Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 27 No. 1: 19 July 2022
Type: Article
Published: 2022-07-19
DOI: 10.11646/bionomina.27.1.4
Page range: 67–87
Abstract views: 401
PDF downloaded: 6

On the authorship of Canthon rutilans cyanescens ‘Harold, 1868’ (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Scarabaeinae, Deltochilini): the treatment of varieties and nomina nuda by a 19th-century zoologist

Laboratório de Sistemática e Bioecologia de Coleoptera, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Centro Politécnico, Jardim das Américas, 81.531-980, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
Laboratório de Taxonomia e Ecologia de Insetos, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Av. Prof. Moraes Rego, s/n, Cidade Universitária, 50670-420, Recife, PE, Brazil
Departamento de Biologia e Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso. Av. Fernando Correa da Costa, 2367, Boa Esperança, 78060-900, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil
Adolf Schmidt Pierre François Marie Auguste Dejean Edgar von Harold nomen nudum subspecies variety zoological nomenclature

Abstract

Ever since Schmidt’s (1922) review of Canthon, the authorship of the species-group name Canthon rutilans cyanescens (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) has been almost unanimously attributed to Harold (1868). Here, we argue that this is mistaken. This species-group name first entered the literature as a nomen nudum in Lacordaire’s 1830 memoirs of his South American beetle explorations, and there its authorship was credited to Dejean. Later, it was listed in Harold’s (1868) Canthon revision as an unavailable name referring to what he considered to be a blue variety of Canthon rutilans Castelnau, 1840. In keeping with his usual nomenclatural treatment of nomina nuda as unavailable and with his procedure of not naming infraspecific taxa, Harold did not consider ‘cyanescens Dejean’ as the valid name of that ‘blue variety’ of C. rutilans. His citation, therefore, does not make the name available by not complying with Article 11.5 of the Code. The first author to fulfil all the availability requirements of the Code was Schmidt (1922), who both treated the name as valid for a taxon and accompanied it with an indication—more specifically, an indication to Harold’s description of the blue variety of C. rutilans. It is to Schmidt (1922) that the authorship of cyanescens must, thereby, be credited. One of the specimens used by Harold to produce the description indicated by Schmidt was found by us in the Paris Museum and it is here designated as the lectotype of Canthon rutilans cyanescens.

References

  1. Anonymous (1834) J. Th. Lacordaire, über die Lebensweise der Käfer im mittäglichen America. Diele Käfer namentlich angeführt. Isis von Oken, 11: 1112‒1127. [The authorship of this review most likely belongs to Lorenz Oken (1779‒1851), the founder and editor of the journal. See Kertesz (1986) for a history of this journal].

  2. Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1999) International code of zoological nomenclature. ‘Fourth edition’. London (International Trust for zoological Nomenclature): i–xxix +1–306.

  3. Amadon, D. (1966) The superspecies concept. Systematic Zoology, 15 (3): 245–249. <https://doi.org/10.2307/2411398>.

  4. Balthasar, V. (1939) Eine Vorstudie zur Monographie der Gattung Canthon Hffsg. Folia zoologica et hydrobiologica, 9 (2): 179–238.

  5. Bernardi, G. (1980) Les catégories taxonomiques de la systématique évolutive. Mémoire de la Société zoologique de France, 40 (3): 373‒425.

  6. Bett, J. Z., Farias, P. M. de, Silva, P. G. da & Hernández, M. I. M. (2014) Dung beetle communities in coal mining areas in the process of recovery. Biotemas, 27 (3): 197‒200. <https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7925.2014v27n3p197>.

  7. Blackwelder, R. E. (1944) Checklist of the coleopterous insects of Mexico, Central America, the West Indies, and South America. Part 2. United States national Museum Bulletin, 185: 189–341. <https://doi.org/10.5479/si.03629236.185.2>.

