Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Correspondence
Published: 2020-01-31
Page range: 63–66
Abstract views: 408
PDF downloaded: 344

Taxonomy at a crossroads: Communicating value, building capability, and seizing opportunities for the future

University of Auckland
taxonomy systematics biodiversity species natural history scientific collections science policy conservation collaboration


I believe the top three questions facing taxonomy today all relate to the health and future of the discipline itself. 1. How do we ensure taxonomy is valued? 2. How do we build and maintain taxonomic capability? 3. How do we ensure taxonomy benefits from emerging opportunities?



  1. Anon. (2016) Review of Crown Research Institute Core Funding. New Zealand Ministry for Business, Innovation, and Employment, Wellington, 46 pp.

    Boxshall, G. & Self, D. (2011) UK Taxonomy & Systematics Review – 2010. Natural Environment Research Council, London, 37 pp.

    de Carvalho, M.R., Ebach, M.C., Williams, D.M., Nihei, S.S., Rodrigues, M.T., Grant, T., Silveira, L.F., Zaher, H., Gill, A.C., Schelly, R.C., Sparks, J.S., Bockmann, F.A., Séret, B., Ho, H.-C., Grande, L., Rieppel, O., Dubois, A., Ohler, A., Faivovich, J., Assis, L.C.S., Wheeler, Q.D., Goldstein, P.Z., Almeida, E.A.B. de, Valdecasas, A.G. & Nelson, G. (2014) Does counting species count as taxonomy? On misrepresenting systematics, yet again. Cladistics, 30, 322–329.

    Clark, B.R., Godfray, H.C.J., Kitching, I.J., Mayo, S.J. & Scoble, M.J. (2009) Taxonomy as an eScience. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 367, 953–966.

    Coleman, C.O. (2015) Taxonomy in Times of the Taxonomic Impediment – Examples from the Community of Experts on Amphipod Crustaceans. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 35, 729–740.

    Ebach, M.C., Valdecasas, A.G. & Wheeler, Q.D. (2011) Impediments to taxonomy and users of taxonomy: Accessibility and impact evaluation. Cladistics, 27, 550–557.

    Hamilton, A. & Wheeler, Q.D. (2008) Taxonomy and Why History of Science Matters for Science. Isis, 99, 331–340.

    Hennig, W. (1966) Phylogenetic Systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, 280 pp.

    Hoebeke, E.R. & Carter, M.E. (2003) Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae): A polyphagous plant pest from Asia newly detected in North America. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 105, 225–237.

    House of Lords (2008) Systematics and Taxonomy: Follow-up. House of Lords Science & Technology Committee, London, 386 pp.

    Iglésias, S.P., Toulhoat, L. & Sellos, D.Y. (2010) Taxonomic confusion and market mislabelling of threatened skates: important consequences for their conservation status. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 20, 319–333.

    Nelson, W., Brietweiser, I., Fordyce, E., Bradford-Grieve, B., Penman, D., Roskruge, N., Trnski, T., Waugh, S. & Webb, C. (2015) National Taxonomic Collections in New Zealand. Royal Society of New Zealand, Wellington, 68 pp.

    Sluys, R. (2013) The unappreciated, fundamentally analytical nature of taxonomy and the implications for the inventory of biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22, 1095–1105.

    Wheeler, Q. (2010) What would NASA do? Mission-critical infrastructure for species exploration. Systematics and Biodiversity 8, 11–15.

    Wheeler, Q. (2018) Blank canvas: The case for descriptive taxonomy. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 58, 1118–1121.

    Wheeler, Q., Bourgoin, T., Coddington, J., Gostony, T., Hamilton, A., Larimer, R., Polaszek, A., Schauff, M. & Solis, A. (2012) Nomenclatural benchmarking: the roles of digital typification and telemicroscopy. ZooKeys, 209, 193–202.

    Wheeler, Q.D. (2005) Losing the plot: DNA “barcodes” and taxonomy. Cladistics, 21, 405–407.

    Wheeler, Q.D. (2009) Revolutionary thoughts on taxonomy: declarations of independence and interdependence. Zoologia (Curitiba), 26, 1–4.

    Will, K.W., Mishler, B.D. & Wheeler, Q.D. (2005) The perils of DNA barcoding and the need for integrative taxonomy. Systematic Biology, 54, 844–851.