Bionomina https://www.mapress.com/bn <p><strong>Bionomina</strong> is an international journal of biological nomenclature and terminology.</p> Magnolia Press en-US Bionomina 1179-7649 <strong>Historical literature suggests a Sri Lankan origin for the etymology of the snake generic names <em>Duberria</em> Fitzinger, 1826 and <em>Malpolon</em> Fitzinger, 1826 (Reptilia, Serpentes)</strong> https://www.mapress.com/bn/article/view/bionomina.43.3.1 <p lang="en-US" align="justify"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-GB">The snake genera </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>Duberria</em></span><span lang="en-GB"> and </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>Malpolon</em></span><span lang="en-GB">, both established by Leopold Fitzinger in the 19</span><sup><span lang="en-GB">th</span></sup><span lang="en-GB"> century, have long presented uncertainties regarding their etymological origins. Herein, I discuss the possibility that these generic names were sourced from historical literature dating back to the 17</span><sup><span lang="en-GB">th</span></sup><span lang="en-GB"> century and were derived from the Sinhala language, indicating a potential Sri Lankan origin. Additionally, I review the taxonomic and nomenclatural status of the names as presented in those earlier works, highlighting linguistic discrepancies, relevant remarks, and their standing under the current </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>International Code of Zoological Nomenclature</em></span><span lang="en-GB">. A type species for the genus </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>Duberria</em></span><span lang="en-GB"> is here validly designated for the first time.</span></span></span></span></p> SANJAYA K. BANDARA Copyright (c) 2025 2025-12-22 2025-12-22 43 3 34 44 10.11646/bionomina.43.3.1 <strong>Protection of the nomen <em>Gehyra oceanica</em> (Lesson, 1830) (Squamata) by the application of Article 23.9.1 of the <em>Code</em></strong> https://www.mapress.com/bn/article/view/bionomina.43.3.2 <p lang="en-US" align="justify"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-GB"><em>Gehyra oceanica</em></span><span lang="en-GB"> (Lesson, 1830) is the universally employed nomen for a gekkonid gecko from the islands of the tropical Pacific Ocean. It is threatened by an older subjective synonym, </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>Stellio argyropus</em></span><span lang="en-GB"> Tilesio, 1820, based on a specimen described and figured from Nuku Hiva in the Marquesas Islands. Although the priority of the latter name has been recognized for more than 30 years, it has neither been treated as a valid nomen nor been demonstrated to be a </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>nomen oblitum.</em></span><span lang="en-GB"> The requirements of Articles 23.9.1 and 23.9.2 of the </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>International Code of Zoological Nomenclature</em></span><span lang="en-GB"> are here satisfied. Therefore, </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>S. argyropus</em></span><span lang="en-GB"> is demonstrated to be a </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>nomen oblitum</em></span><span lang="en-GB"> and </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>Gecko oceanicus</em></span><span lang="en-GB"> Lesson, 1830 is declared a </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>nomen protectum</em></span><span lang="en-GB">.</span></span></span></span></p> AARON M. BAUER Copyright (c) 2025 2025-12-22 2025-12-22 43 3 45 53 10.11646/bionomina.43.3.2 <strong><em>Aotus jorgehernandezi</em> Defler & Bueno, 2007, a synonym of <em>Aotus brumbacki </em>Hershkovitz, 1983 (Mammalia, Primates)</strong> https://www.mapress.com/bn/article/view/bionomina.43.3.3 <p lang="en-US" align="justify"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-GB">The binomen </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>Aotus jorgehernandezi</em></span><span lang="en-GB"> Defler &amp; Bueno, 2007 was erected for a species of night monkey diagnosed on the basis of karyomorphic differences. The type locality of </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>A. jorgehernandezi</em></span><span lang="en-GB"> is unknown, as the original description was based on a single specimen found in captivity in the Andean region of Colombia but presumed to be native to Los Nevados National Natural Park, located on the border between the departments of Quindío and Risaralda, in the Central Cordillera of Colombia. Since the description of this species, the binomen has been controversial as the holotype is lost, and as no additional specimens referred to this species are yet known. Here, we evaluate the nomenclatural validity of </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>A. jorgehernandezi</em></span><span lang="en-GB"> and the taxonomic traits used for its description, comparing it to other </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>Aotus</em></span><span lang="en-GB"> species from Colombia. Although the binomen </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>A. jorgehernandezi</em></span><span lang="en-GB"> is nomenclaturally available, taxonomic traits including the karyotype information strongly suggest that it is a junior synonym of </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>A. brumbacki</em></span><span lang="en-GB"> Hershkovitz, 1983, which has a cis-Andean distribution in Colombia.