  8. Blanchard, É. (1846) [Livraison 79]. In: É. Blanchard & G. A. Brullé (1835–1847), Voyage dans l’Amérique méridionale (le Brésil, la République orientale de l’Uruguay, la République argentine, la Patagonie, la République du Chili, la République de Bolivia, la République du Pérou), exécuté pendant les années 1826, 1827, 1828, 1829, 1830, 1831, 1832 et 1833, par Alcide d’Orbigny, Tome sixième, 2e partie: Insectes, Paris (P. Bertrand) and Strasbourg (Ve. Lerrault): 153–168. [Publication date follows Evenhuis (1997b: 573) and Sherborn & Woodward (1901: 389), who based their dating on the record of the concerned livraison in the 1846 edition of Wiegmann’s Archiv für Naturgeschichte. It is noteworthy, however, that Bousquet (2016: 77) dated this livraison 1845 following the information stated on its wrapper, which Evenhuis (1997a: 12) argued was not a reliable source].

  9. Bogoni, J. A., & Hernández, M. I. M. (2014) Attractiveness of native mammal’s feces of different trophic guilds to dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae). Journal of Insect Science, 14 (1): 1‒7. <https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieu161>.

  10. Boucomont, A. (1928) Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der schwedischen entomologischen Reise des Herrn Dr. A. Roman in Amazonas 1914–1915 (und 1923–1924). 12. Scarabaeidae. Arkiv för Zoologi, 19A (22): 1–8. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.1064>.

  11. Bowler, P. J. (1983) The eclipse of Darwinism. Anti-Darwinian evolution theories in the decade around 1900. Baltimore & London (The John Hopkins University Press): [i]‒ix + [1]‒291.

  12. Braby, M. F., Eastwood, R. & Murray, N. (2012) The subspecies concept in butterflies: has its application in taxonomy and conservation biology outlived its usefulness? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 106 (4): 699–716. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2012.01909.x>.

  13. Browne, J. (1980) Darwin’s botanical arithmetic and the ‘Principle of Divergence’, 1854‒1858. Journal of the History of Biology, 13 (1): 53‒89. <https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125354>.

  14. Bruch, C. (1911) Catálogo sistemático de los Coleópteros de la República Argentina. Revista del Museo de la Plata, 17: 143‒225. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.8799>.

  15. Burmeister, H. (1874) Lamellicornia argentina [Fortsetzung]. Entomologische Zeitung Stettin, 35: 120–133.

  16. Campos, R. C. & Hernández, M. I. M. (2015a) Changes in the dynamics of functional groups in communities of dung beetles in Atlantic Forest fragments adjacent to transgenic maize crops. Ecological Indicators, 49: 216‒227. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.043>.

  17. Campos, R. C. & Hernández, M. I. M. (2015b) The importance of maize management on dung beetle communities in Atlantic Forest fragments. PLoS One, 10 (12): 1‒15. <https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145000>.

  18. Cassenote, S., Silva, P. G. da, Di Mare, R. A. & Paladini, A. (2019) Seasonality of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) in Atlantic Forest sites with different levels of disturbance in southern Brazil. Iheringia, (Zoologia), 109 [e2019035]: 1‒9. <https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019035>.

  19. Castelnau, Comte de (1840) Histoire naturelle des animaux Articulés, Annélides, Crustacés, Arachnides, Myriapodes et Insectes. Histoire naturelle des Insectes Coléoptères. Tome deuxième. Paris (Duménil): [1]‒563 + [1], 1‒38 pl. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.47104>.

  20. Costa-Silva, V., Cipolatto, R. P., Abegg, A. D., Rosa, C. M. da, Silva, P. G. & Di Mare, R. A. (2014) Escarabeídeos (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) de campo e floresta da Reserva Biológica de São Donato, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Biotemas, 27 (4): 63‒71. <https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7925.2014v27n4p63>.

  21. Cupello, M. (2020) The discovery of Edgar von Harold type material in the Museum of Zoology, Dresden. Scarabaeus, 1: 15–24.

