Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Article
Published: 2021-11-08
Page range: 38–50
Abstract views: 829
PDF downloaded: 10

It is high time that taxonomists follow the Code.
4. Amphibia of Indochina

Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité, ISYEB - UMR 7205 - CNRS, MNHN, UPMC, EPHE, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Université, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 30, F-75005, Paris, France
Taxonomy ergotaxonomy nomenclature validity invalidity priority synonymy homonymy onomatophores authorship date types stability arbitrariness


A recent checklist of the Amphibia of Indochina contains several nomenclatural errors that should be corrected before they spread: two species-series and two genus-series treated as valid in this work are invalid; the authorships and dates of several family-series and of all class-series nomina mentioned are wrong; the information provided about onomatophores (nomen-bearing specimens and nomina) are incomplete and for some of them inaccurate. Besides, the ergotaxonomy (classification) adopted is methodologically poorly justified, supported mostly by ‘tradition’ and ‘stability’, and therefore arbitrary, heterogeneous and unreliable.


  1. Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1999) International code of zoological nomenclature. ‘Fourth edition’. London (International Trust for zoological Nomenclature): i–xxix + 1–306.

  2. Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (2003) Declaration 44. Amendment of Article 74.7.3. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 60 (4): 263.

  3. Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (2012) Amendment of Articles 8, 9, 10, 21 and 78 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature to expand and refine methods of publication. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 69 (3): 161–169. <>.

  4. Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (2016) Declaration 45. Addition of Recommendations to Article 73 and of the term ‘specimen, preserved’ to the Glossary. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 73 (2–4): 96–97. <>.

  5. Anonymous [Global Biodiversity Information Facility] (2021) Free and open access to biodiversity data. <>. [Last accessed on 30 September 2021].

  6. Aescht, E. (2012) Catalogue of the generic names of Ciliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora). Denisia, 1: 1‒350.

  7. Anderson, J. (1871) Description of a new genus of newts from western Yunan. Proceeding of the zoological Society of London, 1871: 423–425.

  8. Anderson, J. (1879) Anatomical and zoological researches, comprising an account of the zoological results of the two expeditions to western Yunnan in 1868 and 1875 and monograph of the two cetacean genera Platanista and Orcella. London (Bernard Quaritch), ‘1878’, Volume 1: i–xxv + 1–985. <>.

  9. Angel, M. F. (1928) Sur une espèce nouvelle de grenouille du Tonkin, appartenant au genre Rana. Bulletin du Muséum national d’Histoire natuelle, 34: 319–320.

  10. Bauer, A. M., Parham, J. F., Brown, R. M., Stuart, B. L., Grismer, L., Papenfuss, T. J., Böhme, W., Savage, J. M., Carranza, S., Grismer, J. L., Wagner, P., Schmitz, A., Ananjeva, N. B. & Inger, R. F. (2010) Availability of new Bayesian-delimited gecko names and the importance of character-based species descriptions. Proceedings of the royal Society, (B), Biological Sciences, 278 (1705): 490–492. <>.

  11. Blainville, H. de (1816) Prodrome d’une nouvelle distribution systématique du règne animal. Bulletin des Sciences de la Société philomatique de Paris, Juillet 1816, ‘105–112’ [113–120] + 121–124.

  12. Blyth, E. (1856) Report for October Meeting, 1855. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, ‘1855’, 24: 711–723.

  13. Bolkay, S. (1911) On the systematic value of Rana chinensis Osbeck. Proceedings of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 13: 67–84, pl. 6. <>.

  14. Bonaparte, C. L. (1850) Conspectus systematum herpetologiae et amphibiologiae. Editio altera reformata. Lugduni Batavorum (E. J. Brill): 1 pl.

  15. Boulenger, G. A. (1882) Catalogue of the Batrachia Salientia s. Ecaudata in the collection of the British Museum. Second edition. London (Trustees of the British Museum, Natural History): i–xvi + 1–503, pl. 1–30.

