Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 270 No. 3: 19 August 2016
Type: Correspondence
Published: 2016-08-19
DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.270.3.8
Page range: 227–230
Abstract views: 21
PDF downloaded: 1

Correcting the type designations of Caryodaphnopsis baviensis and C. laotica (Lauraceae)

State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Beijing, China. Email. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
United States Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service, National Germplasm Resources Laboratory, Bldg. 003, BARC-West, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-2350, U.S.A.
State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Beijing, China. Email.
Caryodaphnopsis Lauraceae typification Magnoliids

Abstract

There is confusion on the type collection of the name Nothaphoebe baviensis Lecomte, which had been cited either as Balansa 1445 or as Balansa 2445. We clarified this confusion by checking both collections. It turned out that the type is Balansa 2445, and Lecomte made an error in citation of the type in the protologue. Duplicates of the collection Balansa 1445 actually consist of a mixture including materials of Sapindaceae and Primulaceae. In addition, we found that the type collection of C. laotica Airy Shaw is Kerr 20893, not Kerr 20983, although the latter was cited in the protologue.