  22. Cupello, M. (2021) Addenda and corrigenda to The discovery of Edgar von Harold type material in the Museum of Zoology, Dresden. Scarabaeus, 2: 18–25.

  23. Cupello, M., Ribeiro-Costa, C. S. & Vaz-de-Mello, F. Z. (2021) The evolution of Bolbites onitoides (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Phanaeini): its phylogenetic significance, geographical polychromatism and the subspecies problem. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, online edition: 1‒62. <https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab015>.

  24. Cupello, M. & Vaz-de-Mello, F. Z. (2013) Taxonomic revision of the South American dung beetle genus Gromphas Brullé, 1837 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Phanaeini: Gromphadina). Zootaxa, 3722 (4): 439–482. <https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3722.4.2>.

  25. Cupello M. & Vaz-de-Mello F. Z. (2018) A monographic revision of the Neotropical dung beetle genus Sylvicanthon Halffter & Martínez, 1977 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Deltochilini), with a reappraisal of the taxonomic history of ‘Canthon sensu lato’. European Journal of Taxonomy, 467: 1‒205. <https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2018.467>.

  26. Darwin, C. (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London (John Murray): i‒x + 1‒502 + 1‒32. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.82303>.

  27. De Vries, H. (1903) Die Mutationstheorie. Versuche und Beobachtungen über die Entstehung von Arten im Pflanzenreich. Zweiter Band. Elementare Bastardlehre. Mit zahlreichen Abbildungen und vier farbigen Tafeln. Leipzig (Verlag von Veit & Comp.): i‒xiv + 1‒752, 4 pl.

  28. De Vries, H. (1905) Species and varieties. Their origin by mutation. Chicago (The Open Court Publishing Company) & London (Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co.): i‒xviii + 1‒847.

  29. De Vries, H. (1910) The mutation theory. Experiments and observations on the origin of species in the vegetable kingdom. Volume 2. The origin of varieties by mutation. Chicago, Illinois (The Open Court Publishing Company): i‒viii + 1‒683.

  30. Dejean, P. F. M .A. (1833) [Livraison 2, 97–176]. In: P. F. M. A. Dejean (1833–1836), Catalogue des Coléoptères de la collection de M. le Comte Dejean, Paris (Méquignon-Marvis Père et Fils): [1]‒443. [Publication date according to Madge (1988)]. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.8771>.

  31. Dejean, P. F. M. A. (1836) [Livraisons 1–4, 1–384]. In: P. F. M. A. Dejean (1836–1837), Catalogue des Coléoptères de la collection de M. le Comte Dejean, Troisième édition, revue, corrigée et augmentée, Paris (Méquignon-Marvis Père et Fils): [i]–xiv + 1‒503. [Publication date according to Madge (1988)]. <https://doi.org/10.5962/t.173109>.

  32. Drès, M. & Mallet J. (2002) Host races in plant-feeding insects and their importance in sympatric speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the royal Society, (B), 357 (1420): 471–492. <https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1059>.

  33. Dubois, A., Ohler, A. & Pyron, A. (2021) New concepts and methods for phylogenetic taxonomy and nomenclature in zoology, exemplified by a new ranked cladonomy of recent amphibians (Lissamphibia). Megataxa, 5 (1): 1‒738. <https://doi.org/10.11646/megataxa.5.1.1>.

  34. Ereshefsky, M. (2001) The poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy. A philosophical study of biological taxonomy. Cambridge (Cambridge University Press): i‒x + 1‒316. <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498459>.

  35. Ereshefsky, M. (2010) Darwin’s solution to the species problem. Synthese, 175: 405‒425. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9538-4>.

  36. Evenhuis, N. L. (1997a) Litteratura taxonomica dipterorum (1758–1930). Vol. 1. A–K. Leiden (Backhuys): 1‒426.

  37. Evenhuis, N. L. (1997b) Litteratura taxonomica dipterorum (1758–1930). Vol. 2. L–Z. Leiden (Backhuys): 1‒445 [427–871].