  16. Boulenger, G. A. (1898) The tailless batrachians of Europe. Part 2. London (Ray Society): 211–376, 4 pl. + pl. 11–24.

  17. Boulenger, G. A. (1899) On a collection of Reptiles and Batrachians made by Mr. J. D. Latouche in N.W. Fokien, China. Proceedings of the zoological Society of London, 1899: 159–172, pl. 16‒19.

  18. Boulenger, G. A. (1908) A revision of the Oriental pelobatid Batrachians (genus Megalophrys). Proceedings of the zoological Society of London, 1908: 407–430. <>.

  19. Boulenger, G. A. (1918) On the races and variation of the edible frog, Rana esculenta, L. Annals and Magazine of natural History, (9), 2: 241–257. <>.

  20. Boulenger, G. A. (1920) A monograph of the South Asian, Papuan, Melanesian, and Australian frogs of the genus Rana. Records of the Indian Museum, 20: 1–226. <>.

  21. Bourret, R. (1942) Les Batraciens de l’Indochine. Hanoi (Institut océanographique de l’Indochine): i–x + 1–547, 4 pl.

  22. Dominguez, E. & Wheeler, Q. D. (1997) Taxonomic stability is ignorance. Cladistics, 13: 367–372. <>.

  23. Dubois, A. (1977) Les problèmes de l’espèce chez les Amphibiens Anoures. In: C. Bocquet, J. Génermont & M. Lamotte (ed.), Les problèmes de l’espèce dans le règne animal, 2, Mémoires de la Société zoologique de France, 39: 161–284.

  24. Dubois, A. (1984) La nomenclature supragénérique des Amphibiens Anoures. Mémoires du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, (A), Zoologie, 131: 1–64.

  25. Dubois, A. (1987) Miscellanea taxinomica batrachologica (I). Alytes, ‘1986’, 5 (1–2): 7–95.

  26. Dubois, A. (1992) Notes sur la classification des Ranidae (Amphibiens, Anoures). Bulletin mensuel de la Société linnéenne de Lyon, 61 (10): 305–352. <>.

  27. Dubois, A. (1998) List of European species of amphibians and reptiles: will we soon be reaching ‘stability’? Amphibia-Reptilia, 19 (1): 1–28. <>.

  28. Dubois, A. (1999) Miscellanea nomenclatorica batrachologica. 19. Notes on the nomenclature of Ranidae and related groups. Alytes, 17 (1–2): 81–100.

  29. Dubois, A. (2000) Synonymies and related lists in zoology: general proposals, with examples in herpetology. Dumerilia, 4 (2): 33–98.

  30. Dubois, A. (2005a) Proposed Rules for the incorporation of nomina of higher-ranked zoological taxa in the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 1. Some general questions, concepts and terms of biological nomenclature. Zoosystema, 27 (2): 365–426. <>.

  31. Dubois, A. (2005b) Amphibia Mundi. 1.1. An ergotaxonomy of recent amphibians. Alytes, 23 (1–2): 1–24.

  32. Dubois, A. (2007) Phylogeny, taxonomy and nomenclature: the problem of taxonomic categories and of nomenclatural ranks. Zootaxa, 1519: 27–68. <>.

  33. Dubois, A. (2010) Zoological nomenclature in the century of extinctions: priority vs. ‘usage’. Organisms, Diversity & Evolution, 10: 259–274. <>.

  34. Dubois, A. (2011) The International Code of Zoological Nomenclature must be drastically improved before it is too late. Bionomina, 2: 1–104. <>.

  35. Dubois, A. (2017) Diagnoses in zoological taxonomy and nomenclature. Bionomina, 12: 64–88. <>.

  36. Dubois, A. (2020) The status regarding publication date and availability of taxonomic works published online without proper Zoobank registration. Bionomina, 18: 44‒55. <>.

