Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Correspondence
Published: 2017-02-20
Page range: 593–596
Abstract views: 49
PDF downloaded: 1

Should we describe genera without molecular phylogenies?

Department of Biology, Shinshu University, Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan.
General molecular phylogenies

Abstract

For nearly a decade I have published species descriptions and revisions of land snails in peer- reviewed journals. As a systematist, it is often requisite to reclassify species into other, sometimes unnamed genera. Although in most cases editors and reviewers have not commented on the taxonomic changes I have made and the new taxa I described, I sometimes received negative critiques when I described new genera unaided by molecular phylogenetic support. I feel these critiques have become increasingly more frequent, and am convinced that many fellow taxonomists share this experience. Addressing this problem is particularly difficult due to three reasons. First, it is impossible to support these observations with statistical data (i.e. the frequency of similar reviews increasing or not); second, the increasing number of published phylogenetic works reveals more and more cases of polyphyletic genera, which might suggest that morphology-based generic grouping is unreliable, and thus, should be avoided; and third, no publications exist suggesting not to describe genera using (still) reliable morphological foundations. Subsequently, the unsatisfactory review process of taxonomic works is often exacerbated by the biases of reviewers and their inobservance of valuable historic convention in light of the current wave of molecular phylogenies. Moreover, the future value of morphological descriptions for biodiversity assessments (i.e. IUCN) is not even addressed.

 

References

  1. Bebber, D.P., Wood, J.R.I., Barker, C. & Scotland, R.W. (2014) Author inflation masks global capacity for species discovery in flowering plants. New Phytologist, 201, 700–706.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12522

    Ebach, M.C., Williams, D.M. & Morrone, J.J. (2006) Paraphyly is bad taxonomy. Taxon, 55 (4), 831–832.
    https://doi.org/10.2307/25065678

    Evenhuis, N.L. (2008) The “Mihi itch”—a brief history. Zootaxa, 1890, 59–68.

    Fontaine, B., van Achterberg, K., Alonso-Zarazaga, M.A., Araujo, R., Asche, M., Aspöck, H., Aspöck, U., Audisio, P., Aukema, B., Bailly, N., Balsamo, M., Bank, R.A., Belfiore, C., Bogdanowicz, W., Boxshall, G., Burckhardt, D., Chylarecki, P., Deharveng, L., Dubois, A., Enghoff, H., Fochetti, R., Fontaine, C., Gargominy, O., Gomez Lopez, M.S., Goujet, D., Harvey, M.S., Heller, K.G., van Helsdingen, P., Hoch, H., De Jong, Y., Karsholt, O., Los, W., Magowski, W., Massard, J.A., McInnes, S.J., Mendes, L.F., Mey, E., Michelsen, V., Minelli, A., Nieto Nafrıa, J.M., van Nieukerken, E.J., Pape, T., De Prins, W., Ramos, M., Ricci, C., Roselaar, C., Rota, E., Segers, H., Timm, T., van Tol, J. & Bouchet, P. (2012) New species in the Old World: Europe as a Frontier in Biodiversity Exploration, a Test Bed for 21st Century Taxonomy. PLoS ONE, 7 (5), e36881.
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036881

    Franz, N.M. (2005) On the lack of good scientific reasons for the growing phylogeny⁄classification gap. Cladistics, 21, 495–500.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00080.x

    Groenenberg, D.S.J., Neubert, E. & Gittenberger, E. (2011) Reappraisal of the ‘‘Molecular phylogeny of Western Palaearctic Helicidae s.l. (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora)’’: When poor science meets GenBank. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 61, 914–923.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2011.08.024

    Harris, D.J. & Froufe, E. (2005) Taxonomic inflation: species concept or historical geopolitical bias? TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 6–7.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.11.004

    Isaac, N.J.B., Mallet, J. & Mace, G.M. (2004) Taxonomic inflation: its influence on macroecology and conservation. TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 464–469.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.06.004

    Jaksch, K., Eschner, A., Rintelen, T.V. & Haring, E. (2016) DNA analysis of molluscs from a museum wet collection: a comparison of different extraction methods. BMC Research Notes, 9, 348.
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2147-7

    Kobelt, W. (1902) Das Tierreich. Eine Zusammenstellung und Kennzeichnung der rezenten Tierformen. In Verbindung mit der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft herausgegeben von der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin. Mollusca: Cyclophoridae. R. Friedländer und Sohn, Berlin, 662 pp.

    Mora, C., Tittensor, D.P., Adl, S., Simpson, A.G.B. & Worm, B. (2011) How Many Species Are There on Earth and in the Ocean? PLoS Biology, 9 (8), e1001127.
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127

    Nilsson, R.H., Ryberg, M., Kristiansson, E., Abarenkov, K., Larsson, K.-H. & Kõljalg, U. (2006) Taxonomic Reliability of DNA Sequences in Public Sequence Databases: A Fungal Perspective. PLoS ONE, 1 (1), e59.
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000059

    Nosil, P., Crespi, B.J. & Sandoval, C.P. (2002) Host-plant adaptation drives the parallel evolution of reproductive isolation. Nature, 417, 440–443.
    https://doi.org/10.1038/417440a

    Platnick, N.I. (1979) Philosophy and the transformation of cladistics. Systematic Zoology, 28, 537–546.
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2412566

    Schluter, D. & Nagel, L.M. (1995) Parallel speciation by natural selection. The American Naturalist, 146, 292–301.
    https://doi.org/10.1086/285799

    Wheeler, Q. (2004) Taxonomic triage and the poverty of phylogeny. Philosophical transactions of The Royal Society, London B, Biological Sciences, 359, 571–583.
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1452

    Wheeler, Q. (2014) Are reports of the death of taxonomy an exaggeration? New Phytologist, 201, 370–371.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12612

    Wood, B. & Collard, M. (1999) The changing face of genus Homo. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 8, 195–207.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1999)8:6%3C195::AID-EVAN1%3E3.0.CO;2-2