  38. Germar, E. F. [signed as the ‘Herausgeber’] (1813) Neue insekten. Magazin der Entomologie, 1: 114–133.

  39. Ghiselin, M. T. (1969) The triumph of the Darwinian method. Berkeley, California (University of California Press): 1‒287.

  40. Giebel, G. (1865) Verzeichniss von Insekten. Halle (anonymous editor): 1‒12.

  41. Gillet, J. J. E. (1911) Coleopterorum catalogus. Pars 38. Scarabaeidae: Coprinae I. Berlin (W. Junk): [3]‒100.

  42. Gould, S. J. (2002) The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts, & London (The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press): [i]‒xxii + 1‒1433.

  43. Grant, V. (1981) Plant speciation. Second edition. New York (Columbia University Press): [i]‒xii + [1]‒563. <https://doi.org/10.7312/gran92318>.

  44. Haffer, J. (1986) Superspecies and species limits in vertebrates. Zeitschrift für zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung, 24 (3): 169‒190. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0469.1986.tb00626.x>.

  45. Halffter, G. & Martínez, A. (1977) Revisión monográfica de los Canthonina americanos, IV parte. Clave para géneros y subgéneros. Folia entomológica mexicana, 38: 29–107.

  46. Harold, E. (1863) Note sur les espèces mexicaines du genre Phanaeus et descriptions de quelques espèces nouvelles de Coléoptères mexicaines. Annales de la Société entomologique de France, 4 (3):161–176. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00379271.1863.11755442>.

  47. Harold, E. [signed as the ‘Herausgeber’] (1867) Diagnosen neuer Coprophagen. Coleopterologische Hefte, 1: 76–83.

  48. Harold, E. (1868a) Monographie der Gattung Canthon. Berliner entomologische Zeitschrift, 12: 1–144. <https://doi.org/10.1002/mmnd.18680120105>.

  49. Harold, E. [signed as the ‘Herausgeber’] (1868b) Diagnosen neuer Coprophagen. Coleopterologische Hefte, 4: 79–86.

  50. Harold, E. (1869) Catalogus coleopterorum. Hucusque descriptorum, synonymicus et systematicus. Tomus 4. Scarabaeidae. Munich (E. H. Gummi): 979–1346.

  51. Hensen, M. C., Hernández, M. I. M., Silva, P. G. da, Amore, V. & Lobo, J. M. (2018) Distribution of Canthon rutilans rutilans and Canthon rutilans cyanescens along spatio-temporal and temperature gradients. Insects, 9 (124): 1‒10. <https://doi.org/10.3390/insects9040124>.

  52. Hensen, M. C., Lobo, J. M. & Hernández, M. I. M. (2020) Differences in the reproductive behaviour and larval development of two Canthon rutilans subspecies reinforce their thermal regional segregation. Entomologia experimentalis et applicata, online edition: [1‒23].

  53. Hernández, M. I. M., Niero, M. M., Schumacher, F. & Wuerges, M. (2020) Feeding and reproductive behavior of the dung beetle Canthon rutilans cyanescens (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Revista brasileira de Entomologia, 64 (2) [e20190007]: 1‒10. <https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9665-rbent-2019-0007>.

  54. Hoffmannsegg, J. C., Grafen von (1817) Entomologische Bemerkungen bei Gelegenheit der Abhandlungen über amerikanische Insecten, in der vierten bis sechsten Lieferung von den Recueils d’Observations de Zoologie et d’Anatomie Comparée, oder dem 2ten Theile der Reise, der Herren Al. v. Humboldt und A. Bonpland, nemlich: No. IX. in Livr. 4. p. 197–283, und No. XI. XII. in Livr. 5. 6. p. 294–397. Zoologisches Magazin, 1 (1): 8–56.