  37. Dubois, A. & Frétey, T. (2020a) Herpetological higher taxa nomina. 2. Anura Duméril, 1805. Bionomina, 20: 1‒16. <>.

  38. Dubois, A. & Frétey, T. (2020b) Herpetological higher taxa nomina. 3. Urodela Duméril, 1805. Bionomina, 20: 17‒35. <>.

  39. Dubois, A. & Frétey, T. (2021a) Herpetological higher taxa nomina. 6. Gymnophiona Rafinesque, 1814. Bionomina, 21: 39‒72. <>.

  40. Dubois, A. & Frétey, T. (2021b) Herpetological higher taxa nomina. 8. Amphibia Blainville, 1816. Bionomina, 21: 84‒110. <>.

  41. Dubois, A., Frétey, T., Lorvelec, O. & Ohler, A. (2021b) The nomenclatural status of the amphibian and reptile nomina introduced by La Cepède in his Histoire Naturelle des Quadrupèdes Ovipares et des Serpens, with comments on various questions of zoological nomenclature. Bionomina, 23: 1‒180. <>.

  42. Dubois, A., Frétey, T. & Ohler, A. (2018) The Relictus case: it is high time that taxonomists follow the Code’s requirements for nomenclatural availability and validity of new zoological nomina. Bionomina, 13: 51–64. <>.

  43. Dubois, A. & Ohler, A. (1995) Frogs of the subgenus Pelophylax (Amphibia, Anura, genus Rana): a catalogue of available and valid scientific names, with comments on name-bearing types, complete synonymies, proposed common names, and maps showing all type localities. Zoologica Poloniae, ‘1994’, 39 (3‒4): 139‒204.

  44. Dubois, A. & Ohler, A. (1999) Asian and Oriental toads of the Bufo melanostictus, Bufo scaber and Bufo stejnegeri groups (Amphibia, Anura): a list of available and valid names and redescription of some name-bearing types. Journal of South Asian natural History, 4 (2): 133‒180.

  45. Dubois, A. & Ohler, A. (2019) The nomina Anura, Urodela, Ecaudata and Caudata, credited to ‘Fischer von Waldheim, 1813’, do not exist, with comments on the nomenclature of higher zoological taxa and on the authorships and dates of other amphibian nomina. Bionomina, 14: 1‒68. <>.

  46. Dubois, A., Ohler, A. & Pyron, R. A. (2021a) [DOP] New concepts and methods for phylogenetic taxonomy and nomenclature in zoology, exemplified by a new ranked cladonomy of recent amphibians (Lissamphibia). Megataxa, 5 (1): 1‒738. <>.

  47. Dujardin, F. (1840) Mémoire sur une classification des infusoires en rapport avec leur organisation. Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des Séances de l’Académie des Sciences, 11 (7): 281‒286.

  48. Dujardin, F. (1841) Histoire naturelle des Zoophytes. Infusoires, comprenant la physiologie et la classification de ces animaux, et la manière de les étudier, à l’aide du microscope. Paris (Roret): i‒xii + 1‒684. <>.

  49. Duméril, A. M. C. (1805) Zoologie analytique, ou méthode naturelle de classification des animaux, rendue plus facile à l’aide de tableaux synoptiques. Paris (Allais), ‘1806’: i–xxxiii + 1‒544. <>.

  50. Ehrenberg, C. G. (1831) Über die Entwickelung und Lebensdauer der Infusionsthiere; nebst ferneren Beiträgen zu einer Vergleichung ihrer organischen Systeme. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1832: 1‒154, pl. 1‒4.

  51. Engel, M. S., Ceríaco, L.M.P., Daniel, G. M., Dellapé, P. M., Löbl, I., Marinov, M., Reis, R. E., Young, M. T. & Dubois, A. et al. [77 signatories] (2021) The taxonomic impediment: a shortage of taxonomists, not the lack of technical approaches. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 193: 381‒387.

