., Armijos-Ojeda, D., Hualpa-Vega, S. & Vörös, J. (2023b) Molecular and morphological assessment of rain frogs in the Pristimantis orestes species group (Amphibia: Anura: Strabomantidae) with the description of three new cryptic species from southern Ecuador. Herpetological Monographs, 37 (1), 41–69. https://doi.org/10.1655/HERPMONOGRAPHS-D-22-00004.1
  61. Tarvin, R.D., Powell, E.A., Santos, J.C., Ron, S.R. & Cannatella, D.C. (2017) The birth of aposematism: High phenotypic divergence and low genetic diversity in a young clade of poison frogs. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 109, 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.12.035
  62. Twomey, E. & Brown, J.L. (2008) Spotted poison frogs: rediscovery of a lost species and a new genus (Anura: Dendrobatidae) from northwestern Peru. Herpetologica, 64 (1), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1655/07-031.1
  63. Twomey, E., Yeager, J., Brown, J.L., Morales, V., Cummings, M. & Summers, K. (2013) Phenotypic and genetic divergence among poison frog populations in a mimetic radiation. PLOS ONE, 8 (2), e55443. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055443
  64. Twomey, E., Vestergaard, J.S. & Summers, K. (2014) Reproductive isolation related to mimetic divergence in the poison frog Ranitomeya imitator. Nature Communications, 5, 4749. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5749
  65. Twomey, E., Delia, J., Fashé, M., Venegas, P.J. & Schulte, L.M. (2020) A new distribution record and updated conservation assessment of the endangered Marañón poison frog, Excidobates mysteriosus (Amphibia: Dendrobatidae). Salamandra, 56 (1), 71–74.
  66. Twomey, E., Kain, M., Claeys, M., Summers, K., Castroviejo-Fisher, S. & Van Bocxlaer, I. (2020) Mechanisms for color convergence in a mimetic radiation of poison frogs. The American Naturalist, 195 (5), E132–E149. https://doi.org/10.1086/708157
  67. UICN. (2012) Categorías y criterios de la Lista Roja de la UICN: Versión 3.1. 2nd ed. UICN, Gland, Suiza y Cambridge, Reino Unido.
  68. Vences, M., Kosuch, J., Boistel, R., Haddad, C.F.B., La Marca, E., Lötters, S. & Veith, M. (2003) Convergent evolution of aposematic coloration in Neotropical poison frogs: A molecular phylogenetic perspective. Organisms Diversity & Evolution, 3 (3), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1078/1439-6092-00082
  69. Wang, I.J. & Summers, K. (2010) Genetic structure is correlated with phenotypic divergence rather than geographic isolation in the highly polymorphic strawberry poison‐dart frog. Molecular Ecology, 19 (3), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04465.x
  70. Wollenberg, K.C., Lötters, S., Mora-Ferrer, C. & Veith, M. (2008) Disentangling composite colour patterns in a poison frog species. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 93 (3), 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00900.x
  71. Yeager, J. & Zarling, A. (2020) Mediating ethical considerations in the conservation and sustainable biocommerce of the jewels of the rainforest. Journal for Nature Conservation, 54, 125803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125803

How to Cite

Sánchez-Nivicela, J.C., Falcón-Reibán, J.M., Lituma, M.C., Fajardo-Torres, J.D., Urgiles, V.L., Apunte-Ramos, K. & Ron, S.R. (2026) Tiny jewels of the forest: A new and endangered species of Excidobates (Anura: Dendrobatidae) from southeastern Ecuador. Zootaxa, 5886 (2), 193–217. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5886.2.2