  55. Huxley, J. (1940) Towards the new systematics. In: J. Huxley, (ed.), The new systematics, Oxford (Oxford University Press): [1]‒46.

  56. Kertesz, G. A. (1986) Notes on Isis von Oken, 1817‒1848. Isis, 77 (3): 497‒503. <https://doi.org/10.1086/354208>.

  57. Kitchener, A. C., Breitenmoser-Würsten, C., Eizirik, E., Gentry, A., Werdelin, L., Wilting, A., Yamaguchi, N., Abramov, A. V., Christiansen, P., Driscoll, C., Duckworth, J. W., Johnson, W., Luo, S.-J., Meijaard, E., O’Donoghue, P., Sanderson, J., Seymour, K., Bruford, M., Groves, C., Hoffmann, M., Nowell, K., Timmons, Z. & Tobe, S. (2017) A revised taxonomy of the Felidae. The final report of the Cat Classification Task Force of the IUCN/SSC Cat Specialist Group. Cat News Special Issue, 11: 1–80.

  58. Korasaki, V., Lopes, J., Brown, G. G. & Louzada, J. (2012) Using dung beetles to evaluate the effects of urbanization on Atlantic Forest biodiversity. Insect Science, 20 (3): 393‒406. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7917.2012.01509.x>.

  59. Kraus, R. H. S., Kerstens, H. H. D., Hooft, P. van, Megens, H.-J., Elmberg, J., Tsvey, A., Sartakov, D., Soloviev, S. A., Crooijmans, R. P. M. A., Groenen, M. A. M., Ydenberg, R. C. & Prins, H. H. T. (2012) Widespread horizontal genomic exchange does not erode species barriers among sympatric ducks. BMC evolutionary Biology, 12 (45): 1‒10. <https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-12-45>.

  60. Lacordaire, J. T. (1830) Mémoire sur les habitudes des Insectes Coléoptères de l’Amérique méridionale. Annales des Sciences naturelles, 20: 185–291.

  61. Lange, R. B. (1947) Ensaio da zoogeografia dos Scarabaeidae do Paraná com algumas notas eto-ecológicas. Arquivos do Museu Paranaense, 6: 305‒315.

  62. Latreille, P. A. (1807) Insectes de l’Amérique équinoxiale, recueillis pendant le voyage de MM. de Humboldt et Bonpland. In: A. Humboldt, & A.Bonpland, (1805–1810), Recueil d’observations de zoologie et d’anatomie comparée, faites dans l’océan Atlantique, dans l’intérieur du nouveau continent et dans la mer du Sud pendant les années 1799, 1800, 1801, 1802 et 1803, Premier volume, Paris (Schoell & Dufour), [livraison 3]: 105–196. [Publication date according to Bousquet (2016)].

  63. Latreille, P. A. (1829) Le règne animal distribué d’après son organisation, pour servir de base à l’histoire naturelle des animaux et d’introduction à l’anatomie comparée. Avec figures dessinées d’après nature. Nouvelle édition, revue et augmentée. Tome 4. Crustacés, Arachnides et partie des Insectes. Paris (Déterville & Crochard): i‒xxvii + 1‒584.

  64. Le Conte, J. L. (1847) Fragmenta entomologica. Journal of the Academy of natural Sciences of Philadelphia, (second series), 2 (1): 71‒93.

  65. Lorković, Z. (1953a) Spezifische, semispezifische und rassische Differenzierung bei Erebia tyndarus Esp. I. Travaux de l’Institut de Biologie expérimentale de l’Académie de Yougoslavie, 11: 269‒309.

  66. Lorković, Z. (1953b) Spezifische, semispezifische und rassische Differenzierung bei Erebia tyndarus Esp. II. Travaux de l’Institut de Biologie expérimentale de l’Académie de Yougoslavie, 12: 193‒224.