  52. Fei, L. & Ye, C. (2016) Amphibians of China. Volume 1. Beijing (Science Press): i–xvi + 1‒1040.

  53. Fei, L., Hu S., Ye, C. & Huang, Y. (2009) Fauna sinica. Amphibia. Volume 3. Anura Ranidae. Beijing (Science Press): [i–iv] + i–xii + 959–1847, 16 pl. [In Chinese].

  54. Fei, L, Ye, C. & Huang, Y. (1990) Key to Chinese Amphibia. Chongqing (Editions of Sciences and Techniques): [i–iv] + 1–2 + 1–364. [In Chinese].

  55. Fischer, G. (1813) Zoognosia tabulis synopticis illustrata. Editio tertia, classium, ordinum, generum illustratione perpetua aucta. Volumen primum. Mosquae (Typis Nicolai Sergeidis Vsevolozsky): i–xiv + 1‒465.

  56. Fitzinger, L. J. F. J. (1843) Systema Reptilium. Fasciculus primus. Amblyglossae. Vindobonae (Braumüller & Seidel): 1–106 + i–ix.

  57. Fouquette, M. J., Jr. & Dubois, A. (2014) A checklist of North American Amphibians and Reptiles. Volume 1. Amphibians. Lexington, Kentucky (Xlibris): 1‒613.

  58. Frost, D. R. (ed.) (1985) Amphibian species of the world. Lawrence (Allen Press & Association of Systematics Collections): [i–iv] + i–v + 1–732.

  59. Frost, D. R. (2021) [ASW] Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. Version 6.1. American Museum of Natural History, New York (USA). <>. [Last accessed on: 30 January 2021 for ASW-1; 2 September 2021 for ASW-2].

  60. Frost D. R., Grant, T., Faivovich, J., Bazin, R. H., Haas, A., Haddad, C. F. B., de Sá, R. O., Channing, A., Wilkinson, M., Donnellan, S. C., Raxworthy, C. J., Campbell, J. A., Blotto, B. L., Moler, P., Drewes, R. C., Nussbaum, R. A., Lynch, J. D., Green, D. M., Wheeler, W. C. (2006) The amphibian tree of life. Bulletin of the American Museum of natural History, 297: 1–370. <[0001:TATOL]2.0.CO;2>.

  61. Gaffney, E. S. (1979) An introduction to the logic of phylogeny reconstruction. In: J. Cracraft & N. Eldredge (ed.), Phylogenetic analysis and paleontology, New York (Columbia University Press): 79–111. <>.

  62. Garnett, S. T, Christidis, L., Conix, S, Costello, M. J., Zachos, F. E, Bánki, O. S., Bao, Y., Barik, S. K., Buckeridge, J. S., Hobern, D., Lien, A., Montgomery, N., Nikolaeva, S., Pyle, R. L., Thomson, S. A., van Dijk, P. P., Whalen, A., Zhang, Z.-Q. & Thiele, K. R. (2020) Principles for creating a single authoritative list of the world’s species. PLoS Biology, 18 (7) [e3000736]: 1‒10. <https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pbio.300073>.

  63. Gray, J. E. (1825) A synopsis of the genera of Reptiles and Amphibia, with a description of some new species. Annals of Philosophy, (2), 10: 193–217.

  64. Guibé, J., (1950) Catalogue des types d’Amphibiens du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle. Paris (Imprimerie nationale): 1‒71.

  65. Günther, A. (1858) On the systematic arrangement of the Tailless Batrachians and the structure of Rhinophrynus dorsalis. Proceedings of the zoological Society of London, 1858: 339–352. <>.

  66. Günther, A. (1864) The Reptiles of British India. London (Ray Society): i–xxvii + 1–452, pl. 1–26.

  67. Günther, A. (1896) Report on the collections of Reptiles, Batrachians and Fishes made by Messrs Potanin and Berezowski in the Chinese provinces Kansu and Sze-chuen. Annales du Musée zoologique de l’Académie impériale des Sciences de Saint-Pétersbourg, 1: 199–219, pl. 1–2.