</span></span></span></span></p> SEBASTIÁN O. MONTILLA SEBASTIÁN GARCÍA-RESTREPO ALAIN DUBOIS ANDRÉS LINK HÉCTOR E. RAMÍREZ-CHAVES Copyright (c) 2025 2025-12-22 2025-12-22 43 3 54 77 10.11646/bionomina.43.3.3 <strong>The “Kaiserian shortfall”, fishes, and the regulation of taxonomy by the <em>Code</em></strong> https://www.mapress.com/bn/article/view/bionomina.43.3.4 <p lang="en-US" align="justify"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-GB">Since 2013, there has been a heated debate over bad practices in zoological nomenclature and taxonomy (which have been called ‘taxonomic vandalism’) and what to do about them. Mostly, the critics have been calling ‘vandals’ those who propose new names based on the appropriation of results generated by other researchers. Some herpetologists have suggested establishing new ‘aspidonyms’ to replace nomina proposed in such circumstances, thus ignoring Article 23 of the </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>Code</em></span><span lang="en-GB">, which establishes the principle of priority in zoological nomenclature. In turn, the Commission has decided against their request to suppress names proposed by ‘taxonomic vandals’, so the problem remains unsolved. Even though plagiarism and other similar, unethical behaviours are deplorable, I call attention to another phenomenon that is detrimental to nomenclature, i.e., the proposition of new nomina whose application is dubious due to poorly constructed diagnoses and other shortcomings that are mainly a result of insufficient peer review. Since the beginning of the 21</span><sup><span lang="en-GB">st</span></sup><span lang="en-GB"> century, dozens of Neotropical fish species have been described in substandard works. The fact that a proportion of the taxa that have been named lacks a workable diagnosis, while many of their names were proposed in unscientific or unethical circumstances and are rejected by those adhering to scientific principles, is herein referred to as ‘Kaiserian shortfall’ in honour of the herpetologist that has been leading the struggle against taxonomic vandalism. My approach to fighting against the Kaiserian shortfall includes changes to the </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>Code</em></span><span lang="en-GB">, which in my view should regulate taxonomy as well as nomenclature. I suggest that: [1] only online papers be regarded as published work, observing Article 8.5; [2] only journals included in a list compiled by a consortium of scientific societies and approved by the Commission be suitable for the publication of nomenclatural acts; [3] a published work, in the sense of the </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>Code</em></span><span lang="en-GB">, must include an exhaustive diagnosis for each taxon described or redescribed; and [4] only works issued in English can be regarded as published.</span></span></span></span></p> GABRIEL DE CARVALHO DEPRÁ Copyright (c) 2025 2025-12-22 2025-12-22 43 3 78 91 10.11646/bionomina.43.3.4 <strong>Etymology of nomina and bibliography of reptiles of the Scattered Islands (Indian Ocean)</strong> https://www.mapress.com/bn/article/view/bionomina.43.3.5 <p lang="en-US" align="justify"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-GB">We provide a catalogue of 12 generic nomina and 19 species or subspecies epithets of reptiles of the Scattered Islands (Îles Éparses in French) in the Indian Ocean, with some nomenclatural consequences that result from our observations, especially for</span> <span lang="en-GB">"</span><span lang="en-GB"><em>Flexiceps</em></span><span lang="en-GB">"</span> <span lang="en-GB">(not validly published) and </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>Furcifer pollenii</em></span><span lang="en-GB"> (misspelled). In order to solve some nomenclatural problems, we had to resort to 11 Articles of the </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>Code</em></span><span lang="en-GB"> (8.5‒6, 11.8, 28, 30.1‒3, 30.1.4.2, 30.2.3‒4, 33.4) and to 37 technical nomenclatural terms. Once again, this highlights the fact that nomenclatural problems concerning ancient nomina cannot be properly dealt with in a hurry and without a good, but also critical, knowledge of the </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>Code</em></span><span lang="en-GB">, and that the use of a more detailed terminology than that of the </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>Code</em></span><span lang="en-GB"> facilitates such a work. Finally, to prepare this paper we began by compiling a bibliography as exhautive as possible. This bibliographical list is presented in Appendix 1.</span></span></span></span></p> THIERRY FRÉTEY Copyright (c) 2025 2025-12-22 2025-12-22 43 3 92 110 10.11646/bionomina.43.3.5