  67. Lorković, Z. (1955) Potreba uvođenja kategorije semispecijes u sistematiku. Periodicum Biologorum, 7: 234‒235.

  68. Lorković, Z. & Kiriakoff, S. G. (1958) Case No. 58. Proposed insertion in the ‘Règles’ of provisions recognising ‘semispecies’ as a special category for the classification and nomenclature of definite groups of taxa as now proposed to be defined. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 15 (B): 1031‒1033.

  69. Lucas, P. H. (1859) Animaux nouveaux ou rares recueillis pendant l’expédition dans les parties centrales de l’Amérique du Sud, de Rio de Janeiro à Lima, et de Lima au Para; exécutée par ordre du Gouvernement Français pendant les années 1843 à 1847, sous la direction du Comte Francis de Castelnau. Paris (P. Bertrand): 1‒204, 20 pl. [The publication date of this book is disputed between either 1857 or 1859. See Bousquet’s (2016) discussion]

  70. Madge, R. B. (1988) The publication dates of Dejean’s catalogues. Archives of natural History, 15 (3): 317–321. <https://doi.org/10.3366/anh.1988.15.3.317>.

  71. Mallet, J. (2001) Subspecies, semispecies, superspecies. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, on-line edition: 1–5. <https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-226865-2/00261-3>.

  72. Mallet, J. (2008) Hybridization, ecological races and the nature of species: empirical evidence for the ease of speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the royal Society, (B), 363: 2971‒2986. <https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0081>.

  73. Mayr, E. (1940) Speciation phenomena in birds. The American Naturalist, 74 (752): 249–278. <https://doi.org/10.1086/280892>.

  74. Mayr, E. (1942) Systematics and the origin of species from the viewpoint of a zoologist. New York (Columbia University Press): 1‒334.

  75. Mayr, E. (1948) The bearing of the New Systematics on genetical problems: the nature of species. Advances in Genetics, 2: 205‒237. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60469-1>.

  76. Mayr, E. (1963) Animal species and evolution. Cambridge, Massachusetts (The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press): i‒xvi + 1‒797. <https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674865327>.

  77. Mayr, E. (1969) Principles of systematic zoology. New York (McGraw-Hill): i‒xi + 1‒428.

  78. Mayr, E. (1978) Origin and history of some terms in systematic and evolutionary biology. Systematic Zoology, 27 (7): 83‒88. <https://doi.org/10.2307/2412818>.

  79. Mayr, E. (1982) The growth of biological thought. Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge, Massachusetts (The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press): [i‒xv] + 1‒974.

  80. Mayr, E. (1992) Darwin’s Principle of Divergence. Journal of the History of Biology, 25 (3): 343‒359. <https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00351996>.

  81. Mayr, E. & Diamond, J. (2001) The birds of northern Melanesia: speciation, ecology, and biogeography. New York (Oxford University Press): i‒xxiv + 1‒492, pl. 1‒9.

  82. Medina, A. M. & Campos, E. M. (2013) Remarks about biology of Canthon rutilans Laporte, 1840 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) with the first report of perching in a Brazilian tropical dry forest. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 73 (2): 447‒448. <https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842013000200029>.

  83. Meulendijks, M. (2021) Eclipsing the Eclipse? A Neo-Darwinian historiography revisited. Journal of the History of Biology, 54: 403‒443. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-021-09650-9>.

  84. Müller-Wille, S. (2015) Linnaeus and the four corners of the world. In: K. A. Coles, R. Bauer, Z. Nunes & C. L. Peterson (ed.), The cultural politics of blood, 1500‒1900, London (Palgrave Macmillan): 191‒209. <https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137338211_10>.

  85. Papavero, N. (1971) Essays on the history of neotropical dipterology, with special reference to collectors (1750–1905). Volume 1. São Paulo (Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo): i‒vii + 1‒216. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.101715>.