  68. Hallowell, E. (1861) Report upon the Reptilia of the North Pacific Exploring Expedition, under command of Capt. John Rogers, U. S. N. Proceedings of the Academy of natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1860: 480–510.

  69. Hoffman, A. C. (1932) Researches relating to the validity of the South African Polypedatidae (Rhacophoridae) as an autonomous family of the Anura. South African Journal of Science, 29: 562–583.

  70. Jerdon, T. C. (1870) Notes on Indian herpetology. Proceedings of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1870: 66–85.

  71. Kaiser, H., Crother, B. I., Kelly, C. M. R., Luiselli, L., O’Shea, M., Ota, H., Passos, P., Schleip, W. D. & Wüster, W. (2013) Best practices: in the 21st century, taxonomic decisions in herpetology are acceptable only when supported by a body of evidence and published via peer-review. Herpetological Review, 44 (1): 8–23.

  72. Kosuch, J., Vences, M., Dubois, A., Ohler, A. & Böhme, W. (2001) Out of Asia: mitochondrial DNA evidence for an Oriental origin of tiger frogs, genus Hoplobatrachus. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 21 (3): 398–407. <>.

  73. Krell, F.-T. (2015) A mixed bag: when are early online publications available for nomenclatural purposes? Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 72 (1): 19–32. <>.

  74. Krell, F.-T. (2021) Suppressing works of contemporary authors using the Code’s publication requirements is neither easy nor advisable. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 78: 61–67. <>.

  75. Li, J., Che, J., Bain, R. H., Zhao, E. & Zhang, Y. (2008) Molecular phylogeny of Rhacophoridae (Anura): a framework of taxonomic reassignment of species within the genera Aquixalus, Chiromantis, Rhacophorus, and Philautus. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 48 (1): 302–312. <>.

  76. Liu, C.-C. (1950) Amphibians of western China. Fieldiana: Zoology Memoirs, 2: 1‒400, pl. 1‒10. <>.

  77. Liu, C.-C. & Hu, S.-C. (1961) The tailless Amphibians of China. Beijing (Science Press): [i–ii] + i–xvi + 1–364, pl. 1–6 + 1–28. [In Chinese].

  78. Macleay W.S. (1821) Horae entomologicae: or Essays on the annulose animals. Volume 1. Part 2. London (Bagster): [i] + 161–524.

  79. Mahony, S., Kamei, R. G., Teeling, E. C. & Biju, S. D. (2018) Cryptic diversity within the Megophrys major species group (Amphibia: Megophryidae) of the Asian horned frogs: phylogenetic perspectives and a taxonomic revision of South Asian taxa, with descriptions of four new species. Zootaxa, 4523 (1): 1–96. <>.

  80. Müller, J. (1832) Beiträge zur Anatomie und Naturgeschichte der Amphibien. Zeitschrift für Physiologie, 4 (2): 190–275, pl. 18–22.

  81. Nieukerken, E. J. van, Karsholt, O., Hausmann, A., Holloway, J. D., Huemer, P., Kitching, I. J., Nuss, M., Pohl, G. R., Rajaei, H., Rennwald, E., Rodeland, J., Rougerie, R., Scoble, M. J., Sergey Yu. Sinev, S. Y. & Manfred Sommerer, M. (2019) Stability in Lepidoptera names is not served by reversal to gender agreement: a response to Wiemers et al. (2018). Nota lepidopterologica, 42 (1): 101–111. <>.

  82. Ohler, A. & Dubois, A. (2014) Is Dicroglossidae Anderson, 1871 (Amphibia, Anura) an available nomen? Zootaxa, 3838 (5): 590–594. <>.

  83. Ohler, A., Amarasinghe, A. A. T., Andreone, F., Bauer, A., Borkin, L., Channing, A., Chuaynkern, Y., Das, I., Deuti, K., Frétey, T., Matsui, M., Nguyen, T., Pyron, A., Rödel, M. O., Segniagbeto, G. H., Vasudevan, K. & Dubois, A. (2014) Case 3666. Dicroglossidae Dubois, 1987 (Amphibia, Anura): proposed conservation. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 71 (4): 244–249. <>.

