Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Articles
Published: 2012-02-06
Page range: 67–68
Abstract views: 39
PDF downloaded: 1

Description of the advertisement call of a species without vocal sac: Craugastor gollmeri (Amphibia: Craugastoridae)

Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apdo. 0843-03092, Balboa, Ancón, Panamá, Rep. de Panamá Círculo Herpetológico de Panamá, Apdo. 0824-00122, Panamá, Rep. de Panamá Departamento de Zoología, Universidad de Panamá, Panamá, Rep. de Panamá
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apdo. 0843-03092, Balboa, Ancón, Panamá, Rep. de Panamá Círculo Herpetológico de Panamá, Apdo. 0824-00122, Panamá, Rep. de Panamá Departamento de Histología y Neuroanatomía Humana, Universidad de Panamá, Panamá, Rep. de Panamá
Círculo Herpetológico de Panamá, Apdo. 0824-00122, Panamá, Rep. de Panamá Departamento de Zoología, Universidad de Panamá, Panamá, Rep. de Panamá
Amphibia Craugastoridae

Abstract

The Central American frogs of the genus Craugastor consist of 113 species (Hedges et al. 2008; Frost 2011). Craugastor gollmeri (Peters) occurs in lowland to highland forests of central Panama, the Caribbean versant of western Panama and eastern Costa Rica, even extending into the Pacific versant in northwestern Costa Rica, within an altitudinal distribution range of 10–1520 m (Savage 2002). At some localities, C. gollmeri has been found to be an usual to common forest species, being primarily a diurnal species that inhabits leaf-litter on the forest floor (Ibáñez et al. 1995; Savage 2002). The snout-vent length (SVL) of adult frogs is 30–36.5 mm in males and 45–54 mm in females (Savage 1987). The males of gollmeri species group lack vocal slits and vocal sac (Savage 1987), and seem incapable of producing vocalizations (Savage 2002). Nonetheless, here we describe the vocalizations given by a male of C. gollmeri in captivity, considered to be advertisement calls (sensu Wells 1977). The role of advertisement calls in species recognition and reproductive isolation has been well established (Wells 2007), hence, the relevance of call characters in anuran phylogenetic and systematic studies (e.g., Hoskin 2004).

References

  1. Frost, D.R. (2011) Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference, Version 5.5, American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. Available from: http://research.amnh.org/vz/herpetology/amphibia/ (December 7, 2011).

    Hedges, S.B., Duellman, W.E. & Heinicke, M.P. (2008) New World direct-developing frogs (Anura: Terrarana): Molecular phylogeny, classification, biogeography, and conservation. Zootaxa, 1737, 1–182.

    Hoskin, C.J. (2004) Australian microhylid frogs (Cophixalus and Austrochaperina): phylogeny, taxonomy, calls, distributions and breeding biology. Australian Journal of Zoology, 52, 237–269.

    Ibáñez D., R., Jaramillo, C.A., Arrunátegui, M., Fuenmayor, Q. & Solís, F.A. (1995) Inventario biológico del Canal de Panamá. Estudio herpetológico. Scientia (Panamá), Special Number 2, 111–159.

    Ibáñez D., R., Rand, A.S. & Jaramillo A., C.A. (1999) Los Anfibios del Monumento Natural Barro Colorado, Parque Nacional Soberanía y Areas Adyacentes. Editorial Mizrachi & Pujol, Panamá, 187 pp.

    Lynch, J.D. & Myers, C.W. (1983) Frogs of the fitzingeri group of Eleutherodactylus in eastern Panama and Chocoan South America (Leptodactylidae). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 175, 481–572.

    Savage, J.M. (1987) Systematics and distribution of the Mexican and Central American rainfrogs of the Eleutherodactylus gollmeri group (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae). Fieldiana Zoology, 33, 1–57.

    Savage, J.M. (2002) The Amphibians and Reptiles of Costa Rica. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 934 pp.

    Wells, K.D. (1977) The courtship of frogs. In: Taylor, D.H. & Guttman, S.I. (Eds), The Reproductive Biology of Amphibians. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 233–262.

    Wells, K.D. (2007) The Ecology and Behavior of Amphibians. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1148 pp.