  86. Pereira, F. S. & Martínez, A. (1959) Tres nuevos géneros de ‘Canthonini’ americanos (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Acta zoológica lilloana, 17: 164–184.

  87. Reiche, [L. J.] (1841) Tableau d’une division systématique de la tribu des Coprophages, dans la famille des Lamellicornes. Revue et Magazine de Zoologie, pure et appliquée, 4: 211–213.

  88. Rensch, B. (1933) Zoologische Systematik und Artbildungsproblem. Verhandlungen der Deutschen zoologischen Gesellschaft, 6 (supplement): 19–83.

  89. Robertson, J. G. (1961) Ovariole numbers in Coleoptera. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 39: 245‒263. <https://doi.org/10.1139/z61-028>.

  90. Schilder, F.A. (1962) Das geographische Prinzip in der Taxonomie. XI International Kongress für Entomologie, 3: 329‒333.

  91. Schmidt, A. (1920) Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Gattungen Canthon Hffsg., Sybax Boh., Aphodius Ill., Simogenius Har., Ataenius Har. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, (Abteilung A), 86 (9): 114–147.

  92. Schmidt, A. (1922) 1. Bestimmungstabelle der mir bekannten Canthon-Arten. 2. Verbreitungsgebiete der Canthon-Arten. 3. Neubeschreibungen von Canthon, Saprositis, Mendidius, Euparia und Ataenius. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, (Abteilung A), 88 (3): 61–103.

  93. Sherborn, C. D. & Woodward, B. B. (1901) Notes on the dates of publication of the natural history portions of some French voyages. Part I. ‘Amérique méridionale’; ‘Indes orientales’; ‘Pôle Sud’ (‘Astrolabe’ and ‘Zélée’); ‘La Bonite’; ‘La Coquille’; and ‘L’Uranie et Physicienne’. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, including Zoology, Botany and Geology, (7), 7: 388‒392.

  94. Silva, P. G., da (2011) Dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) of two non-native habitats in Bagé, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Zoological Studies, 50 (5): 546‒559.

  95. Silva, P. G., da (2017) Dung beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabaeinae) from high-altitude grasslands in São Joaquim National Park, Santa Catarina, southern Brazil. Check List, 13 (6): 817‒830. <https://doi.org/10.15560/13.6.817>.

  96. Silva, P. G., da & Hernández, M. I. M. (2014) Local and regional effects on community structure of dung beetles in a mainland-island scenario. PLoS One, 9 (10): 1‒12. <https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111883>.

  97. Silva, P. G., da & Hernández, M. I. M. (2015a) Spatial patterns of movement of dung beetle species in a tropical forest suggest a new trap spacing for dung beetle biodiversity studies. PLoS One, 10 (5): 1‒18. <https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126112>.

  98. Silva, P. G., da & Hernández, M. I. M. (2015b) Scale-dependence of processes structuring dung beetle metacommunities using functional diversity and community deconstruction approaches. PLoS One, 10 (3): 1‒29. <https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123030>.

  99. Silva, P. G., da & Hernández, M. I. M. (2016) Spatial variation of dung beetle assemblages associated with forest structure in remnants of southern Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Revista brasileira de Entomologia, 60: 73‒81. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbe.2015.11.001>.

  100. Sneath, P. H. A. (1962) The construction of taxonomic groups. In: G. C. Ainsworth & P. H. A. Sneath (ed.) Microbial classification, Twelfth Symposium of the Society for General Microbiology, Cambridge (Cambridge University Press): 289‒332.

  101. Stamhuis, I. H., Meijer, O. G. & Zevenhuizen, E. J. A. (1999) Hugo de Vries on heredity, 1889‒1903. Statistics, Mendelian laws, pangenes, mutations. Isis, 90: 238‒267. <https://doi.org/10.1086/384323>.

  102. Stamos, D. (2005) Pre-Darwinian taxonomy and essentialism. A reply to Mary Winsor. Biology and Philosophy, 20: 79‒96. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-005-0401-9>.