  84. Osbeck, P. (1765) Reise nach Ostindien und China. Rostock (J. C. Koppe): [1‒6] + i‒xxiv + [1‒2] + 1‒552 + [1‒26], 13 pl.

  85. Padial, J. M., Miralles, A., De la Riva, I. & Vences, M. (2010) The integrative future of taxonomy. Frontiers in Zoology, 7 (16): 1–14. <>.

  86. Peters, W. C. H. (1863) Fernere Mittheilungen über neue Batrachier. Monatsberichte der königlichen Preussische Akademie des Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1863: 445–470.

  87. Poyarkov, N. A., Nguyen, T. V., Popov, E. S., Geissler, P., Pawangkhanant, P., Neang, T., Suwannapoom, C. & Orlov, N. L. (2021) [PEA] Recent progress in taxonomic studies, biogeographic analysis, and revised checklist of Amphibians in Indochina. Russian Journal of Herpetology, 28 (3A): 1‒110. <>.

  88. Rafinesque, C.S. (1814) Fine del prodromo d’erpetologia siciliana. Specchio delle Scienze o Giornale enciclopedico di Sicilia, 2 (10): 102–104.

  89. Rao, D.-Q. & Yang, D.-T. (1997) The karyotypes of Megophryinae (Pelobatidae) with a discussion on their classification and phylogenetic relationships. Asiatic herpetological Research, 7: 93–102. <>.

  90. Raposo, M. A., Kirwan, G. M., Calijorne Lourenço, A. C., Sobral, G., Bockmann, F. A. & Stopiglia, R. (2021) On the notions of taxonomic ‘impediment’, ‘gap’, ‘inflation’ and ‘anarchy’, and their effects on the field of conservation. Systematics and Biodiversity, 19 (3): 296–311. <>.

  91. Raposo, M. A., Stopiglia, R., Brito, G. R. R., Bockmann, F. A., Kirwan, G. M., Gayon, J. & Dubois, A. (2017) What really hampers taxonomy and conservation? A riposte to Garnett and Christidis (2017). Zootaxa, 4317 (1): 179–184. <>.

  92. Schneider, I. G. (1799) Historiae Amphibiorum naturalis et literariae. Fasciculus primus, continens Ranas, Calamitas, Bufones, Salamandras et Hydros, in genera et species descriptos notisque suis distinctos. Jena (Frommann): i–xv + 1–264, pl. 1–2. <>.

  93. Smith, M. A. (1953) Description of a new species of frog of the genus Philautus. Annals and Magazine of natural History, (12), 6: 477–478. <>.

  94. Tschudi, J. J. (1838) Classification der Batrachier, mit Berücksichtigung der fossilen Thiere dieser Abtheilung der Reptilien. Neuchâtel (Petitpierre): 1‒98, pl. 1–6 + [i–ii].

  95. Werner, F. (1903) Über Reptilien und Batrachier aus Guatemala und China in der zoologischen Staats-Sammlung in München nebst einem Abhang über seltene Formen aus anderer Gegenten. Abhandlungen der Mathematisch-Physikalischen Classe der königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 22: 342–384.

  96. Wiegmann, A. F. A. (1834) Amphibien. In: F. J. F. Meyen (ed.), Reise um die Erde ausfeführt auf dem königlich Preussischen Seehandlungs-Schiffe Prinzes Louise, comandiert von Captain W. Wendt, in den Jahren 1830, 1831 und 1832 von Dr. F. J. F. Meyen, Dritter Theil, Zoologisher Bericht, Berlin (Sander’schen Buchhandlung, C. W. Eichhoff): 433–522, pl. 52‒61.

  97. Zhao, E.-M. & Adler, K. (1993) Herpetology of China. Oxford, Ohio, USA (SSAR): 1–522 + [i–v], pl. 1–48 + 1.