  103. Stankowski, S. & Ravinet, M. (2021) Defining the speciation continuum. Evolution, 75 (6): 1256‒1273. <https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14215>.

  104. Strickland, H. E., Phillips, J., Richardson, J., Owen, R., Jenyns, L., Broderip, W. J., Henslow, J. S., Shuckard, W. E., Waterhouse, G. R., Yarrell, W., Darwin, C. & Westwood, J. O. (1842) Report of a Committee appointed ‘to consider of the rules by which the Nomenclature of Zoology may be established on a uniform and permanent basis’. London (John Murray, for the British Association for the Advancement of Science): 1‒17.

  105. Sturm, J. (1843) Catalog der Kaefer-Sammlung von Jacob Sturm. Nuremberg [Nürnberg] (anonymous editor): iii–xii + [1]‒386, pl. 1–6.

  106. Taylor, B. L., Archer, F. I., Martien, K. K., Rosei, P. E., Hancock-Hanser, B. L., Lang, A. R., Leslie, M. S., Mesnick, S. L., Morin, P. A., Pease, V. L., Perrin, W. F., Robertson, K. M., Parsons, K. M., Viricei, A., Vollmer, N. L., Cipriano, F., Reeves, R. R., Krützen, M. & Baker, C. S. (2017b) Guidelines and quantitative standards to improve consistency in cetacean subspecies and species delimitation relying on molecular genetic data. Marine Mammals Science, 33 (special issue): 132‒155. <https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12411>.

  107. Taylor, B. L., Perrin, W. F., Reeves, R. R., Rosei, P. E., Wang, J. Y., Cipriano, F., Baker, C. S., Brownell, R. L., Jr. (2017a) Why we should develop guidelines and quantitative standards for using genetic data to delimit subspecies for data-poor organisms like Cetaceans. Marine Mammals Science, 33 (special issue): 12‒26. <https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12413>.

  108. Travassos Filho, L. & Carrera, M. (1946) Segunda expedição científica a Pôrto Cabral, margem paulista do rio Paraná. Arquivos de Zoologia do Estado de São Paulo, 5: [89‒133].

  109. Valois, M., Vaz-de-Mello, F. Z. & Silva, F. A. B. (2015) A taxonomic review of the neotropical genus Hansreia Halffter & Martínez, 1977 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Zootaxa, 4027 (2): 205–226. <https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4027.2.2>.

  110. Vaz-de-Mello, F. Z. (2000) Estado atual de conhecimentos dos Scarabaeidae s. str. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) do Brasil. In: F. Martín-Piera, J. J. Morrone & A. Melic (ed.), Hacia un proyecto CYTED para el inventario y estimación de la diversidad entomológica en Iberoamérica: PRIBES-2000, m3m: Monografías Tercer Milenio, vol. 1, Zaragoza (Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa): 183–195.

  111. Vaz-de-Mello, F. Z. & Cupello, M. (2018) The type specimens of South American dung beetles. Part I. On the species described in the genus Canthon Hoffmannsegg, 1817 by the German entomologist Adolf Schmidt (1856–1923). Spixiana, 41 (1): 33–76.

  112. Vulcano, M. A. & Pereira, F. S. (1964) Catalogue of the Canthonini (Col. Scarab.) inhabiting the Western Hemisphere. Entomologischen Arbeiten aus dem Museum G. Frey, 15 (2): 570–685.

  113. Wilkins, J. S. (2009) Species. A history of the idea. Berkeley, Los Angeles & London (University of California Press): i‒xiv + 1‒305.

  114. Wu, C.-I. (2001) The genic view of the process of speciation. Journal of evolutionary Biology, 14 (6): 851–865. <https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00335.x>.

  115. Zachos, F. E. (2016) Species concepts in biology. Historical development, theoretical foundations and practical relevance. Springer: i‒xii +1‒220. <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44966-1>.